Advanced Search Results

ismail Khan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1915All273; 28Ind.Cas.655

he was rightly convicted. So far as the conviction under Section 61 read with Section 70 of the Post Office Act is concerned, we think that the conviction was not justified by law. Section 70 of the Post Office … think that the conviction was not justified by law. Section 70 of the Post Office Act, VI of 1898, provides that any person, 'who abets the commision of any offence punishable under the Act or attempts to

Emperor Vs. Ismail Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1915)ILR37All289

convicted under Section 60A of the Excise Act and under Section 61 read with Section 70 of the Post Office Act. On conviction on the first charge he was fined Rs. 200 and on the second one Rs. 100, … think that the conviction was not justified by law. Section 70 of the Post Office, Act VI of 1898, provides that any person 'who abets the commission of any offence punishable under the Act or attempts to

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 4(10), 25, 39, 39(S), 40, 40(2) and 42(2); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 34, 55(1), 61, 61(1) and 62; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 3(1), 4, 6 and 297(2); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 57(2); Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 35 and 35(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96, 100 and 115; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 25 and 125; Motor Vehicles Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Haryana General Sales Tax Rules - Rules 24 and 60

Reported in : (2005)140PLR313; [2005]141STC119(P& H)

of Haryana and Anr., (2004)136 S.T.C. 261 and the provisions of Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 (for short, the General Clauses Act'). On the basis of the aforesaid pronouncement in Khazan Chand Nathi Ram's … to an officer, authority or Tribunal, shall for the purpose of carrying into effect the provision contained in Section 61, be construed as a reference to the corresponding officer, authority or Tribunal and if any question arises as … revisional authority has not been conferred under the VAT Act on any officer and, therefore, respondent No. 2 could not have issued notice under Section

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … or delay of a postal article by an officer of the post office in one of the several sections which create offences under this Act. There are 21 such sections, being sections 49 (1)31 Ch. D. 174. … The offences under Ss. 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 68 and 69 are made punishable also with imprisonment. Of these

M. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. Union of India Rep by the Director of Postal S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Education

the offence committed under section 409, 467 and 471 of IPC read with section 52 of (The Indian) Post Office Act, 1898. The said criminal case is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1 in Crime No. 4and5/2010. The

Post Master, Nagakudaiyan Branch, Vedaranniyam Division and Another Vs ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

District Forum erroneously allowed the complaint without taking in to the provisions under Section 48-C of the Indian Post Office Act 1898 and non joinder of parties. Hence complaint to be dismissed.7. While considering both sides arguments, averments and contentions … for his friend Parthasarathy in all Rs.220/- through money order on 4.7.2007 to the Junior Engineer, TNEB, Kariyapattinam 614 806 by paying money order charges Rs.11/- and obtained receipt for the same. The electricity charges are to

Alubhai Mujatbhai Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1966)7GLR698

50/-, or, in default, rigorous imprisonment for 15 days for an offence under Section 53 of the Indian Post Office Act.2. The charge against the appellant-accused was that on or about 3rd of October 1963, while 'he was in … Office Act read with the definition of the term 'complaint' Under Section 4(1)(h) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, the Court of the learned Magistrate was not justified in law to take cognizance of an offence punishable … sections 51, 53, 54 Clauses (a) and (b), 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 64, 65, 66 and 67 of this Act, unless upon complaint made

Gnanaprakasam Barnabas Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ1777

the said sections.4. Section 72 of the Post Office Act 6 of 1898 provides:No Court shall take cognisance of an offence-punishable under any of the … In - Emperor v. Rohini Kumar 10 Cal WN 1029 (A) it was held that a prosecution under Section 61, Post Office Act although authorised by the Post Master General is illegal unless such prosecution takes place on … the appellant in this case under Sections 409 and 477A, Penal Code and Sections 53 and 55, Indian Post Office Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 409, Penal Code, six months under

Thakore Fatesingji Dipsangji Vs. Bamanji Ardeshir Dalal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyProperty

Reported in : (1904)ILR27Bom335

worthless jungle into an apparently thriving colony, supplied with houses, shops, fire-engine and water-cisterns, dispensary, hospital, school and post office. There could have been no reasonable ground at any time for supposing that the defendant had done all … under the Waste Land Rules. On a further application, dated 17th May, 1898, the copy of the document of 1896 appears to have been suplied … favour of the present defendant the four successive documents, Exhibits 59, 60, 61 and 62, under which the defendant claims to hold the lands in … a scheduled district. It had been transferred to the British Government in 1861, Bombay Gazetteer, 253. The Minors' Act XX of 1864 was not in force in that district in 1877--vide Section 5 and Schedule 3 of

The King Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Cal257

of the prosecution was as follows:That the accused and three other persons made their appearance at the Sankaritolla Post Office at about 3-30 P.M., on the 3rd of August 1923 armed with firearms, that three of them including … the Post Office with that intention to rob and if necessary to kill and death resulted from their act, if that be so, you are bound to find a verdict of guilty.I say if you doubt that … Bombay High Court, Westrop, C.J., in Imperatrix v. Pitambor [1877] 2 Bom. 61 apparently inclined to the view contrary to that adopted by Stephen, J. … Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty