Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 16 · Page 1 of about 855 results (0.132 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 1956

Bhikajee Dadabhai and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-1956

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1), 45 and 46; Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 35(3), 40, 40(1), 40(4), 57 and 58; ;Hyderabad General Clauses Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excises Act, 1944; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; ;Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7, 16, 19 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [1958]33ITR760(AP)

(3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India, except for the first four which were not extended to … of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act which gave a person aggrieved by an order under section 7, section 16, section 19 or section 38 a right of appeal to the Custodian and the Custodian General observed at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1998

M/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … Section 39 falling in Part VII, the provisions of Sections 6 to 16 and Sections 18 to 37 shall not be put in force in … dismissed the challenge of L&T; Ltd. in SCA 5171/91 for withdrawal from acquisition by the State Government under Section 48 of the Act. In all these matters, different notifications under Section 4 of the Act were issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2009

Punadipadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : ServiceTrusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 31(1), 32(3), 32(7), 34, 34A, 50, 51, 52, 53, 60, 62, 62(3), 64, 66, 70, 71, 73, 76 and 117; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Married Women's Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 53; Nisi Rules

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT228

v. State 1954 All LJ 822 while interpreting the words 'wilfully detains' occurring in Section 53 of the Post Office Act, 1898 observed that the word 'wilful' has been used by the Legislature to mean only such detention which was … or order made under Section 6, Section 9A, Section 9B, Section 9C, Section 12A, Section 13, Section 15A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 19, Section 21, Section 21A, Section 21AA, Section 23, Sub-section (3) of Section 32, Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 04 2013

Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Nit, Faridabad and Another Vs. Mahabir Pras ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (short, District Forum) took Preliminary Objections that : Under Section 6 of œThe Indian Post Office Act, 1898?, the post office is exempted from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal article in … dismissed being devoid of any merit.? Hence the revision petition. Revision petition has been filed with delay of 16 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the delay is condoned. We have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2012

Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices Bangalore South Division and Anothe ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Apr-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

is only entitled for compensation amounting to double the charges. Further, as per Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short as Act) petitioners can not incur any liability by reason of loss, mis-delivery or delay of, … Redressal Commission, Bangalore (for short as State Commission). Vide impugned order, appeal of the petitioners challenging order dated 16.11.2010, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore (for short as District Forum ) was dismissed. 2. Along

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2012

Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices Bangalore South Division and Anothe ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Apr-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

is only entitled for compensation amounting to double the charges. Further, as per Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short as Act) petitioners can not incur any liability by reason of loss, mis-delivery or delay of, … Redressal Commission, Bangalore (for short as State Commission). Vide impugned order, appeal of the petitioners challenging order dated 16.11.2010, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore (for short as District Forum ) was dismissed. 2. Along

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2009

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-2009

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … be denied of opportunity to be considered for employment guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution of India in respect of the vacancies advertised by … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 11(2), 12

writ petition and held that the demand notice dated 10.9.1999 is contrary to Section 11(2) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and remitted the matter with a direction to the Postal Authority to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Madhumita Sarkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Contract Act - Section 4; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

of power under Clause 5.11. Mr. Gupta next refers to the provision of Section 3(c) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 which runs as follows:3. Meanings of 'in course of transmission by post' and 'delivery'. - For the purposes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1995

R. Vinothkumar Vs. the Secretary, Selection Committee and 3 ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC401; (1995)IIMLJ158

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent, when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … and the posted as received in the Post Office at Madras on 16.7.1994 and delivered to the Office of the Selection Committee on 19.7 1994 … that if reasoning of my learned brother contained in paragraphs 24 and 25 of his judgment referring to Section 50 of the India Contract Act and illustration (d) thereto and the ruling in Sumathi G. v. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial