Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 7 · Page 1 of about 649 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 1999

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … Buildings Division Annexure 'B', Gazette notification issued by the Government of Gujarat in exercise of its powers under section 7 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1984

Pratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-1984

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Guj68

limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … addition and alteration in the said house without the permission of the authority in writing as required by section 7 of the Gandhidham Act., the same was required to be demolished. Details of unauthorised construction, addition and alteration

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … the latter of; which is unnecessary having regard to Order VII, Rule 7, of the Civil Procedure Code.11. The declaratory relief asked for is in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2007

New Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875

in several statutes including Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Indian Ports Act, 1908, as also the Dictionary meaning cited in the judgment of this Court pronounced in the case of m.v.SAABA … to hold/arrest any property. He has invited my attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act … plaintiff be directed to compensate the applicant-proposed defendant No. 4 @ Rs. 75,000/- per day with effect from 12th July 2007 until the date the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2009

Delta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 6, 31, 32, 33, 35, 46, 47 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Goa Barge Tax Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 220; Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 54, 55, 64

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110

(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … which the Act is extended by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1989

Mahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 67; Bombay Port Rules - Rules 4 and 19; Port Act, 1908 - Sections 6(1);

Reported in : AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)

have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 6(1)(k) of the Indian Ports Act 1908:6(1) The Government may, in addition to any rules which it may make under any other enactment for the … joy rides, film shootings, etc. from Apollo Pier or Gateway of India to Elephanta Island, and respondent No. 7 is a cooperative association of launch owners also engaged in the same activity. It appears that originally the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … dated 30th December, 1991 on the ground that the same was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 120 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and that the suit … 5.207.50 times of nominal plot capacity 6.407.75 times of nominal plot capacity 7.608.00 times of nominal plot capacity 8.804. Appellant had challenged the levy of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2014

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Apr-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through … Revenue on the judgment of Western Agencies Pvt. Ltd. [2008 (12) STR 739] is also incorrect as Western Agencies decision has not referred to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2000

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Jayantilal Dharamsey a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 111; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 7; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 246 and 254; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR2001Bom26; 2001(1)BomCR44; (2001)2BOMLR273

been periodical amendment to the Act and one of the amendments has the effect of virtually obliging bigger Ports likeMumbai to make use of their spare resources for the development of other major ports. The relevant provisions … mentioned later on even with reference to unamended Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the rate should be 6% per annum only. 63. Now coming to … namely the appellant is conspicuous by its absence in the new Rent Act. Reference may be made to section 7 sub-section 6 of the said Maharashtra Rent Control Act. 1999. This has generated much debate particularly at the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1961

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1961

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

for any act or default of any officer or servant appointed under this Act, or under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, if the Board be appointed by Government under the Indian Ports Act, to be Conservator of the Port, … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of … any undelivered portion of coal either under bye-laws in force under Section 7.0 of the Madras Harbour Trust Act or under and by virtue of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial