Advanced Search Results

In Re: Abdul Kalam Azad

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : AIR1915Cal770,30Ind.Cas.746

petition is not in order on this point, that on Council in pursuance of Section 4(1) of the Press Act, 1910, declared the security of Rs. 2,000 deposited in respect of 'The Comrade and the Hamdard Press, Kucha-i-(sic) Delhi'

In Re: Abul Kalam Azad

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1915)ILR42Cal730

point, that on the 2nd November 1914 the Governor-General in Council in pursuance of Section 4(1) of the Press Act, 1910, declared the security of Rs. 2,000 deposited in respect of ' The Comrade and the Hamdard Press Kuchai-Chalan,

Emperor Vs. Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Bom255; (1944)46BOMLR459

: 21 Bom. L.R. 867 Their Lordships observed that though the language of Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was not precisely the same as that of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, it was closely

In Re: Mahomed Ali

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal466

that a pamphlet entitled 'Come over into Macedonia and help us' contains words of the nature described in Section 4, Sub-section (2) of the Indian Press Act, 1910 (I of 1910), inasmuch as they are likely to bring … Jenkins, C.J.1. This is an application to the High Court under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, to set aside what is described as an order of forfeiture under Section 12 of that Act.2. The

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.525

Abdur Rahim, Offg, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act of 1910 by Mrs. Annie Besant, the keeper and printer of the 'New India' Printing Works, and the … under Section 3 (1) of the Act an order of the Governor-in-Council, dated 25th August 1916, declaring under Section 4(1) the security so deposited and all copies of 'New India' wherever found to be forfeited to His Majesty.

In Re: Sundar Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1919All91; (1920)ILR42All233; 55Ind.Cas.110

the newspaper ' Bhavishya ' was printed. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Indian Press Act (I of 1910) he deposited on the 13th of February, 1919 the sum of Rs. 1,500, as security. … attracted the attention of the Local Government), and they, in exercise of the power conferred on them by Section 4, Clause (1), of the said Act, declared the security to be forfeited to His Majesty. Thereupon Mr. Sundar

Kedar Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Common Law; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1, Order 41; Defence of India Rules - Rules 11, 12 and 34(6); Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Constitution of Fire, 1937 - Article 40(6); Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898; Independence Act, 1947; Defence of India Act, 1939; Government of India Act, 1935; Indian Press Act, 1910 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9(1-A); East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 295A and 505; Prize Competitions Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC955; 1962(0)BLJR636; (1963)IMLJ40(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR769

Advocate General of Madras I.L.R. (1919) IndAp 176, which was a case under s. 4 of the Indian Press Act. (I of 1910), which was closely similar in language to s. 124A of the Penal Code. 27. The … Sinha, C.J.1. In these appeals the main question in controversy is whether Sections 124A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code have become void in view of the provisions of Article

Emperor Vs. Pandurang Balkrishna Pathak

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)16BOMLR87

the press for other work. He was, for such user convicted under Section 23, Clause 1 of the Press Act, 1910. The accused having applied in revision:-;That the conviction could not be upheld for Clause 1 of Section 23 … decide.2. The applicant had since the coming into force of Act I of 1910 made declarations under Sections 4 and 5 of Act XXV of 1867. The Magistrate had made an order under the proviso to Clause

In Re: Janasakti of Sylhet and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 138Ind.Cas.849

wounding two hundred, was not covered by the wider language of Section 4(1) of the now repealed Indian Press Act 1910 (Act I of 1910). It is not passible to lay down a precise test and we do not