Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 11 · Page 1 of about 1,133 results (0.124 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 11 2012

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 11(2), 12

writ petition and held that the demand notice dated 10.9.1999 is contrary to Section 11(2) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and remitted the matter with a direction to the Postal Authority to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

Cesc Limited and anr. Vs. the Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 11 and 12; ;Post Office Code

Reported in : AIR2004Cal106,(2004)1CALLT362(HC),2004(2)CHN142

power or authority or jurisdiction to demand such amount from the CESC Ltd, under the provisions of Indian Post Office Act, 1898. It was further contended that since it was a bona fide mistake committed mutually by both the parties … hand let us first discuss the relevant provisions of the Act as well as rules and/or guidelines.13. Under Section 11 of the said Act deficit postage for any particular postal article was to be recovered from the addressee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1998

J. Rajyalakshmi and ors. Vs. Land Aquisition Officer, Huda, Hyd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 8, 9(1 and 3), 10, 11, 18, 25 and 30; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD644; 1998(6)ALT140

last known residence, address or place of business and (registered under Section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898)' 4. So, it is clear that Section 9 is intended to give notice about the … put forth their claims.5. Section 25 provides Rules as to claiming compensation before Collector or the Court under Section 11 of the Act. Section 11 deals with conducting enquiry into measurements, claims, value and passing of award by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 07 1980

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-07-1980

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1944') was extended to the State of Rajasthan by Section 11 of the Finance Act of 1950, i.e., before April 1, 1950. The plaintiff averred that by a notice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1997

Union of India and Another Vs. D. Venkaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-08-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

satisfied that the opposite parties are not protected under Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. 11. Reliance is placed on the decision of National Commission in Presidency Post Master and Another v.Dr. U. Shankar … service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 and that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 is a bar to maintainability of the complaint and as per the provisions of Clauses 184 and 172

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2007

State of Maharashtra Vs. Annaji Ganesh Kulkarni

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 8, 9, 9(1) to 9(3), 9(3)(4), 11, 18, 25 and 25(2); Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR775; 2007(4)MhLj853

last known residence, address or place of business and [registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898)].Sub-section (2) of Section 9 contemplates that a public notice under Sub-section (1) of Section 9 … Act of 1894 was issued on 1st January, 1979. The Award was made on 30th April, 1982 under Section 11 of the said Act of 1894. By the impugned Judgment and Award, the learned trial Judge granted enhancement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2011

Post Master, Nagakudaiyan Branch, Vedaranniyam Division and Another Vs ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

District Forum erroneously allowed the complaint without taking in to the provisions under Section 48-C of the Indian Post Office Act 1898 and non joinder of parties. Hence complaint to be dismissed.7. While considering both sides arguments, averments and contentions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1955

N. Satyanathan Vs. K. Subramanyan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-1955

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 7(4)

Reported in : AIR1955SC459; [1955]2SCR83

for the transit conveyance and delivery of all postal articles and mail bags as defined in the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, as amended from time to time,........ from the 15th day of December 1949 to the 14th day of … or for any of the reasons set forth in paras. 9 to 11 of the petition 2. Has this Tribunal no jurisdiction to decide the … The only question for determination in this appeal by special leave is whether the appellant is disqualified under Section 7(d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act) for election to the house

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1961

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Bhikaji Dadabhai and Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-1961

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 11, 13(1) and 13(2); Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 40, 40(1) and 42(1); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excise Act, 1944; Indian Post Offices Act, 1898; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1961SC1265; [1961]42ITR123(SC); [1961]3SCR923

1934, the Land Customs Act, 1924, the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, and the Indian Post Offices Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India by s. 11 of the Finance Act, 1950, and the … 1357 (October 1, 1946, to September 30, 1947), the assessees returned an income of Rs. 50,384/-. The Income-tax Officer found that the books of account maintained by the assessees were unreliable and by his order dated February … against the order of the Income-tax Officer to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Section 42(1) of the Hyderabad Income-tax Act gives a right to an assessee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Madhumita Sarkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Contract Act - Section 4; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

of power under Clause 5.11. Mr. Gupta next refers to the provision of Section 3(c) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 which runs as follows:3. Meanings of 'in course of transmission by post' and 'delivery'. - For the purposes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial