Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 57 · Page 1 of about 205 results (0.104 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 1956

Bhikajee Dadabhai and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-1956

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1), 45 and 46; Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 35(3), 40, 40(1), 40(4), 57 and 58; ;Hyderabad General Clauses Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excises Act, 1944; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; ;Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7, 16, 19 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [1958]33ITR760(AP)

(3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India, except for the first four which were not extended to … in these Acts relating to the recovery by this procedure. While sections 57 and 58 of the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, corresponding to sections 45 and … J.P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J. 1. This is a reference of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at Bombay under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act referring the following three questions for our opinion, viz., :'1. Whether on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2013

Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Nit, Faridabad and Another Vs. Mahabir Pras ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (short, District Forum) took Preliminary Objections that : Under Section 6 of œThe Indian Post Office Act, 1898?, the post office is exempted from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal article in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2008

P. Baskaran Vs. Ayyakannu Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-22-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rules 17, 19, 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : AIR2009Mad114

the said judgment goes thus:15. The High Court, in our view, has also misinterpreted Section 27 of the Post Office Act, 1898. The requirement of the section has been complied with in this case. The reasoning of the High Court … for the petitioner cites the Full Bench decision of this Court reported in AIR 1970 MAD 271 (V 57 Court 77), Parasurama Odayar v. Appadurai Chetty and Ors., in which this Court has laid down the principles

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 2019

Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under sections 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898). 57 xxx xxx 31. Payment of compensation or deposit of same in Court.- (1) On … is available if lands are acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, is bad in law, and consequently that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956 be struck down as being violative of Article 14 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 1981

Harlal Vaishya Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-23-1981

Subject : Sales TaxLimitation

Reported in : 1981MPLJ706; [1983]53STC271(MP)

the authority concerned. The handing over of the memorandum of appeal or revision by the assessee to the post office on the last day of limitation for sending the same by registered post to the appellate or revisional … Dube, J.1. The petitioner desiring to file a revision under Section 39 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, sent his revision application by registered post on 7th October, 1976. The limitation for revision is one … dealer to make a revision application within the prescribed period. Under Rule 57(4) a revision application has to be, as far as possible, in form

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2017

Rakesh Kumar Paul Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2017

Subject : Criminal

authority. Telephonic conversation records revealed that Nabakanta Patir was in contact with a candidate regarding appointment for the post of BDO also for the year 2016. Some other recoveries were also made from his office and the … Section 167 of the Cr.P.C.10. The Code of Criminal Procedure enacted in 1898 contained Section 167 which laid down the procedure to be followed in … custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty-four hours fixed by section 57, and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is well-founded, the officer in charge of … the justice of the case should persuade us to decide otherwise. 1 Act 1 Scene III line 20-32 1 2. The facts in these petitions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1915

Mathura Mohan Saha and ors. Vs. Ramkumar Saha and Chittagong District ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-24-1915

Subject : Property

Reported in : 35Ind.Cas.305

though an attempt is made in the oral evidence to show that a clerk of the District Board Office verbally communicated the substance of the order of the Chairman to an officer of Ramkumar Saha. The fact … to excavate another tank. The result was that, on the 7th March 1898, the District Board decided to abandon the project; but as possession of … Chunder Sircar v. Dhunpul Singh 24 C. 20 and that, at any rate, the trial should have been postponed to enable the appellants to complete their title by securing a duly executed instrument from the District Board … 15th June 1897, the usual declaration was published under the Land Acquisition Act; the land was, in due course, delivered to and became vested in … at liberty to withdraw from the acquisition under Section 48 (1) of Act I of 1894. The … 937; Frend v. Dennett (1858) 4 C.B. (N.S.) 576 : 114 R.R. 859 : 5 L.T. 73

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2013

Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt.of U.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1861, 1872, 1882 and 1898 stressed as to why the compulsory registration of FIR is mandatory. He … he prayed that the provisions of Sections 41, 57, 156, 157, 159, 167, 190, 200 and 202 … of medical doctors in the aforementioned cases of Santosh Kumar and Suresh Gupta where preliminary inquiry had been postulated before registering an FIR. Some counsel also submitted that the CBI Manual also envisages some kind of preliminary … OF2008JUDGMENT P.Sathasivam, CJI.1) The important issue which arises for consideration in the referred matter is whether “a police officer is bound to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receiving any information relating to commission of a … officer in-charge of the police station concerned who did not take any action on the same. Thereafter, when the Superintendent of Police was moved, an … relating to commission of a cognizable offence under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2013

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUDGE March 18, 2013 (R.P.NAGRATH) Vishal Shonkar JUDGE CRM-790-MA-2010 final - 86 - Annexure ‘A’ 1 The Indian Post Office Act”2. Indian Electricity Act”3. Indian Medical Degrees Act”4. Official Secrets Act”5. Reserve Bank of India Act”6. Payment of … to appeal against acquittal to anyone including the State. It was in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 that Section 417 was inserted enabling the Government to direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to … Appeal under proviso to Section 372 of the Code. CRM-790-MA-2010 final - 57 - (D) Whether presentation of appeal against acquittal is a 'right' or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1974

Vishnu Krishna Belurkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1974

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR627; 1974MhLJ789

(appellant No. 2 in the appeal) were respectively working as a Junior Assistant and a Draughtsman in the Office of the Arbitrator. In the concerned locality one Omprakash. Mundada the, complainant owned a plot bearing S. No. … to accused No. 2 in the latter's office and that therefore necessary action he taken. This complaint was produced at the trial at exh. 28. … single Judge for disposal according to law. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 162, 161, 103, 174, 154--Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872), Sections … of Ramktehan Mithanlal v. State of Bombay (1934) 57 Bom. L.R. 600. popularly known as the Lloyds … No. 3 which were deposed to by punch Bendre in his deposition did not find place in the post-trap panchanama (exh, 34) and such omission introduced a serious infirmity in the prosecution case, and as such the … in any manner hit by the provisions of Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial