Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: press act 1910 section 1 · Page 1 of about 1,163 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1915

In Re: Abul Kalam Azad

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-11-1915

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1915)ILR42Cal730

point, that on the 2nd November 1914 the Governor-General in Council in pursuance of Section 4(1) of the Press Act, 1910, declared the security of Rs. 2,000 deposited in respect of ' The Comrade and the Hamdard Press Kuchai-Chalan,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 1915

In Re: Abdul Kalam Azad

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-11-1915

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : AIR1915Cal770,30Ind.Cas.746

petition is not in order on this point, that on Council in pursuance of Section 4(1) of the Press Act, 1910, declared the security of Rs. 2,000 deposited in respect of 'The Comrade and the Hamdard Press, Kucha-i-(sic) Delhi'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1913

In Re: Mahomed Ali

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-01-1913

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal466

Jenkins, C.J.1. This is an application to the High Court under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, to set aside what is described as an order of forfeiture under Section 12 of that Act.2. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 1962

Kedar Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-1962

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Common Law; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1, Order 41; Defence of India Rules - Rules 11, 12 and 34(6); Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Constitution of Fire, 1937 - Article 40(6); Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898; Independence Act, 1947; Defence of India Act, 1939; Government of India Act, 1935; Indian Press Act, 1910 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9(1-A); East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 295A and 505; Prize Competitions Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC955; 1962(0)BLJR636; (1963)IMLJ40(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR769

Advocate General of Madras I.L.R. (1919) IndAp 176, which was a case under s. 4 of the Indian Press Act. (I of 1910), which was closely similar in language to s. 124A of the Penal Code. 27. The … Sinha, C.J.1. In these appeals the main question in controversy is whether Sections 124A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code have become void in view of the provisions of Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1919

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Advocate General of Madras

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-13-1919

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR867

entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control of the Press, ' and shortly ' The Indian Press Act, 1910. ' Under the first Act, Section 4, the person who keeps in his possession a printing press must … of India in Council relating to printing, one being The Printing Presses and Newspapers Act No. XXV of 1S67. and the other being Act No. I of 1910 entitled 'An Act to provide for the better control

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1916

Mrs. Annie Besant Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-18-1916

Subject : Education

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.525

Abdur Rahim, Offg, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 17 of the Indian Press Act of 1910 by Mrs. Annie Besant, the keeper and printer of the 'New India' Printing Works, and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1944

Emperor Vs. Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-1944

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Bom255; (1944)46BOMLR459

: 21 Bom. L.R. 867 Their Lordships observed that though the language of Section 4 of the Indian Press Act, 1910, was not precisely the same as that of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, it was closely … accused Sadashiv Narayan Bhalerao. The accused had been charged under Rule 38(5) of the Defence of India Rules, 1939, for having on January 26, 1943, made, published and distributed copies of a leaflet which contained prejudicial reports

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1914

Emperor Vs. Pandurang Balkrishna Pathak

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1914

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)16BOMLR87

the press for other work. He was, for such user convicted under Section 23, Clause 1 of the Press Act, 1910. The accused having applied in revision:-;That the conviction could not be upheld for Clause 1 of Section 23

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1913

Emperor Vs. Fulchand Bapuji Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-1913

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1913)15BOMLR580; 20Ind.Cas.608

to the applicant a notice, Ext. 3, calling upon him under Section 1-3, sub-section 2, of the Indian Press Act 1910 to deposit with the District Magistrate security to the amount of Rs. 3,000 in money or an equivalent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1996

Pilibhit Electric Supply Co. (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Special Officer (El ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-1996

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6A, 7, 7A, 7A(2) and 7A(5); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1976; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 7A, 57 and 57A; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)773; JT1996(9)SC346; 1996(7)SCALE528; (1996)11SCC288; [1996]Supp7SCR324

award dated 31st March 1980 rendered by Special Officer under Section 7-A as substituted in the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by U.P. Act 14 of 1976. The appellant, original licensee, under the … S.B. Majmudar, J. 1. The appellant Electric Supply Co. has brought in challenge the judgment and … U.P. Legislature. This appeal by grant of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India was pressed at the time of final hearing by their learned senior counsel Shri Salve and learned Counsel Shri Gupta

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial