Advanced Search Results

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Ramesh D. Devnani

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 226 and 227; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 15, 126, 126(1), 126(2), 127, 135 to 139, 145, 153, 153(1), 154(5), 185(2), 185(3) and 185(5); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 21(2), 24, 37, 39, 39A, 40, 44, 53 and 67 to 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity Rules, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regularisation) Act, 2003 - Sections 21; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879

Reported in : AIR2005Guj66; (2005)2GLR1202

9 of the said judgment read as under:'8. The learned counsel for the respondent placed strong reliance on Section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 which contemplates seven days' notice before disconnection. Section 24 does not apply … was a theft of electricity in DP box, lead seal simple plyet press and lighting meter terminal cover as well as PVC seal were found … of Gujarat vide notification no. GU-94-10-AEC-1691-4209-K dated 14th October, 1994 framed under section 21(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, City Civil Court at Ahmedabad has no jurisdiction to entertain this civil suit filed by the respondent. Section

Sagolsem Indramani Singh and ors. Vs. State of Manipur

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Advocate General of Madras' AIR 1918 PC 31 (L), it was held that Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was similar in language to Section 124A, IPC which had been subject to careful consideration in - 'Tilak's … the meeting on 19-4-1953 at the Pologround, Imphal, and the latter searched the Churachand Printing Works premises on 24-4-1953 on the basis of a search warrant Ex. P/H and he recovered the speeches Exs. P/J, P/K and

Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Devidayal Metal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3(2), 21(2) and 37; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27 and 27(1); Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR540

bills. By the decree a permanent injunction was also granted restraining the appellants-defendants from taking any action under Section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act of 1910 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Since the power of the … requisition under this clause shall be in a form to be prescribed by rules under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910; and copies of the form shall be kept at the office of the licensee and supplied free of … the Constitution as well as Article 14 of the Constitution were not pressed at the hearing.11. Having regard to the findings referred to above, the

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Madhusudandass and Brothers

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 24, 26, 46 and 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1966Bom160; (1965)67BOMLR919; ILR1966Bom585

the bill did not justify the Board in disconnecting the supply under section 24(1) of the Indian Electricity Act 1910 and that the disconnection of supply being wrongful in could not claim the minimum charge of Mr. Phadke … able to show how that the revised tariffs were in contravention of the provisions of the act. When pressed to clarify his contention is said the tariff were not fixed in accordance with the regulations which is

Harsh Wood Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24 and 39; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21 and 226

Reported in : 1993(0)MPLJ901

their stand. His first contention is that nothing can override the provisions contemplated under Section 24(1), Indian Electricity Act, 1910, for short, the 1910 Act, contemplating 'not less than seven clear days' notice in writing' to be given … along, at all stages, the Board had been acting illegally and unconstitutionally and Clause 31 (e) cannot be pressed as the valid authority by the Board to support their stand. His first contention is that nothing can

A.P. Shah and ors. Vs. B.M. Institute of Mental Health, Ahmedabad Thro ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilLabour and Industrial

Reported in : (1986)2GLR910

the city of Nagpur on the ground that the notice for disconnection under Section 24(1) of the Electricity Act, 1910, was defective inasmuch as the amount claimed in the notice was not an accurate amount and in excess … the legality or validity of the inquiry was no more under challenge and the only contention which was pressed before him was that the findings of the Inquiry Officers were perverse and, in any case, the punishment

Aurangabad Industrial Associates Through Its Proprietor Vs. State of M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1885 - Sections 25; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR554

deposit or compensation and the supply of such consumer is disconnected under section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 or under Condition No. 31(e) of these conditions dies, or transfers, assigns or otherwise dispenses of the undertaking … Nos. 2 and 5 are concerned, their names are deleted because the relief claimed against them are not pressed by the petitioner, in this petition.3. Shri S.A. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has argued that there

Aditya Mills Ltd., Madanganj-kishengarh and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State E ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 59; Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 271; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Raj254; 1968()WLN181; 1968()WLN181

and, therefore, the Board could not press into service the provisions of Section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for purpose of disconnceting electricity at the premises of the petitioner. We shall deal with this argument of

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

all cases, a copy of the notice sent to the Government Printing Press for the purpose of being gazetted. However, due to long lapse of … Notifications issued and gazetted in 1918 by the Government of India in exercise of powers under the Cantonment Act, 1910. It was held that the 1918 Notifications had not been implemented, that in fact what had been done … which proceedings had not been completed on 30th August, 1975, the date, when Section 35 was repealed by Section 24 of the 1975 Act. It is in respect of such notices alone that the 1975 Act treated the

In Re: Janasakti of Sylhet and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 138Ind.Cas.849

wounding two hundred, was not covered by the wider language of Section 4(1) of the now repealed Indian Press Act 1910 (Act I of 1910). It is not passible to lay down a precise test and we do not … Pal v. The Crown 71 Ind. Cas. 519 : 3 Lah. 405 : A.I.R. 1923 Lah. 61 : 24 Cr.L.J. 167: 5 P.W.R. 1923 Cr. (S.B.), where a Special Bench of the Lahore High Court held that