Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 48 · Page 1 of about 249 results (0.089 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 1992

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Sarup Saini and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-31-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 48; Punjab Courts Act - Sections 41

Reported in : (1993)103PLR62

India in this civil revision.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that under Section 48(d) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short the Act), Union of India is not liable to pay the amount. In order to appreciate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1957

Dominion of India Vs. Mathura Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-10-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 34 and 48

Reported in : AIR1958All148

accordingly dismiss both ofthem with costs. Civil - post office services - Proviso 48(c) of Section 34 0f Post Office Act, 1898 - protection of 48(c) claimed by Government - money has been received by agent - omission on agent's

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1998

M/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … dismissed the challenge of L&T; Ltd. in SCA 5171/91 for withdrawal from acquisition by the State Government under Section 48 of the Act. In all these matters, different notifications under Section 4 of the Act were issued as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 25 2011

Post Master, Nagakudaiyan Branch, Vedaranniyam Division and Another Vs ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

District Forum erroneously allowed the complaint without taking in to the provisions under Section 48-C of the Indian Post Office Act 1898 and non joinder of parties. Hence complaint to be dismissed.7. While considering both sides arguments, averments and contentions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2003

Post Master, General Post Office and Others Vs. Mohd. Naim

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

material facts and that the complaint, in view of the provisions contained in Section 48 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, was not maintainable. It was further stated that as the payee refused to receive the payment of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2009

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-2009

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order … in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Patney and Co. : (1959) 36 ITR 488 : AIR 1959 SC 1070. We are not inclined to accept this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2011

Postal Superintendent O/O Postal Department Kurnool Division Vs. Dr. K ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-14-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

part and the claim was barred by limitation as also there was immunity under section 48 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and as per clause 81 of Post office Guide. 6. The point for consideration is whether the respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2012

The Superintendent of Post Offices Solan Division and Another Vs. Ram ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

Decided on : Jan-04-2012

Subject : MRTP

submitted by learned counsel representing the appellants that in view of provisions of Section 48(C) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, appellants enjoy immunity against legal proceedings on account of any accidental neglect, omission or mistake in the payment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2014

Corporation of the City of Panaji, by Its Commissioner Vs. the Deputy ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Mar-05-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and service of it may be proved by the production of the addressee's receipt. 19. Though the learned … a consequence of the letters of the petitioner dated 06/09/2010 and 09/03/2011. The Government exercised its powers under Section 48(1) of the Act and withdrew from acquisition vide notification dated 23/07/2012 bearing no. 22/23/2007-RD/3061 published in the newspaper

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2012

Superintendent of Post Offices, Palamau and Others Vs. Satyajeet Choub ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-26-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

were different and also that case pertained to postal article as covered by section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The present case is governed by the provisions of section 48 of the said Act which is applicable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial