Advanced Search Results

Radhakishan Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 52; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 467 and 471; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103 and 165

Reported in : AIR1963SC822; (1963)IILLJ667SC; [1963]Supp(1)SCR408

a postman attached to the Bulandshahr post office was tried for offences under s. 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (VI of 1898), and in two of them, also for offences under Sections 467 and 471 of the … with the postal article with respect to which he is alleged to have committed any of those acts. Section 52 of the Act runs thus : 'Penalty for theft, dishonest, misappropriation, secretion, destruction, or throwing away of postal

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … was deliberate and for some purpose. It is interesting to notice in this connection that in the, preceding section 52 the legislature after making punishable the offence of theft of a postal article or of dishonest misappropriation of

In Re: Govindan Nair

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103, 165 and 165(5); Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1959Mad544; 1958CriLJ777

- conviction - Sections 103, 165 and 165 (5) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 52 of Post Office Act, 1898 - Session Judge convicted accused under Section 52 - appeal - conviction of accused under Section 52 irreproachable

Queen-empbess Vs. Dolegobind Dass

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1901)ILR28Cal211

Magitrates, charged with offences under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. He was discharged on the same day, the Bench considering that the evidence was insufficient to warrant 'a

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … is submitted by the learned counsel, is prescribed by Rules 9 and 52 but since the procedure prescribed under Rule 9 and/or 52 was not … Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1944') was extended to the State of Rajasthan by Section 11 of the Finance Act of 1950, i.e., before April 1, 1950. The plaintiff averred that by a

N.L. Angshung Anal Vs. State of Manipur

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 37, 42 and 50; Post Offices Act - Sections 52; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 43, 103, 165 and 439; Criminal Law

of which was produced by the father. The appellant, Radhakishan was tried and convicted of an offence under Section 52 of the Post Offices Act, for secreting Postal articles. One of the contentions raised on behalf of the … being in contravention with the requirements of Section 165, Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, that provision cease to have any application to the subsequent steps in … the petitioner first drew my attention to Section 42 of the N.D.P.S. Act and submitted that except the officers mentioned therein, none has any authority whatsoever under the law to arrest the petitioner or make any search

Mahabirprasad S. Deora and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3, 21, 52 and 55; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Bom142; 1995(3)BomCR640; 1996(1)MhLj1013

by the Director General in exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (3) of Section 21 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.By Notification, the Director General made the order to be called as 'Delivery of Mail Order 1991' and the … the provisions of sections 52 and 55 unworkable. We are unable to find any merit in the contention. Section 52 provides for penalty for theft, dishonest misappropriation, secretion, destruction or throwing away of postal articles while Section 55

M. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. Union of India Rep by the Director of Postal S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Education

the offence committed under section 409, 467 and 471 of IPC read with section 52 of (The Indian) Post Office Act, 1898. The said criminal case is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1 in Crime No. 4and5/2010. The

Prasanth vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

said Syamala. Hence, it is alleged that the petitioner committed the offence under Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.Crl.M.C.No.4870 of 2013 33. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.4. When this Crl.M.C was

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South, Bombay Vs. Ogale Glass W ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 50

Reported in : AIR1954SC429; (1954)56BOMLR1196; [1954]24CompCas520(SC); [1954]25ITR259(SC); [1955]1SCR185

English law, delivery to the addressee. But that, Sri Kolah maintains, is not the position under the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. We have been taken through the different sections of that Act and the rules made thereunder and Sri … buyer ?' 28. The decision in Comber v. Leyland L.R. [1898] A.C. 524, is very important for our purpose in that it explains the meaning … drawn on a bank in Bombay and had been cashed in Bombay and accordingly taxed the assessee under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act. On appeal by the assessee the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the assessment.