Advanced Search Results

Emperor Vs. Fulchand Bapuji Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1913)15BOMLR580; 20Ind.Cas.608

press. On the 5th October, however, proceedings were taken against the applicant, and his prosecution was begun under Section 23 (1) of the Indian Press Act, 1910. That section provides for the punishment of any person who keeps … to the applicant a notice, Ext. 3, calling upon him under Section 1-3, sub-section 2, of the Indian Press Act 1910 to deposit with the District Magistrate security to the amount of Rs. 3,000 in money or an equivalent

Emperor Vs. Pandurang Balkrishna Pathak

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)16BOMLR87

the press for other work. He was, for such user convicted under Section 23, Clause 1 of the Press Act, 1910. The accused having applied in revision:-;That the conviction could not be upheld for Clause 1 of Section 23

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must … shall be heard and determined by a Special Bench of the High Court composed of throe Judges....8. By Section 23, anyone who keeps in his possession a press without making a deposit under Section 3 when required so

Urdu Daily Newspaper pratap Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1949CriLJ813

1918 Mad. 1210 : 18 Or. L. J. 167 (B. B.) which was a case under the Indian Press Act of 1910,8. 4 of which was couched in similar language as S. 124A, Penal Code. Section 4 (l) … of sub.S. (1) of S. 4 of the said Act. The present application is directed against this order.3. Section 23 of the Act, under which this application has ben made, confers on the High Court powers of a

Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Vs. the Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 42 and 56; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 18 and 82

Reported in : AIR1972Raj40

Section 21 and Section 22, Sub-section (2) of Section 22A and Sections 23 and 271 of that Act or in Clauses I to V, Clause … and decree dated 10th February, 1968, of the Senior Civil Judge, Ganganagar.2. Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Sadulshahr whose supply of electricity for the purpose of running the factory remained disconnected from 28th March, … under Section 82 of the Electricity (Supply) Act of 1948 or under Section 56 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.6. In this Court it is conceded that the claim is not sustainable for breach of contractual obligation because

Rajeev Kumar Jauhari Son of Surendra Kumar Jauhari, Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR544(All); 2007(2)AWC1726

it would be prudent to consider the effect of Reforms Act, 1999 on the provisions of the Electricity Act, 1910 (in short '1910 Act') and 1948 Act. Section 54 of the Reforms Act provides the effect of enactment … with UPRVUNL and are required to be repatriated for which they are pressing hard but due to non availability of sufficient number of working hands … companies etc. and be a legal successor of UPSEB in relation to all power purchase and transmission agreements. Section 23(1) of Reforms Act, 1999 provides that on and from the date specified in the Transfer Scheme prepared by

Sri Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju Bahadur Garu Vs. the Revenue ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1939)41BOMLR725

and the mere possibility, which had already been suggested in the Indian Press, was detrimental to the interest of the port. It appears from a … Commissioners v. Clay [1914] 3 K.B. 466. That was a case under Section 25(1) of the Finance (1909-1910) Act, 1910, and is not perhaps strictly relevant to the present case. The facts of it, however, are worth recalling. … to be treated as a vendor willing to sell at 'the market price,' to use the words of Section 23 of the Indian Act. It is perhaps desirable in this connection to say something about this expression 'the

Rosebud Sioux Tribe Vs. Kneip

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of intent through the 1907 and the 1910 Acts. [ Footnote 30 ] The "familiar forces" at work pressing for the opening of Indian lands did not cease with the cession of Gregory County. By late 1906, … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Both the language and legislative history of the Acts of 1904, 1907, and 1910, whereby land in certain counties in South Dakota located within the boundaries of … U. S. 601 school lands located within a continuing reservation. [ Footnote 23 ] The far more natural construction, then, is to read a congressional … while six separate Reservations were carved out of the remainder, §§ 1-6. Section 2 set apart the Rosebud Reservation, encompassing what were later organized as

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 28; Indian Telegraphy Act, 1985 - Sections 51; Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 2C(1) and 14(2)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

the writ petitioners on the grounds that the same was contrary to the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 (for short, 'the Supply Act') and the Rules framed thereunder, Section 76M of … the Court to take into account subsequent events in moulding the relief or refusing the relief cannot be pressed into service by the Courts to divest the rights already vested by a statute. Such a situation does … to file their pleadings/objections and after hearing them, passed an order dated 23.04.1997 directing removal of the obstructions.9. Being aggrieved by the above order of

Bihar State Electricity Board and Others Vs. Parmeshwar Kumar Agarwala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22-B and 37; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 26, 46, 49 and 70

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)221; AIR1996SC2214; JT1996(5)SC555; 1996(5)SCALE1; (1996)4SCC686; [1996]Supp3SCR29

months, in which the meter ran correctly and reading was duly recorded. Section 26 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, hereinafter the 1910 Act, is on the subject of 'Meters' and Sub-section (1) of this section requires that … similar to the one as was in the aforementioned case, we don't think if Clause 14 can be pressed into service to sustain the notification, as present not a case of alteration of charges mentioned in the … No. 5873 taken in the 388th meeting of the Board held on 23.1.1987, after taking into consideration all the aspects of the matter, has decided