Advanced Search Results

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … a similar fate to Harris v. Earl of Chester filed [1911] A.C. 623 and Johnston v. O'Neill [1911] A.C. 552. The first of these cases

District Panchayat Vs. Vasantgauri Wife of Babulal Dave and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Sections 320, 320(2) and 320(3); Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 63; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120; Major Port Trusts Act, 1953 - Sections 120; Indore Municipal Act, 1909 - Sections 13, 13(2), 132 and 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : (2009)1GLR98

provided in any of the Articles under the Limitation Act, 1963. It is submitted that earlier in Limitation Act, 1908 where there was no limit provided vide Article 120 limit for the period 6 months was provided. In … of the plaintiff is not barred by limitation under Section 320 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 and Section 62 of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947?The respondent No. 1 expired during the pendency of the appeal, and … to refer to similarly cast provisions of Section 120 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1953 which read as under:120. Limitation of proceedings in respect

The Trustees of Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61A and 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974SC923; (1974)4SCC710; [1974]3SCR397

dismiss this suit, we feel that it is not enough that the State install police stations inside the ports; it must ensure diligent action by the officials, and if there is delinquency or default in discharging their … General. Sri Cooper contested the application of the principle in Bootamal on the score that Article 31, Limitation Act, 1908, which fell for construction there, used the words 'when the goods ought to be delivered' and covers both … summons. Earlier cases like Davis v. Curling 8 Q.B. 286(6) (1873) L.R. 62 were referred to and the conclusion reached that though the gravamen of … is only a short point of law in the case, a large section of the business community, as well as the Port Trust, are affected

The Principal Collector of Customs and the Union of India (Uoi) Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 61, 62 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14) - Order 8, Rules 5, 5(1) and 10 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR477; 2008(1)BomCR494; 2007(6)MhLj225

days, otherwise the same would be sold under the provisions of Sections 61 and 62 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 on 20th August, 1990. A letter was addressed by the respondent No.1 to the respondent … Judge purportedly exercising the powers under Order 8 Rule 5 and/or 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while disposing the suit.4. In the year 1988, the respondent No.1 sought to import from U.S. and Japan … 10 days, otherwise the same would be sold under the provisions of Sections 61 and 62 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 on 20th

Ali Mahomed Eid Vs. Fatima Mahomed Ebrahim

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyCivil

Reported in : AIR1919Bom37; (1919)21BOMLR713; 51Ind.Cas.968

wife to recover arrears of maintenance for her child is governed by Article 62 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908. - Section 31(4) (since repealed) :[Tarun Chatterjee & H.L.Dattu, JJ] Jurisdiction of High Court - Respondent, a Government … Togo to West Coast India - Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay - Application filed by respondent earlier

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only … detention is necessary and has not cancelled such certificate; (b) nothing in this section shall affect clause 3.50. Section 62(1)(b) makes it punishable with fine, which may extend to Rs.500/- for a person to execute or sign otherwise

G.C. Sharma Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 430; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 2

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi771b

of the act is such that it was not a continuing wrong. Secondly s. 23 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which speaks of 'continuing wrongs' has no application to Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, a special Act by virtue … what is not true. (Koti Reddi v. Subbian, Air 1918 Mad. (FB) 62. (12) Now, for example, the Public Authorities Protection Act of England, 1893, … to act in pursuance of the statute as are to be found in S. 142 of the Calcutta, Port Act (Be. Act Iii of 1890). The Calcutta Act of 1890 came for interpretation before the Judicial Committee … be instituted after the lapse of six months as specified in the section. It is quite clear that if the statute applies the suit is

Nav Bharat Corporation Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 61 and 62; Indian Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 5 and 12; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 55; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73, 191 and 192; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 6, Rule 14

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT72; 2006(2)MPLJ306

plaintiff/respondent. It is also admitted that the appellant was to unload the goods at Port Bombay and other ports like Kandla, Calcutta, Madras and Cochin also.3. The case of the plaintiff in substance is as under :As … the plaintiff. The defendant has further alleged that in violation of Sections 61-62 of the Major Port Trust Act the authorities without intimating to the defendant or/and the plaintiff sold few bundles by way of auction. Hence, … signature Civil - Jurisdiction - Section 20(c) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) - Whether present court has jurisdiction to deal with matter? - Held,

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat I Vs. Rajkot Seeds, Oil and Bullio ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1975]101ITR748(Guj)

interpretation of the words 'borrowed money' occurring under the taxation statutes in England. By the Port of London Act, 1908, the Port of London Authority acquired the property of the three leading dock companies of London. The consideration … property consisting of any building or lands appurtenant thereto of which he is the owner, other than such portions of such property as he may occupy for the purposes of any business, profession or vocation carried on … of 6 p. c. or any other rate on this amount under sections 9(1)(vi) and 24(1)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the Income-tax

S.K.S. Logistic Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Arbitral Tribunal shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. 27. The strict adherence of the … passed in O.P.No.153 of 1999. 2. The first respondent herein filed O.P.No.153 of 1999, praying to set aside portion of the Award, dated 18.11.1998 with respect to claim No.6 and Counter claim Nos. 2,4,5,6,7 and 8 and … the contract. The learned Single Judge traversed beyond the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interpreting the terms of the contract, which is impermissible in law and re-appreciating the evidence, by holding