Advanced Search Results
Radhakishan Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-27-1962
Criminal
Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 52; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 467 and 471; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103 and 165
AIR1963SC822; (1963)IILLJ667SC; [1963]Supp(1)SCR408
a postman attached to the Bulandshahr post office was tried for offences under s. 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (VI of 1898), and in two of them, also for offences under Sections 467 and 471 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore
Supreme Court of India
Apr-01-1964
Criminal
Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55
AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606
determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … of any mail bag or postal article, and thus emphasizes the necessity of prompt transport of postal articles. Sections 52 to 66 provide for offences by officers of a post office. Section 52 provides punishment for committing theft
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Govindan Nair
Chennai
Nov-18-1958
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103, 165 and 165(5); Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 52
AIR1959Mad544; 1958CriLJ777
- conviction - Sections 103, 165 and 165 (5) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 52 of Post Office Act, 1898 - Session Judge convicted accused under Section 52 - appeal - conviction of accused under Section 52 irreproachable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Queen-empbess Vs. Dolegobind Dass
Kolkata
Dec-18-1900
Criminal
(1901)ILR28Cal211
Magitrates, charged with offences under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. He was discharged on the same day, the Bench considering that the evidence was insufficient to warrant 'a … of accused--Re-arrest of accused without previous order of discharge being set aside--Code of Criminal Procedure (Act V. of 1898), Sections 252, 258, 403, 436, and 437--Indian Post Office Act (VI of 1898), Section 52--Power of Judge of High
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Jul-07-1980
Excise
Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic
1981(8)ELT772(Raj)
date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … is submitted by the learned counsel, is prescribed by Rules 9 and 52 but since the procedure prescribed under Rule 9 and/or 52 was not … 1949. It came into force at once. We may, therefore, for the sake of convenience, reproduce the relevant sections of the Ordinance, which have been referred to by the learned counsel in the course of their arguments
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.L. Angshung Anal Vs. State of Manipur
Guwahati
Mar-24-1994
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 37, 42 and 50; Post Offices Act - Sections 52; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 43, 103, 165 and 439; Criminal Law
tried and convicted of an offence under Section 52 of the Post Offices Act, for secreting Postal … being in contravention with the requirements of Section 165, Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, that provision cease to have any application to the subsequent steps in … Assistant Collector of Customs.10. In Radhakishan v. State of U. P., : (1963)IILLJ667SC , the appellant was a postman. He and his father were living in the same house. Certain undelivered postal articles were recovered from an … the petitioner first drew my attention to Section 42 of the N.D.P.S. Act and submitted that except the officers mentioned therein, none has any authority whatsoever under the law to arrest the petitioner or make any search … articles is not vitiated. It may be that where the provisions of Sections 103 and 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are contravened the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahabirprasad S. Deora and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Sep-16-1994
Civil
Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3, 21, 52 and 55; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1995Bom142; 1995(3)BomCR640; 1996(1)MhLj1013
by the Director General in exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (3) of Section 21 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.By Notification, the Director General made the order to be called as 'Delivery of Mail Order 1991' and the … be delivered in the mail box situated at the entrance of the building would make the provisions of sections 52 and 55 unworkable. We are unable to find any merit in the contention. Section 52 provides for penalty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. Union of India Rep by the Director of Postal S ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
May-04-2012
Education
the offence committed under section 409, 467 and 471 of IPC read with section 52 of (The Indian) Post Office Act, 1898. The said criminal case is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1 in Crime No. 4and5/2010. The … Honourable Shri. G. Shanthappa, Member (J) The above OA is filed under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal's Act, 1985, challenging the legality and propriety of the charge memo No.F1/IV-2/06-07/MT dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South, Bombay Vs. Ogale Glass W ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-1954
Direct Taxation
Indian Contract Act - Sections 50
AIR1954SC429; (1954)56BOMLR1196; [1954]24CompCas520(SC); [1954]25ITR259(SC); [1955]1SCR185
English law, delivery to the addressee. But that, Sri Kolah maintains, is not the position under the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. We have been taken through the different sections of that Act and the rules made thereunder and Sri … moment the goods vest in the buyer ?' 28. The decision in Comber v. Leyland L.R. [1898] A.C. 524, is very important for our purpose in that it explains the meaning and implication of the word 'remit'
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Bichitrananda Mohanty
Orissa
Mar-20-1958
Criminal
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 6 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 165A, 465 and 471; Post Offices Act - Sections 52; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 193(2)
AIR1958Ori150; 1958CriLJ916
India, submitted charge-sheet for offence under Sections 409/467, I. P. C. and Section 52 of the Indian Post Offices Act 1898 (Act VI of 1898), against a Postman named Bichitrananda Mohanty, on 31-3-1955, before the Additional District … submitted charge-sheet for offence under Sections 409/467, I. P. C. and Section 52 of the Indian Post Offices Act 1898 (Act VI of 1898), against a Postman named Bichitrananda Mohanty, on 31-3-1955, before the Additional District Magistrate of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »