Advanced Search Results

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Ramesh D. Devnani

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 226 and 227; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 15, 126, 126(1), 126(2), 127, 135 to 139, 145, 153, 153(1), 154(5), 185(2), 185(3) and 185(5); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 21(2), 24, 37, 39, 39A, 40, 44, 53 and 67 to 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity Rules, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regularisation) Act, 2003 - Sections 21; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879

Reported in : AIR2005Guj66; (2005)2GLR1202

and it was found that there was a theft of electricity in DP box, lead seal simple plyet press and lighting meter terminal cover as well as PVC seal were found disturbed. The terminal was open and … of Gujarat vide notification no. GU-94-10-AEC-1691-4209-K dated 14th October, 1994 framed under section 21(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, City Civil Court at Ahmedabad has no jurisdiction to entertain this civil suit filed by the respondent. Section … xxx xxx4. xxx xxx5. xxx xxx 6. xxx xxx 7. xxx xxx 8. xxx xxx9. The Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regulation) Act, 2003.( Gujarat

Emperor Vs. Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Bom255; (1944)46BOMLR459

: 21 Bom. L.R. 867 Their Lordships observed that though the language of Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was not precisely the same as that of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, it was closely … appeal to the Privy Council (Besant v. Advocate-General of Madras I.L.R. (1919) Mad. 146 : 21 Bom. L.R. 867 Their Lordships observed that though the language of Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was not

Haji C.H. Mohammad Koya Vs. T.K.S.M.A. Muthukoya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationElection

Acts : Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 1 and 7; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(3), 123(3A) and 123(4)

Reported in : AIR1979SC154; (1979)2SCC8; [1979]1SCR664

reasons accompanying the Press Act which may be extracted thus :-Whereas it is expedient to repeal the Indian Press Act, 1910 and the newspapers (Incitements to Offences) Act, 1908, and to make further provision in the Press and Registration … mentioned in that section and make a declaration.14. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 8 of the Rules made under the Press Act runs thus :Every copy … in the High Court alleging that the appellant had committed various corrupt practices falling within the ambit of Sections 123(3), (3A) and (4) of the Act. It was mainly alleged that before the elections, the appellant was

Sagolsem Indramani Singh and ors. Vs. State of Manipur

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Advocate General of Madras' AIR 1918 PC 31 (L), it was held that Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was similar in language to Section 124A, IPC which had been subject to careful consideration in - 'Tilak's … be found in the Manipur State Courts, Act, 1947, cannot be accepted, as by not obtaining sanction under 8. 196, Criminal P. C, the appellants were seriously prejudiced, as their case was not examined by the appropriate

R.Santhana Raj Vs. the Chief Engineer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(2), 17; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 185, 67 (2)(a) to (d); Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 11; Works of Licensees Rules 2006 - Rule 3(1)(a); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21 Rule 97; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225, 188; Customs Act, 1962 - Section 133; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(1) to (3)

Act stands repealed with effect from 18.4.2006.29. The fact that Section 12(2) of the 1910 Act, cannot be pressed into service, can be seen from another perspective also. A comparison of Section 12(1) of the 1910 Act … find an answer to the above question, we may have to go back once again to the Electricity Act, 1910. Section 51 of the 1910 Act stipulated that notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 12 to 16 and 18 and … following decisions:-(i) R.Kannan vs. Power Grid Corporation (India) Ltd {2008 (4) MLJ 892}.(ii) T.Narayanan vs. District Executive Magistrate-cum-District Collector {2008 (4) MLJ 1024}.(iii) Daulat Singh

Macmillan and Company Ltd. Vs. K. and J. Cooper

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1924)26BOMLR292

the acquisition of copyright to which it is necessary to refer is the case of University of London Press, Limited v. University Tutorial Press, Limited [1910] 2 Ch 601 in which Mr. Justice Peterson, dealing with the … appellants obtain copyright in their book any reprint of North's translation would be an infringement of it under Section 8 of the Act of 1911.21. Mr. Upjohn also contended as their Lordships understood him that Sir Arthur Wilson

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must … Magistrate under Sub-section 1 of Section 3 is (like the action of the Magistrate under Sub-section 1 of Section 8) analogous to the action of the local Government under the second sub-section in the same clauses, and the

Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Vs. the Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 42 and 56; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 18 and 82

Reported in : AIR1972Raj40

and decree dated 10th February, 1968, of the Senior Civil Judge, Ganganagar.2. Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Sadulshahr whose supply of electricity for the purpose of running the factory remained disconnected from 28th March, … under Section 82 of the Electricity (Supply) Act of 1948 or under Section 56 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.6. In this Court it is conceded that the claim is not sustainable for breach of contractual obligation because … the Board, who wanted to disconnect the plaintiff's supply of energy on 8-2-1965 also but it could not be done then due to the intervention

Rosebud Sioux Tribe Vs. Kneip

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of intent through the 1907 and the 1910 Acts. [ Footnote 30 ] The "familiar forces" at work pressing for the opening of Indian lands did not cease with the cession of Gregory County. By late 1906, … THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Both the language and legislative history of the Acts of 1904, 1907, and 1910, whereby land in certain counties in South … domain outside of the geographic boundaries of any Indian reservation now existing. . . ." 48 Stat. 986. Section 8, relied heavily upon by the United States in its amicus brief, on its face refers to nothing more

Sagar Art Service, New Delhi Vs. Municipal Corporation, Gwalior and an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 5(56A), 8, 80(5), 82, 132(2)(1); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 3; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 91; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 6, 10, 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1988MP46; 1988MPLJ392

counsel Shri Khedkar joined hands with the appellant's counsel Shri Dubey to press for validity of the agreement being upheld, but he has, at the … of several enactments, such as the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, for short, 1956 Act, Indian Electricity Act, 1910, for short, the 1910 Act and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, for short, the 1948 Act.7. The plaintiff/appellant … under this Act'. Power of municipal corporation to acquire and bold movable and immovable property is contemplated under Section 8 which provides, inter alia, that Corporation shall have power subject to the provisions of this Act and the