Advanced Search Results

Union of India and Another Vs. D. Venkaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 and that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 is a bar to maintainability of the complaint and as per the provisions of Clauses 184 and 172 … Offices, Osmanabad and Post Master, Murudu and sent a telegram to the Post Master, Dilsukhnagar Post Office, on 3.7.1995, for which a reply was received from Superintendent of Post Offices, Osmanabad regretting for the loss of registered

NitIn Rashmikant Kantawala Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property Miscellaneous

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3 and 21(3); Bombay Rent Act

Reported in : AIR1997SC892; JT1997(2)SC645; 1997(2)SCALE11; (1997)4SCC72; [1997]1SCR740; 1997(1)LC532(SC)

Posts and Telegraphs in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3) of Section 21 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') vide notification dated May 29, 1991. The 1991 Order was issued to

Bhikha Lal and ors. Vs. Munna Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1); Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 44 and 44(1)

Reported in : AIR1974All366

Gupta and A. K. Kirty, JJ. in which the view taken was that Section 44 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as the Post Office Act) 'contains clear statutory recognition of the principle that the post … and in the circumstances of the case the tenant could be said to have committed a default under Section 3 (1) (a) of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act in respect of the payment

Bhikajee Dadabhai and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1), 45 and 46; Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 35(3), 40, 40(1), 40(4), 57 and 58; ;Hyderabad General Clauses Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excises Act, 1944; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; ;Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7, 16, 19 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [1958]33ITR760(AP)

(3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India, except for the first four which were not extended to … J.P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J. 1. This is a reference of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at Bombay under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act referring the following three questions for our opinion, viz., :'1. Whether on

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Madhumita Sarkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Contract Act - Section 4; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

of power under Clause 5.11. Mr. Gupta next refers to the provision of Section 3(c) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 which runs as follows:3. Meanings of 'in course of transmission by post' and 'delivery'. - For the purposes

Deoneria Cold Storage and Ice Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 88; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(All)39; [2003]260ITR315(All)

to ensure that the declaration reaches the designated authority by the prescribed date.10. Section 3(a) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, states :'(a) a postal article shall be deemed to be in course of transmission by post from the

Union of India Through Its Department of Posts Service Vs. Kashmir Sin ...

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Subject : Education

order, opposite party No.1 has come up in appeal on the ground that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 provides that the Government as well as opposite party No.1 are exempted from liability for the loss, mis-delivery … held, were despatched by opposite party No.2 on 10.8.2009 but the same was delivered to the complaints on 31.8.2009 due to which they could not appear in the exam, which was scheduled for 25.8.2009, 28.8.2009 and 31.8.2009.

Mahabirprasad S. Deora and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 3, 21, 52 and 55; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Bom142; 1995(3)BomCR640; 1996(1)MhLj1013

by the Director General in exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (3) of Section 21 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.By Notification, the Director General made the order to be called as 'Delivery of Mail Order 1991' and the

Rajsekhar Babu Vs. Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Hyderabad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 9, 9(3), 10, 12, 12(2), 18 and 18(2); Re Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1906; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : AIR1992AP193; 1992(1)ALT105

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Ss. 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.' 11. A close reading of sub-section (3) of S. 9 makes it clear that it is incumbent on

Naba Mudran Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Chief Post Master General and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 2, 3 and 10; ;Universal Postal Union Rules; ;Letter Post Regulations

Reported in : AIR2006Cal30,2006(3)CHN729

I am unable to agree with counsel for the petitioners that in view of provisions of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, Section 2(f), 3 and 10, postal authorities of this country are under a statutory obligation to accept and forward