Advanced Search Results

The Managing Director, Apsrtc Vs. M. Kamalakumari and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6(1), 9(4), 10, 17, 17(3A) and 45(2); Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT180

his last-known residence, address or place of business and registered under Section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and service of it may be proved by the production of the addressee's receipt.' 11. At the time … Andhra Prabha respectively, and that the local publication of the draft notification was effected in the locality on 10.5.1989, whereas the draft declaration under Section 6 dated 5.5.1989 was published in the official gazette on 17.6.1989 and

In the Matter of Om Parkash Sharma, District Shimla, H.P Vs. the Chief ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

Subject : MRTP

reliance upon Annexures R.1 to R.III, which are copy of an extract of Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898; copy of registered letter which was sent to the Officer-in-charge, Admission Cell, Deans Office, Armed Forces Medical College, … no deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties in any manner and the period of 10 days which was taken in the delivery of registered letter to the addressee is reasonable period and even

Naba Mudran Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Chief Post Master General and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 2, 3 and 10; ;Universal Postal Union Rules; ;Letter Post Regulations

Reported in : AIR2006Cal30,2006(3)CHN729

I am unable to agree with counsel for the petitioners that in view of provisions of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, Section 2(f), 3 and 10, postal authorities of this country are under a statutory obligation to accept and forward

Union of India and Another Vs. D. Venkaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 and that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 is a bar to maintainability of the complaint and as per the provisions of Clauses 184 and 172 … misdelivery, delay or damage unless he has caused the same fraudulently or by his wilful act or default." 10. In the instant case the first and second opposite parties admitted the receipt of the registered letter, but

J. Rajyalakshmi and ors. Vs. Land Aquisition Officer, Huda, Hyd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 8, 9(1 and 3), 10, 11, 18, 25 and 30; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD644; 1998(6)ALT140

last known residence, address or place of business and (registered under Section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898)' 4. So, it is clear that Section 9 is intended to give notice about the … in possession of the land having raised some constructions. However, the Land Acquisition Officer passed an award No. 10 of 86 dated 23-9-1986 without reference to the petitioners' possession and compensation has been deposited in Civil Court

Rajsekhar Babu Vs. Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Hyderabad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 9, 9(3), 10, 12, 12(2), 18 and 18(2); Re Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1906; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : AIR1992AP193; 1992(1)ALT105

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Ss. 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.' 11. A close reading of sub-section (3) of S. 9 makes it clear that it is incumbent on … of the petitioners is that the award inquiry was conducted without giving any notice under Ss. 9(3) and 10 of the Act to them. Even after passing of the award no notice as contemplated under S. 12(2)

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … of the notice and also issiud certificates of recovery under Section 11 of the Act of 1944 and Section 10 of the Ordinance of 1949. It is further alleged that the Superintendent, Central Excise, Jodhpur, also made an

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … or delay of a postal article by an officer of the post office in one of the several sections which create offences under this Act. There are 21 such sections, being sections 49 (1)31 Ch. D. 174. … imprisonment extending to only six months or with fine extending to Rs. 100/-. But Wilful, detention of a postal article is made punishable with imprisonment

Union of India Through Its Department of Posts Service Vs. Kashmir Sin ...

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Subject : Education

order, opposite party No.1 has come up in appeal on the ground that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 provides that the Government as well as opposite party No.1 are exempted from liability for the loss, mis-delivery … Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainants, Sh.Kashmir Singh and Sarwan Singh, appeared in 10th Class examination in March, 2009 and the former got compartment in Mathematics and Science while the later got

Economic Transport Organisation Vs. Northland Engineering Industries a ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaint was not maintainable against them in view of the specific provisions contained in Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898. It was however admitted that the registered letter was booked with opposite party No. 1-Post Office, Industrial Area, … and not in consideration of any commercial contract. The Post Office cannot be equated with a common carrier.” 10. In the case of The Post Master, Imphal v. Dr. Jamini Devi Sagolband, reported in I (2000) CPJ