Advanced Search Results

Bholanath Amritlal Purohit Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 55 and 72; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 173 and 197;

Reported in : AIR1971SC194; 1971CriLJ258; (1970)2SCC414; [1971]1SCR817

fried and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, 1st Court, Broach under Section 55 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month and

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … 56 make certain acts done fraudulently, knowingly or with intent, punishable with imprisonment upto two years or fine. Section 55 makes the fraudulent altering or secreting or destroying of a document which an officer of the post office

Mohanan and ors. Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulations of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 - Sections 2, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 72; Railways Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966; Railway Protection Officers Act - Sections 8; Orissa (Schedule Area) Money Lenders Regulation, 1967; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 155(2), 173, 173(2), 195(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 55 and 72

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1709; 2008(1)KLJ445

v. State of Gujarat : 1971CriLJ258 , cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 55 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 was taken on a police report filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Under Section 72 of the said Act

M/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … Gazette and shall thereupon have the same effect as if it had formed part of the Act. Under Section 55 of the Act powers have been conferred on the appropriate Government and on the Central Government to make

Living Media India Limited and anr. Vs. Office of the Chief Postmater ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT228; 2007(96)DRJ583

the case of Competition Success Review (supra). In that decision the provisions of Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 as well as Clause 139 of the Posts Office Guide, Part-I were examined. Apart from these, two circulars … happened is that the booklet, which is a multi-page advertisement, which also contains a calendar, is page numbered 55-82. On page 1 of the magazine itself there is a reference to the Toyota Dream Car Art Contest.

Hangamabai Vs. Zamsing Deosing and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 55; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Rules, 1947 - Rule 4; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Indian Law

Reported in : AIR1955Bom436; (1955)57BOMLR875; ILR1955Bom993

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent, when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course, if there … and presented in the prescribed manner.' The manner has been prescribed by the rules framed by Government under Section 55 of the Act, and when we turn to the relevant rule, vie., Rule 4, the mode of presentation

Mahabirprasad S. Deora and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3, 21, 52 and 55; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Bom142; 1995(3)BomCR640; 1996(1)MhLj1013

by the Director General in exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (3) of Section 21 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.By Notification, the Director General made the order to be called as 'Delivery of Mail Order 1991' and the … Section 52 provides for penalty for theft, dishonest misappropriation, secretion, destruction or throwing away of postal articles while Section 55 provides for penalty for fraud in connection with official marks and for receipt of excess postage. It is

P. Sankaran Pillai Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.496

period of further imprisonment to three months. Post Office Act (VI of 1898), Sections 55, 72 - Prosecution under Section 55--Sanction of Director-General, whether condition … the charge of having fraudulently prepared the V.P. Register with which he was charged under Section 477-A and Section 55 of the Post Office Act, he was sentenced to one year. If the fine was not paid he … and a fine of Rs. 100 under Section 409, Indian Penal Code, read with Section 52 of the Post Office Act and on the charge of having fraudulently prepared the V.P. Register with which he was charged under Section

Surajmani Srimali Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 48(1979)CLT625; 1980CriLJ363

v. State of Gujarat 1970 SCC (Cri) 469, the accused was convicted under Section 55 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Cognizance of the offence had been taken on a charge-sheet submitted by the police. The conviction was challenged

Sunil Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Prin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(supra), the trial and conviction had been of offences under Section 381 IPC and Section 52 of the Post Office Act, 1898. In the case of Gagan Kumar (supra), offences were under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC. These decisions, essentially … of punishments and execution thereof, including the ancillary aspects referable to Sections 433 and 433A CrPC as also Section 55 IPC whereunder, serving of a term of 14 years even in the sentence of imprisonment for life is