Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 67 · Page 1 of about 84 results (0.053 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1989

Mahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 67; Bombay Port Rules - Rules 4 and 19; Port Act, 1908 - Sections 6(1);

Reported in : AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)

have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 6(1)(k) of the Indian Ports Act 1908:6(1) The Government may, in addition to any rules which it may make under any other enactment for the … and the Port Trust authorities had adequate powers under the Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 and Section 67 of the Bombay Police Act to regulate the manner in which the launches carried passengers. 3. The only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1978

The Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Jayantilal L. Gandhi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-1978

Subject : CustomsLimitation

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61-A(2), 64, 64-A, 67, 67-A and 85; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30 - Schedule - Article 113; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1979Bom12; (1978)80BOMLR393; 1979MhLJ411

limitation.8. Mr. Daji, on the other hand, on behalf of the appellants, submitted that as under the Limitation Act, 1908, under Article 120 thereof, the limitation prescribes for such suits was six years, having regard to the provisions … the defendants, has contended that the suit is clearly barred by limitation having regard to the provisions of Section 67 of the Act. He urged that the present suit is filed to recover the balance of wharfage, demurrage … of limitation.2. It is the case of the appellants Trustees of the Port of Bombay that the consignment of 629 coil wire shorts arrived at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1996

M/S. Sardesai Transhippers Pvt. Ltd., and Etc. Vs. State of Goa and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-1996

Subject : Customs

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 38, 40, 43, 54, 64 and 67; Constitution of India - Article 165; Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1997Bom326

counsel for the petitioners, namely the validity of the imposition of wharfage under the provisions of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and the Rules made thereunder. Therefore, we venture to examine in this petition the legality or otherwise of … ports at the rates specified in the Schedule.' As mentioned in Rule 67, a Schedule also has been prescribed by the rule-making authority showing fees … to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Ports Act and the Rules and Notification made thereunder. Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, hereinafter called 'the Act' empowers the Government to extend the operation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2015

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2015

Subject : Arbitration

the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of S. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … Vs. The Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd., reported in 1971 (1) SCC 67 and in particular paragraph 1, 2, 7 to 11, 17 and 18 … unchallenged and which from their nature may reasonably be supposed to have affected the conduct of a large portion of the community in matters relating to rights of property: Young V. Robertson.” I have already said that … issued a Demand Notice upon the said M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act which notice was received by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2004

Shanthi Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorized Signatory, Mr. P. Rav ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-25-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 24, 53, 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 55, 110, 110(2), and 111; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; Import Manifest (Vessels) Regulations, 1971; Goods Imported (Conditions of Transhipment) Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 3 to 6

Reported in : 2004(176)ELT87(Mad); (2004)4MLJ46

report, as the case may be, as for transhipment-(a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908) or the customs airport at Mumbai, Calcutta, Delhi or Chennai, or any other customs port … imported 46 containers, and insofar as 39 containers are concerned the Customs Duty was assessed at Rs.11,85,174/- under Section 17 of the Customs Act and for other 7 containers the customs duty is still to be assessed.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1955

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Director of Rationing and Distribution

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-09-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 386 and 386(1); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 3(32); ;Constitution of India - Article 300; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Cal282,1955CriLJ792

the proviso to Section 20 goods belonging to Government were expressly exempted.Section 1(4) of the now repealed Indian Ports Act of 1889 exempted-from the operation of the. Act vessels belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty … belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty or the Government of India. Section 2(l) Indian Port Act, 1908, gave the same exemption to all vessels belonging to or in the service of His Majesty which in … the imposition of a charge on the revenues of India went, Section 67(2) required the previous sanction of the Governor General for the Indian Legislature

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … Board with the previous sanction of the Central Government to raise loans for the purposes of the Act. Section 67 further authorises the Board to issue port securities with the sanction of the Central Government. Section 81 provides

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2023

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2023

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … the engrossment of the decree on the stamp paper. …” (Emphasis supplied) 67. However, the said view must be understood in the context of the … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2017

M/S Rasiklal Kantilal and Co. Vs. Board of Trustee of Port of Bombay a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

unloading of imported goods and the loading of export goods etc. Indian Ports Acts, 1855, 1875, 1889 and 1908 regulated the activities of the ports in India. The Port Trust Acts of 1879, 1890 and 1905 of … passengers or goods, excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act. (2) Different scales and conditions may be framed for different classes of goods and vessels.” Section 48(1)(a) and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial