Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.525

Abdur Rahim, Offg, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act of 1910 by Mrs. Annie Besant, the keeper and printer of the 'New India' Printing Works, and the … of a Special Bench of the High Court composed of three Judges to hear and determine such application.58. Section 19 empowers the Special Bench so constituted to set aside the order of forfeiture, if it appears that the

Kedar Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Common Law; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1, Order 41; Defence of India Rules - Rules 11, 12 and 34(6); Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Constitution of Fire, 1937 - Article 40(6); Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898; Independence Act, 1947; Defence of India Act, 1939; Government of India Act, 1935; Indian Press Act, 1910 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9(1-A); East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 295A and 505; Prize Competitions Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC955; 1962(0)BLJR636; (1963)IMLJ40(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR769

Advocate General of Madras I.L.R. (1919) IndAp 176, which was a case under s. 4 of the Indian Press Act. (I of 1910), which was closely similar in language to s. 124A of the Penal Code. 27. The … of measures of Government or acts of public officials, might also come within the ambit of the penal section. 19, Sections 124A and 505 are clearly violative of Art. 19(1)(a) read with clause (2). It is well settled

In Re: Mahomed Ali

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal466

Jenkins, C.J.1. This is an application to the High Court under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, to set aside what is described as an order of forfeiture under Section 12 of that Act.2. The … to satisfy the requirements of Section 12. Further, our jurisdiction is very closely confined by the terms of Section 19, with which Sections 17 and 22 must be read; and I have doubts whether it may not be

Urdu Daily Newspaper pratap Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1949CriLJ813

1918 Mad. 1210 : 18 Or. L. J. 167 (B. B.) which was a case under the Indian Press Act of 1910,8. 4 of which was couched in similar language as S. 124A, Penal Code. Section 4 (l) … 1. This is an application under S. 23, Press (Emergency Powers) Act 1931 (Act XXIII [28] of 1981) for setting aside an order of forfeiture of security made on 16th May

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Jsw Energy Limite ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

vary between Rs.2.75 to Rs.2.80. It has also been reported in the press that for the power proposed to be generated from the Kayamkulam Thermal … the KPTC shall discharge such powers, duties and functions of the Board including those under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 or the rules framed thereunder, as may be specified in the license … prior to commencement of Karnataka Electricity Reform Act, 1999 with effect from 01.06.1999, in terms of Explanation to Section 19 and proviso to Section 27(2) of the Act?. if the answer is in the positive, whether the Commission

Emperor Vs. Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Bom255; (1944)46BOMLR459

: 21 Bom. L.R. 867 Their Lordships observed that though the language of Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was not precisely the same as that of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, it was closely … accused Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao. The accused had been charged under Rule 38(5) of the Defence of India Rules, 1939, for having on January 26, 1943, made, published and distributed copies of a leaflet which contained prejudicial reports

Rameshchandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311

Reported in : AIR1967MP81; (1967)IILLJ658MP

justices referred the matter to the compensation authority of the borough under Section 19 of the Licensing (Consolidation) Act, 1910. At a further meeting the licensing justices had resolved that a solicitor should be instructed to appear before … 7th August 1965.4. A number of grounds have been raised in the petition, but only two grounds were pressed before us. The two grounds relate to:--(1) bias of Shri Patankar, the Chairman of the Board of Enquiry;

R.Santhana Raj Vs. the Chief Engineer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(2), 17; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 185, 67 (2)(a) to (d); Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 11; Works of Licensees Rules 2006 - Rule 3(1)(a); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21 Rule 97; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225, 188; Customs Act, 1962 - Section 133; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(1) to (3)

Act stands repealed with effect from 18.4.2006.29. The fact that Section 12(2) of the 1910 Act, cannot be pressed into service, can be seen from another perspective also. A comparison of Section 12(1) of the 1910 Act … find an answer to the above question, we may have to go back once again to the Electricity Act, 1910. Section 51 of the 1910 Act stipulated that notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 12 to 16 and 18 and … any high tension electric towers in their property in Survey No.195/1D and 195.14, Veerasigamani Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District, in violation of the provisions of

The Tata Hydro-electric Power Supply Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of In ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; Indian Electricity Act, 1960; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16(1) and 20; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26

Reported in : 2001(2)ALLMR30; 2001(2)BomCR20; (2001)1BOMLR526; 2001(1)MhLj755

the subject matter of dispute was fully covered by the provisions of Section 26 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 which precluded arbitration by a private person. Being aggrieved by the said judgment of the learned Single Judge, … of the law.15. M/s. Kapoor Nilokheri Co-op. Dairy Farm Society Ltd. v. Union of India and others; was pressed into service in support of the proposition that where the party had specifically stated before the Arbitrator that … of the learned Single Judge (D. K. Deshmukh, J.) dated 17th December 1999 allowing the Petition and setting aside the Arbitration Award No. 18 of

Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Devidayal Metal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3(2), 21(2) and 37; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27 and 27(1); Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR540

requisition under this clause shall be in a form to be prescribed by rules under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910; and copies of the form shall be kept at the office of the licensee and supplied free of … injunction was also granted restraining the appellants-defendants from taking any action under Section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act of 1910 (hereinafter referred to as … under Articles 301 to 305 of the Constitution as well as Article 14 of the Constitution were not pressed at the hearing.11. Having regard to the findings referred to above, the learned Judge decreed the plaintiffs' suit. … decree passed by the learned single Judge in suit No. 630 of 1967 : AIR1980Bom154 by which the learned single Judge held that the Municipal