Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm Ram Gopal Hukum Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 6 and 34; Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1960All672

Both revisions are dismissed with costs. Civil - duty of Post Office - Sections 6 and 34 of Post Office Act, 1898 - V. P. Article not delivered - post office is to bear the value of parcel - no … sender. He brought a suit to recover the value of the parcel. It was pleaded in defence that Section 34 of the Indian Post Office Act gave immunity from all liability, for it provided that (neither the Central

Union Government of India and ors. Vs. Rajamohan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 34; Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rules 101 and 102; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2001Mad172; (2001)1MLJ586

and as regards the non collection of its value under the proviso to Section 34 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The said proviso runs as follows : 'Provided that the Secretary of State for India in Council shall

Dominion of India Vs. Mathura Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 34 and 48

Reported in : AIR1958All148

accordingly dismiss both ofthem with costs. Civil - post office services - Proviso 48(c) of Section 34 0f Post Office Act, 1898 - protection of 48(c) claimed by Government - money has been received by agent - omission on agent's

Dominion of India Through the Secretary I/C of Posts and Telegraph Dep ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1951All617

for revision it is contended that the Dominion Govt. is, by virtue of the proviso to Section 34, Post Office Act, 1898, absolved from all liability. That section enacts that : 'The Central Govt. may, by notification in the Official

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mohd. Nazim

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 182 and 191; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 34; Indian Post Office Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : AIR1980SC431; (1980)1SCC284; [1980]1SCR968; 1979(11)LC907(SC)

this was the reason why the sum could not be paid to the plaintiff. Reference was made to Section 34 of the Indian Post Office Article, 1898 and it was claimed that the said provision absolved the Union … booking of the value-payable articles, was not admissible under Rule 102 of the Rules framed under the Indian Post Office Act which fixed a time-limit of one year 'from the date of the posting of the articles' for making

Sk. Mahammed HussaIn Vs. Deputy Collector and Magistrate, 1st Class an ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 12 and 34

Reported in : AIR1975Ori36

a writ of certiorari quashing Annexure 1 which is an order issued under Section 12 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Post Master General, Orissa empowering the … is not recoverable under Section 12 of the Act. In support of this contention reference is made to Section 34 of the Act which may be extracted : '34. Transmission by post of value-payable postal articles.-- The Central

Radhe Lal Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1924)ILR46All455

Secretary of State sought to avoid liability on the basis of Sections 6 and 34 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. I think the court below was right in holding that Section 6 did not apply in this case

Punadipadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceTrusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 31(1), 32(3), 32(7), 34, 34A, 50, 51, 52, 53, 60, 62, 62(3), 64, 66, 70, 71, 73, 76 and 117; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Married Women's Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 53; Nisi Rules

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT228

v. State 1954 All LJ 822 while interpreting the words 'wilfully detains' occurring in Section 53 of the Post Office Act, 1898 observed that the word 'wilful' has been used by the Legislature to mean only such detention which was … constituted under Section 31(1)(a), and a person-in-charge appointed under Section 32(7)(a), and also a Special Officer appointed under Section 34 of this Act.]22. Thereafter, the first respondent-Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, issued surcharge order, dated 21.01.2004, under Section

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

this was the reason why the sum could not be paid to the plaintiff. Reference was made to Section 34 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and it was claimed that said provision absolved the Union of … on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there

Hari Pandurang and anr. Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1904)ILR27Bom276

at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866.45. Nothing has been said before us as to the public notice prescribed by the Act: nor has … certain improvements were projected in the City of Bombay, and an Act called the City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898, was passed giving to a Board thereby constituted certain powers with a view to carry these improvements into … to be acquired.2. You should also produce on the above date, under Section 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a statement in writing signed … of which Flower v. Local Board of Low Leyton (1877) 5 Ch.D. 347 is a type, were cited to us. It was further said that