Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.525

Abdur Rahim, Offg, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act of 1910 by Mrs. Annie Besant, the keeper and printer of the 'New India' Printing Works, and the … however, it is not open to us to set aside the order of the Chief Presidency Magistrate. Whether Section 22 of this Act bars all interference on our part or not, is a question which will have to

In Re: Mahomed Ali

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal466

Jenkins, C.J.1. This is an application to the High Court under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, to set aside what is described as an order of forfeiture under Section 12 of that Act.2. The … visible representations of the nature described in Section 4, Sub-section (1). Together with this section must be read Section 22 by which, with a qualified exception in favour of the High Court, all jurisdiction of the Courts is

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must … rightly said, for the information of his superiors in the Government.29. Further, in this connection the provisions of Section 22, upon which comment will shortly be made, must not be left out of sight. If a declaration of

Assistant Collector of Customs for Appraisement and anr. Vs. Soorajmul ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167, 183, 188 and 198; ; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1952Cal656,56CWN453

words 'criminal proceeding' excluded high prerogative writs. Their Lordships had to consider whether Section 22 of the Indian Press Act, 1910 excluded an application for a high prerogative writ to the High Court of Madras. The section was in

israil Khan Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

have been removed from the revisional jurisdiction of the H C. are found in Section 22 of the Press Act, 1910, Section 15, Extradition Act, 1903, Section 16, Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 & Section 51, Emergency Powers Ordinance, 1932.12.In 'Hiralal

Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Vs. the Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 42 and 56; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 18 and 82

Reported in : AIR1972Raj40

obligation exists, no question of its breach can arise. It is admitted on behalf of the appellant that Section 22 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 relating to the obligation of the licensee to supply energy is not … of the Senior Civil Judge, Ganganagar.2. Firm Sadul Shahr Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory Sadulshahr whose supply of electricity for the purpose of running the … under Section 82 of the Electricity (Supply) Act of 1948 or under Section 56 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.6. In this Court it is conceded that the claim is not sustainable for breach of contractual obligation because

Manilal Gangaram Sindore Vs. Nasik-deolali Electric Supply Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22; Bombay Electricity (Emergency Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 5(1); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 55; Defence of India Rules - Rule 81(2)

Reported in : AIR1952Bom33; (1951)53BOMLR706; ILR1951Bom756

is that both the appeals fail and are dismissed with costs.(18) Appeals dismissed. Indian Electricity Act (IX of 1910), Section 22 - Bombay Electricity (Emergency Powers) Act (Bom. XX of 1946), Section 5(1)--Application by consumer for transfer of electrical … those appellate decisions the original plaintiffs have come in appeal.(5) Before dealing with the specific points which were pressed before us by Mr. Desai for the appellants in both the appeals, it appears necessary to refer to

The Amalgamated Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. N.S. Bathena

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 16, 21, 22, 24, 76, 76(1), 76(2) and 115; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Arbitration Act - Sections 20 and 34; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 16(3), 21, 21(2), 21(4), 22, 24(2), 28 and 70

Reported in : AIR1958Kant148; AIR1958Mys148; ILR1958KAR62; (1958)36MysLJ131

invited my attention to Sections 16(3), 21, 21(2), 21(4), proviso to Sections 22, 24(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Clauses 5(2), 6(3) and 12 … The arbitration agreement pleaded is one based on the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and the Act. It was contended before the trial Court that in view of Section 76(1) of the … The trial Court in an exceedingly well written order rejected all these contentions. The first contention was not pressed before the appellate Court. The other two were pressed but rejected. 3. In this Court the petitioner takes

In Re: Mr. Annie Besant

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1917)32MLJ151

the contention of the Advocate General that the Indian Press Act of 1910 is a self-contained enactment. He points out that it provides for its … the legislature which could only be done by express words or by necessary implication.3. I find nothing in Section 22 of the Press Act which can be said o have deprived the High Court of this power. Section … have already dealt with the contention of Mrs. Annie Besant in the petition under Section 17 of the Press Act and held that the order was made in excess of the power conferred on the Magistrate but that

The Amalgamated Electricity Company Ltd. Vs. the Jalgaon Borough Munic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22 and 23

Reported in : AIR1975SC2235; (1975)2SCC508; [1976]1SCR636; 1975(7)LC794(SC)

appellant, fairly conceded that he would not be in a position to press his claim for interest prior to the date of the suit and … there was any such clause in the agreement it was void under Section 23 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. A number of other defence were also taken with which we are not concerned.5. The trial Court of … the agreement seem to us to be in consonance with the spirit and letter of the proviso to Section 22 of the Indian Electricity Act which runs thus:Provided that no person shall be entitled to demand, or to