Advanced Search Results

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … and such obstruction is removed or destroyed under Section ii, or its creation is regulated or prohibited under Section 8, any person having a right to maintain or create such obstruction shall be entitled to receive from the

Dy. Cit Vs. Abg Heavy Industries Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)303ITR328(Mum.)

80-1A. The assessee supported its submission by referring to the definition of "port" as given in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 according to which a "port" would include any part of the river or channel in which the said … has erred in: 1. directing the assessing officer to deduct a sum of Rs. 13,15,01,864 being deduction under Section 80-IA by holding that the assessee has carried on the business of developing, maintaining and operating any infrastructure … officer to deduct a sum of Rs. 13,15,01,864 being deduction under Section 80-IA by holding that the assessee has carried on the business of developing,

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … duty. However, on 05.03.2016, DRI sent another letter that provisional release be 8 allowed without waiting for measurement of goods. The fact however is that … in respect of the bills of entry dated 04.12.2015 and 11.12.2015 prayed that the duty be assessed under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short ‘1962 Act’) and the goods be released, so as to

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … expanded and the new States came to be formed from the appointed day i.e. 1st November 1956. Under section 8 of the Act of 1956 a new Part A State to be known as the State of Bombay

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … a subsequent notification dated 29th March, 1955 issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section (8) of Section 3 of the 1908 Act, the Port of Kandla was declared a 'Major Port' with effect

Jamshed Hormusji Wadia Vs. Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 142, 226 and 254; The Bombay Port Trust Act, 1873; The Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 381 and 381(1) - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Adhiniyam, 1959; Land Acquisition Act, 1349; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2004SC1815; 2004(176)ELT24(SC); JT2004(1)SC232; 2004(1)SCALE341; (2004)3SCC214

Mumbai, continues to be the commercial capital of the country. In spite of the development of several other ports having taken place along the coasts of India, some of them being of recent origin, the Bombay port … contemplated by Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is at all maintainable in a civil appeal by special leave under … 8657/02).2. The Bombay Port Trust (hereinafter 'BPT', for short), presently constituted and governed by the Major Port Trust Act, 1963, and now known as The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai, is an 'authority' within … Due to the availability or continuously growing modern infrastructure at Mumbai large sections of the population from throughout the country continue to migrate to Mumbai, … granted in SLP (C) Nos. 19877/01, 6064/02 & 8657/02).2. The Bombay Port Trust (hereinafter 'BPT', for short),

Paradeep Port Trust. Vs. Controlling Authority and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act - Section 1 (3); Indian Ports Act - Sections 3 (4), 2. 28, 2(a), 5, 6, 7A, 4-A, 12(11), 13, 14, 15, 2(d).

'major port' has the same meaning assigned to it in clause (8) of Section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, hereinafter referred to as the I.P. Act. The said Section 2 of clause 'n' defines 'port' has the

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Miscellaneous

the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … raised by the defendant no. 2 lies on the defendant no. 1. 8. Issues came to be framed by the trial Court as per the … for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in terms of Section 10 of the said Act the Conservator can cause obstruction to be removed within the limits of port

M/S Yazdani International P.Ltd. Vs. Auroglobal Comtrade P.Ltd.and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

is irrelevant. Paradeep Port is a major port as defined under Section 3 sub-Section (8)[1]. of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The activities of all major ports including the Paradeep Port are regulated by various enactments such as the