Advanced Search Results

Hari Pandurang and anr. Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1904)ILR27Bom276

at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866.45. Nothing has been said before us as to the public notice prescribed by the Act: nor has … certain improvements were projected in the City of Bombay, and an Act called the City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898, was passed giving to a Board thereby constituted certain powers with a view to carry these improvements into … would not be protected. The observations/directions issued by Supreme Court in Para 36 of judgment in the case of State v Millind reported in 2001 … to be acquired.2. You should also produce on the above date, under Section 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a statement in writing signed

Firm Gulab Singh Johri Mal Vs. Union of India (Uoi), New Delhi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 6; Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rules 35 and 72 to 83A

Reported in : AIR1958P& H174

take delivery, that there is no liability of the defendant in view of section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and clauses 39 and 81 (2) of the Post and Telegraph Guide, and that the amount of damage … the Post Office. 2. The plaintiff-firm sent five insured parcels one No. 5 on 21-5-1943 and four Nos. 36 to 39 on 22-5-1948, from Chandani Chowk Post Office, Delhi, to Kalbadevi Post Office Bombay, for delivery to

Govinda Choudhary Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Orissa

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1); Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1946 - Rules 7, 8 and 36

Reported in : AIR1960Ori187

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the post office was his agent, when in fact there was no such reclamation; of course, if there … Income-tax Act (Act XI of 1932) read with Rules 7, 8 and 36 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1946, the said applications were barred by … this reference tor decision of this Full Bench is one of limitation, arising out of two applications under Section 66(3) of the Income-tax Act (Act XI of 1922), -- S. J. C. No. 4 of 1956 relating

Ram Gopal Mola Ram and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 295 and 295(1); Jaipur Excess Profits Tax Act, 1944

Reported in : AIR1966P& H540; [1967]64ITR419(P& H)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal shall not affect … may prescribe.42. The amount of Excess Profits Tax recovered from any person, which has not been refunded under Section 36, and is shown to be still at this credit in the Excess Profits Tax Account kept under Section

Emperor Vs. Joti Prasad Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1932All18; 136Ind.Cas.91

Penal Code. The result therefore was that offences under the Excise Act (Act 12 of 1896), under the Post Office Act (Act 6 of 1898), under the Explosive Substances Act, (Act 6 of 1908) or the Police Act (Act … 70, Post Office Act, Section 12, Explosives Act, Section 6, Explosive Substances Act, Section 82, Registration Act and Section 36, Police Act. If therefore we read Section 40 in conjunction with the relevant penal sections of the special

Smt.V. Haritha Vs. the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,rep.by I

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

to prove that Ms.G.Hemaltha is the tenant of the petitioner. In this context, Section 3 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short 'the 1898 Act') and Rule 36 of the Rules and Regulations Relating to the Inland Post

Government of India by Secretary to the Government of India, Post and ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 100 and 101 - Order 6, Rule 4; Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 6; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1A and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101, 102, 103 and 104; Indian Succession Act - Sections 42 and 306; Factories Act, 1948; Fatal Accidents Act, 1846 - Sections 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1970Kant13; AIR1970Mys13; (1969)1MysLJ244

a truly vicarious liability: he is liable for a duty which he has broken himself. 55. The Indian Post Office Act, 1898. has granted the exclusive privilege of conveying letters to the Central Government. That exclusive privilege includes all the … plaintiffs. In Original Suit No. 37 of 1959 the trial Court awarded a sum of Rs. 15,000 under Section 1-A of the Fatal Accidents Act and Rs. 5,000 under Section 2 of the said Act. Thus a … Rupees 20,700. Jeevaraj brought Original Suit No. 38 of 1959 claiming Rs. 36,225 for personal injuries suffered. The defendants in both the suits are common;

Cesc Limited and anr. Vs. the Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 11 and 12; ;Post Office Code

Reported in : AIR2004Cal106,(2004)1CALLT362(HC),2004(2)CHN142

power or authority or jurisdiction to demand such amount from the CESC Ltd, under the provisions of Indian Post Office Act, 1898. It was further contended that since it was a bona fide mistake committed mutually by both the parties … department would be forced to direct that all postal articles would be withheld from CESC Ltd. as per Section 12 of the Post Office Act. Hence, this writ petition.6. In the writ petition it was contended that … CESC Ltd. by their letter dated November 5, 1998 appearing at page 36 of the CESC Ltd.'s paper book (hereinafter referred to as Second Paper

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … the decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Patney and Co. : (1959) 36 ITR 488 : AIR 1959 SC 1070. We are not inclined to … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order

Govinda Chowdhury Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1960]40ITR93(Orissa)

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the post was his agent, when in fact there was no such reclamation; of course, if there be … the Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) read with rules 7, 8 and 36 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1946, the said applications were barred by … point involved for decision of this full Bench is one of limitation, arising out of two applications under section 66(3) of Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S.J.C. No. 4 of 1956 relating of the assessment year 1950-51