Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Sarup Saini and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-31-1992
Civil
Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 48; Punjab Courts Act - Sections 41
(1993)103PLR62
India in this civil revision.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that under Section 48(d) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short the Act), Union of India is not liable to pay the amount. In order to appreciate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDominion of India Vs. Mathura Prasad
Allahabad
Sep-10-1957
Civil
Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 34 and 48
AIR1958All148
accordingly dismiss both ofthem with costs. Civil - post office services - Proviso 48(c) of Section 34 0f Post Office Act, 1898 - protection of 48(c) claimed by Government - money has been received by agent - omission on agent's
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-1998
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96
1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339
last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … dismissed the challenge of L&T; Ltd. in SCA 5171/91 for withdrawal from acquisition by the State Government under Section 48 of the Act. In all these matters, different notifications under Section 4 of the Act were issued as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Post Master, Nagakudaiyan Branch, Vedaranniyam Division and Another Vs ...
Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Oct-25-2011
Land Acquisition
District Forum erroneously allowed the complaint without taking in to the provisions under Section 48-C of the Indian Post Office Act 1898 and non joinder of parties. Hence complaint to be dismissed.7. While considering both sides arguments, averments and contentions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPost Master, General Post Office and Others Vs. Mohd. Naim
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
May-30-2003
Land Acquisition
material facts and that the complaint, in view of the provisions contained in Section 48 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, was not maintainable. It was further stated that as the payee refused to receive the payment of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner
Allahabad
May-28-2009
Service
2009(4)AWC3302
on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order … in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Patney and Co. : (1959) 36 ITR 488 : AIR 1959 SC 1070. We are not inclined to accept this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPostal Superintendent O/O Postal Department Kurnool Division Vs. Dr. K ...
Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Nov-14-2011
Land Acquisition
part and the claim was barred by limitation as also there was immunity under section 48 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and as per clause 81 of Post office Guide. 6. The point for consideration is whether the respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Superintendent of Post Offices Solan Division and Another Vs. Ram ...
Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
Jan-04-2012
MRTP
submitted by learned counsel representing the appellants that in view of provisions of Section 48(C) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, appellants enjoy immunity against legal proceedings on account of any accidental neglect, omission or mistake in the payment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorporation of the City of Panaji, by Its Commissioner Vs. the Deputy ...
Mumbai Goa
Mar-05-2014
Land Acquisition
last known residence, address or place of business and registered under section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and service of it may be proved by the production of the addressee's receipt. 19. Though the learned … a consequence of the letters of the petitioner dated 06/09/2010 and 09/03/2011. The Government exercised its powers under Section 48(1) of the Act and withdrew from acquisition vide notification dated 23/07/2012 bearing no. 22/23/2007-RD/3061 published in the newspaper
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendent of Post Offices, Palamau and Others Vs. Satyajeet Choub ...
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Jul-26-2012
Land Acquisition
were different and also that case pertained to postal article as covered by section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The present case is governed by the provisions of section 48 of the said Act which is applicable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »