Advanced Search Results
Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others
Mumbai
Dec-02-1999
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)
AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556
Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … Buildings Division Annexure 'B', Gazette notification issued by the Government of Gujarat in exercise of its powers under section 7 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.
Gujarat
Jul-16-1984
PropertyCivil
Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1985Guj68
limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … addition and alteration in the said house without the permission of the authority in writing as required by section 7 of the Gandhidham Act., the same was required to be demolished. Details of unauthorised construction, addition and alteration
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa
Mumbai
Apr-12-1920
PropertyCivil
AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939
as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … the latter of; which is unnecessary having regard to Order VII, Rule 7, of the Civil Procedure Code.11. The declaratory relief asked for is in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-21-2007
Civil
Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75
2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875
in several statutes including Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Indian Ports Act, 1908, as also the Dictionary meaning cited in the judgment of this Court pronounced in the case of m.v.SAABA … to hold/arrest any property. He has invited my attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act … plaintiff be directed to compensate the applicant-proposed defendant No. 4 @ Rs. 75,000/- per day with effect from 12th July 2007 until the date the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-2009
Civil
Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 6, 31, 32, 33, 35, 46, 47 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Goa Barge Tax Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 220; Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 54, 55, 64
2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110
(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … which the Act is extended by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-01-1989
Constitution
Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 67; Bombay Port Rules - Rules 4 and 19; Port Act, 1908 - Sections 6(1);
AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)
have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 6(1)(k) of the Indian Ports Act 1908:6(1) The Government may, in addition to any rules which it may make under any other enactment for the … joy rides, film shootings, etc. from Apollo Pier or Gateway of India to Elephanta Island, and respondent No. 7 is a cooperative association of launch owners also engaged in the same activity. It appears that originally the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-2005
LimitationCivil
Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908
AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27
guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … dated 30th December, 1991 on the ground that the same was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 120 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and that the suit … 5.207.50 times of nominal plot capacity 6.407.75 times of nominal plot capacity 7.608.00 times of nominal plot capacity 8.804. Appellant had challenged the levy of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Apr-09-2014
Service Tax
are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through … Revenue on the judgment of Western Agencies Pvt. Ltd. [2008 (12) STR 739] is also incorrect as Western Agencies decision has not referred to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Jayantilal Dharamsey a ...
Mumbai
Aug-01-2000
TenancyProperty
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 111; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 7; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 246 and 254; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879; Land Acquisition Act, 1894
AIR2001Bom26; 2001(1)BomCR44; (2001)2BOMLR273
been periodical amendment to the Act and one of the amendments has the effect of virtually obliging bigger Ports likeMumbai to make use of their spare resources for the development of other major ports. The relevant provisions … mentioned later on even with reference to unamended Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the rate should be 6% per annum only. 63. Now coming to … namely the appellant is conspicuous by its absence in the new Rent Act. Reference may be made to section 7 sub-section 6 of the said Maharashtra Rent Control Act. 1999. This has generated much debate particularly at the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...
Chennai
Oct-26-1961
Trusts and Societies
(1962)2MLJ29
for any act or default of any officer or servant appointed under this Act, or under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, if the Board be appointed by Government under the Indian Ports Act, to be Conservator of the Port, … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of … any undelivered portion of coal either under bye-laws in force under Section 7.0 of the Madras Harbour Trust Act or under and by virtue of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »