Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 60 · Page 1 of about 257 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 2009

Punadipadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : ServiceTrusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 31(1), 32(3), 32(7), 34, 34A, 50, 51, 52, 53, 60, 62, 62(3), 64, 66, 70, 71, 73, 76 and 117; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Married Women's Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 53; Nisi Rules

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT228

v. State 1954 All LJ 822 while interpreting the words 'wilfully detains' occurring in Section 53 of the Post Office Act, 1898 observed that the word 'wilful' has been used by the Legislature to mean only such detention which was … on record and the findings recorded by the Tribunal and also further explained the scope and ambit of Section 60 of the Act.11. Sri B. Audinarayana Rao also pointed out to the relevant portions of the order under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2012

M. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. Union of India Rep by the Director of Postal S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Decided on : May-04-2012

Subject : Education

the offence committed under section 409, 467 and 471 of IPC read with section 52 of (The Indian) Post Office Act, 1898. The said criminal case is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1 in Crime No. 4and5/2010. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1985

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vasan Publications P. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5, 9(1), 9(2), 32, 32(1), 143(3), 147, 259(2) and 263; Income Tax Rules, 1962; Post Office Act, 1898; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867

Reported in : (1986)52CTR(Mad)354; [1986]159ITR381(Mad)

that case could not rely on the fact that this monthly was registered as a "newspaper" under the Post Office Act and the Press and Registration of Books Act. They, however, held that "Cuttack Law Times" was not entitled … Books Act 1867 the working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 the Indian Post Offices Act, 1898, Parliamentary Proceedings (Protection and Public action) Act, 1956, the Delivery of Books and Newspapers Act, 1954, and the … at 10%. Later, the Income-tax Officer in the revised assessments made under section 147(b) read with section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, added back … that order, viz., P. S. V. Iyer v. CST [1960] 11 STC 608, would not apply to the case before it. The Tribunal then proceeded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 1964

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … or delay of a postal article by an officer of the post office in one of the several sections which create offences under this Act. There are 21 such sections, being sections 49 (1)31 Ch. D. 174. … fine. The offences under Ss. 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 68 and 69 are made punishable also with imprisonment. Of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2011

Superintendent, Sub-post Office Vs. Madanchandra Gupta

Court : Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Bhopal

Decided on : Jul-05-2011

Subject : MRTP

non delivery of the postal article and referred to the exemption granted by Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act. 1898 and Rule 66B of the Post Office Speed Post Rules. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant has referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2001

Senior Supdt. of Post Office Vs. K.S. Yadav

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Aug-27-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

41, Sector 31-D, Chandigarh v. Sr. Superintendent of Post Office, SCF, 59, 60, Sector 30-D, Chandigarh. 2. The District Forum-I has allowed the complaint case … passed by it which resulted in miscarriage of justice. He further alleged that once the remedy under Indian Post Office Act is specifically barred, the Consumer Forums cannot grant the remedy. Thus, the order of the District Forum-I is … complainant. The learned Counsel for the appellant has relied on the Section 6 of the Indian Post Offices Act, 1898, which reads as under : “The Government shall not incur any liability by reasons of late, misdelivery or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2013

Union of India Through Chief Post Master General Chandigarh Vs. Arman ...

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Decided on : Jan-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

The appeal was filed by the appellants on the grounds that as per Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, the complaint of the respondent was not maintainable, the correct address was not mentioned by the respondent in … and the appellants were directed to pay Rs. 3000/- as consolidated amount of compensation to the respondent within 60 days from the receipt of the copy of the order. 6. The appeal was filed by the appellants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2015

Anant Tulshiramji Bajaj Vs. Sunil

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

received by, the tenant." "11. The High Court, in our view, has also misinterpreted Section 27 of the Post Office Act, 1898. The requirement of the section has been complied with in this case. The reasoning of the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2025

Sri.Shrikant S/O Bhavu Desai vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-19-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

last known residence, address or place of business and [registered under sections 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898)] [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 7, for " registered under Part III of … HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.100055 OF 2019 BETWEEN:1. SRI. SHRIKANT S/O. BHAVU DESAI AGE. 60 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE2. SMT. HIRA W/O. BHAVU DESAIAGE. 78 YEARSO OCC. HOUSEHOLD BOTH ARE R/O. AKETHI VILLAGE TQ.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2014

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gopal Gram Seva Sahakari Mandli Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-02-2014

Subject : Direct Taxation

development bank); or (c) a Post Office as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898), there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, … the corresponding provision aforesaid and shall continue in force accordingly; (l) any notification issued under sub-section (1) of section 60 or section 60A of the repealed Act and in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial