Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: press act 1910 section 3 · Page 1 of about 1,121 results (0.076 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 03 1913

Emperor Vs. Fulchand Bapuji Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-1913

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1913)15BOMLR580; 20Ind.Cas.608

to the applicant a notice, Ext. 3, calling upon him under Section 1-3, sub-section 2, of the Indian Press Act 1910 to deposit with the District Magistrate security to the amount of Rs. 3,000 in money or an equivalent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1916

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-18-1916

Subject : Education

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.525

Abdur Rahim, Offg, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act of 1910 by Mrs. Annie Besant, the keeper and printer of the 'New India' Printing Works, and the … Chief Presidency Magistrate of Madras, dated 22nd May 1916, requiring her to deposit security of Rs. 2,000 under Section 3 (1) of the Act an order of the Governor-in-Council, dated 25th August 1916, declaring under Section 4(1) the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1919

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-13-1919

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

humbly recommend His Majesty that both these appeals should be dismissed with costs. Indian Press Act (1 of 1910), Section 3, Sub-section 1, Section 4, Sub-Section. 1, Sections 17, 22-Liberty of the Press-Control of printing presses-Declaration by possessor of … entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 1914

Emperor Vs. Pandurang Balkrishna Pathak

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1914

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)16BOMLR87

the press for other work. He was, for such user convicted under Section 23, Clause 1 of the Press Act, 1910. The accused having applied in revision:-;That the conviction could not be upheld for Clause 1 of Section 23 … of Act XXV of 1867. The Magistrate had made an order under the proviso to Clause 1 of Section 3 of Act I of 1910 dispensing with the deposit of any security. Subsequently the Magistrate, for reasons with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1962

Kedar Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-1962

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Common Law; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1, Order 41; Defence of India Rules - Rules 11, 12 and 34(6); Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Constitution of Fire, 1937 - Article 40(6); Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898; Independence Act, 1947; Defence of India Act, 1939; Government of India Act, 1935; Indian Press Act, 1910 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9(1-A); East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 295A and 505; Prize Competitions Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC955; 1962(0)BLJR636; (1963)IMLJ40(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR769

Advocate General of Madras I.L.R. (1919) IndAp 176, which was a case under s. 4 of the Indian Press Act. (I of 1910), which was closely similar in language to s. 124A of the Penal Code. 27. The … Congress men are assuming the attitude of Nawabs sitting on the chairs......' 3. Brought or attempted to bring into hatred or contempt or excited or … Sinha, C.J.1. In these appeals the main question in controversy is whether Sections 124A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code have become void in view of the provisions of Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2008

H.K. Dua Vs. Chander Mohan, Deputy Chief Minister of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-27-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2301

Reasons ac companying the Press Act may be extracted as under:Whereas it is expedient to repeal the Indian Press Act, 1910 and the Newspapers (Incitements of Offences) Act, 1908 and to make further provision in the Press and Registration … defines the 'Editor':Editor means the person who controls the selection of the matter that is published in the newspaper;Section 3 of the Press Act requires disclosure of the name of the printer and the place of printing, and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1978

Haji C.H. Mohammad Koya Vs. T.K.S.M.A. Muthukoya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1978

Subject : Media and CommunicationElection

Acts : Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 1 and 7; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(3), 123(3A) and 123(4)

Reported in : AIR1979SC154; (1979)2SCC8; [1979]1SCR664

reasons accompanying the Press Act which may be extracted thus :-Whereas it is expedient to repeal the Indian Press Act, 1910 and the newspapers (Incitements to Offences) Act, 1908, and to make further provision in the Press and Registration … in conformity with the rules hereinafter laid down. Section 5(1) runs thus :-Without prejudice to the provisions of Section 3, every copy of every such newspaper shall contain the names of the owner and editor thereof printed clearly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Ramesh D. Devnani

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 226 and 227; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 15, 126, 126(1), 126(2), 127, 135 to 139, 145, 153, 153(1), 154(5), 185(2), 185(3) and 185(5); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 21(2), 24, 37, 39, 39A, 40, 44, 53 and 67 to 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity Rules, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regularisation) Act, 2003 - Sections 21; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879

Reported in : AIR2005Guj66; (2005)2GLR1202

14 of the Constitution and principles of natural justice.'10. Looking to the provisions of section 185(2) read with section (3) of the Act of 1910, read with sub-section (5) with Schedule read with section 6 of the General … was a theft of electricity in DP box, lead seal simple plyet press and lighting meter terminal cover as well as PVC seal were found … of Gujarat vide notification no. GU-94-10-AEC-1691-4209-K dated 14th October, 1994 framed under section 21(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, City Civil Court at Ahmedabad has no jurisdiction to entertain this civil suit filed by the respondent. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1996

Pilibhit Electric Supply Co. (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Special Officer (El ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-1996

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6A, 7, 7A, 7A(2) and 7A(5); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1976; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 7A, 57 and 57A; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)773; JT1996(9)SC346; 1996(7)SCALE528; (1996)11SCC288; [1996]Supp7SCR324

provisions. The Indian Electricity Act, 1910 deals with supply of energy and licences in connection therewith. As per Section 3 of the said Act the State Government may on application made in the prescribed form and on payment … award dated 31st March 1980 rendered by Special Officer under Section 7-A as substituted in the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by U.P. Act 14 of 1976. The appellant, original licensee, under the … of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India was pressed at the time of final hearing by their learned senior counsel Shri

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1971

Amar Singh Modi Lal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-25-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; ;C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1972P& H356

this House in the Budhill and Carpalla cases (1910 AC 116 and 1910 AC 83) seems to me to have been this; the Court has … for the petitioners to constrict the meaning of the word 'mineral'.25. An argument which had also been faintly pressed before us was that in its ordinary popular meaning the word 'mineral' would not include brick-earth within its … by virtue of the General Government Notification No. G.S.R. 436, dated the 1st of June, 1958, issue under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957, is the important and slightly intricate question which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial