Advanced Search Results

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … left open and in Lutchmeeput Singh v. Sadaulla Nushyo I.L.R (1882) Cal. 698. Lord Rivera v. Adama (1878) L.R. 361 was followed.72. This leaves the

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 33, 34, 49 and 52; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Director of Rationing and Distribution

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 386 and 386(1); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 3(32); ;Constitution of India - Article 300; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Cal282,1955CriLJ792

the proviso to Section 20 goods belonging to Government were expressly exempted.Section 1(4) of the now repealed Indian Ports Act of 1889 exempted-from the operation of the. Act vessels belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty … belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty or the Government of India. Section 2(l) Indian Port Act, 1908, gave the same exemption to all vessels belonging to or in the service of His Majesty which in … Act till the notification by Governor General of the signification of the assent of His Majesty in Council. Section 69 provides a further hurdle for Indian legislation before it could be placed on the Statute book. When a

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … contract voidable. Thus, while Section 10 sets out the core element for 69 an agreement to become a contract, the effect of non- conformity varies. … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Import and Export Association

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69, 69(1), 69(2), 69(3) and 69(4); Indian Companies Act, 1913; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 8 and 8(2); Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR1961Bom65; (1960)62BOMLR753

to consider the words following appearing in certain Bills of Lading:'Liberty X X X to call at any ports in any order, for bunkering or other purposes, X X X all as part of the contract voyage.'A … used in Order XXIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The words therein used are the following :'...... (2) Where the Court … of the Letters Patent for the determination of the questions following:--'Whether in view of the provisions contained in Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the present petition is maintainable and what provisions should be made for

Victory Carriers, Inc. Vs. Law

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

511, 513 (ED Wis. 1888); The H. S. Pickands, 42 F. 239, 240 (ED Mich. 1890); Hermann v. Port Blakely Mill Co., 69 F. 646, 647 (ND Cal. 1895); The Strabo, 90 F. 110, 113 (EDNY 1898); … point, the overhead protection rack of the forklift came loose and fell on him. He subsequently brought an action in a federal District Court against the ship and Victory Carriers, Inc., claiming that the unseaworthiness of the … S. 406 , 346 U. S. 410 -411 (1953), but, under either section, the claim that a ship or its gear was unseaworthy would be

Mohanan Nair P.G. vs Omallur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.No.Q 228

Court : Kerala

the Government of Burma.” Sec. 60(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and ExplanationWA 297/20 - : 36 :-(1) thereunder provide as follows:“Sec.60. Property … the Board of Management is not at liberty to quantify damages allegedly suffered by the bank, especially when section 69 of the Co-operative Societies Act enables the bank to seek recovery of any damages from its employees by … under this Act and no gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company WA 297/20 - : 35 :- or shop exempted under section shall be liable to attachment

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory S. Nagara ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

the High Court with the enquiry. Therefore, the enquiry was entrusted to Inspector General of Registration - Registration Act, 1908. Ss.69 and 83.” 24. The learned Senior Counsel submits that on the similar set of facts when the … SCC 723. 27. Sri Parasaran cites the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Paradip Port Trust v. Sales Tax Officer and others, reported in (1998) 4 SCC 90, wherein it felt that if … by the third Respondent by virtue of residuary entry in terms of Section 4 (1) (B) of the KVAT Act, 2003, read with Entry 54,

Patel Mahendra Shankarlal, vs the District Collector,

Court : Kerala

that be so, necessary additional entries should be made in book No.1 as per Sec.89(5) of the Registration Act, 1908, so as to efface such attachment orders , which are not concerning the abovesaid property of the petitioner. … so, necessary additional entries should be made in book No.1 as per Sec.89(5) of the Registration Act, 1908, so as to efface such attachment orders … 10TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 6331 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: 1 PATEL MAHENDRA SHANKARLAL,AGED 69 YEARS S/O. SHANKERIAL PATEL, 34/A ANUPREETA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY, AZAD NAGAR, OFF … No.D-9 in the W.P.(C).6331/19 - : 3 :-apartment complex of Apple A Day Properties Ltd., near Nedumbarasseri Air Port and that apart from the ownership in the said flat, he is also having undivided shares in the

A-z (industrial) Premises Vs. Competent Authority, Iac

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1985)12ITD451(Mum.)

of transfer' was further defined in Clause (f) to mean the instrument of transfer registered under the Registration Act, 1908, or the statement registered under Section 269AB of the Act with the competent authority. Reading Clauses (f) and … for the various items involved had been taken as per the rates that were prevailing in the Bombay Port Trust in 1967, which have been taken into consideration. Further, the valuer has proceeded to measure the cubic