Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 58 · Page 1 of about 119 results (0.296 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 1999

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … paragraphs, particularly 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 30, 44, 48, 49, 56, 58, 59, 65, 66, 67, 68, 72, 75, 78, 80, 83, 85, 88, … claim as and by way of damages for the estate of the deceased is under the provisions of section 2 (proviso) of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 and compensation for the loss of dependency under provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1961

Asit Ranjan Majumdar Vs. Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 126, 126(3) and 126(4); ;Calcutta Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1956; ;Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1961Cal365

that case what fell to be considered was the constitutionality of Sec. 15(2)(b) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act (1908), as amended in Madras by the Criminal Law Amendment (Madras) Act, 1950. By this law, as amended, the … Commissioners the power to acquire and hold immoveable or rnoveable properties and to deal with the same. Under Section 58 they can acquire land and buildings required for the purpose of the Act. Section 81 empoweresthe Commissioners to … inter alia as a stevedore, and is a member of the Calcutta Port Stevedores Association. He had in the past, worked as a stevedore while

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … payable to, the Commissioners, shall be held by the Commissioners in trust for the purposes of the Act. Section 58 provides for acquisition of land or building for the purpose of the Act through the instrumentality of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 2017

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … rate or of any charge leviable in special case, for the 14 reasons to be recorded in writing. Section 58 deals with time for payment of rates on goods. Section 59 of the Act provides that the Board

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … in ease, is a proper mode of seeking that remedy.29. At p. 58 he says:I asked the learned counsel for the defendants whether, if the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2006

Sushant T. Karwarkar Vs. Mormugao Port Trust and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 5A; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Major Port Trust Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR493; 2006(2)BomCR915; [2006(110)FLR905]

retirement benefits.7. Parliament then enacted what is known as the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997 (Act, for short) which gave powers to the Central Government to direct the provisions of the Dock … Act, 1948. Section 2(d) defines 'Major Port' to have the same meaning as in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.9. Section 4 of the Act deals with the transfer of assets and liabilities of the Dock Labour Board, … at premature age of 45/50 years as against the retirement age of 58 years, with all consequential retirement benefits.3. The case of the petitioner/s is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1974

The Trustees of Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-1974

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61A and 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974SC923; (1974)4SCC710; [1974]3SCR397

dismiss this suit, we feel that it is not enough that the State install police stations inside the ports; it must ensure diligent action by the officials, and if there is delinquency or default in discharging their … General. Sri Cooper contested the application of the principle in Bootamal on the score that Article 31, Limitation Act, 1908, which fell for construction there, used the words 'when the goods ought to be delivered' and covers both … making up the right to sue. In Annamalai Chettiar v. Muthukarappan Chattiar 58 I.A. 1, the Judicial Committee had observed In their Lordships' view the … is only a short point of law in the case, a large section of the business community, as well as the Port Trust, are affected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1932

Valliammal and ors. Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-11-1932

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1933Mad74; (1932)63MLJ810

of Civil I.L.R. (1929) 52 Mad. 717 : 57 M.L.J. 145. Procedure, 1908, and the Court may on his application enforce such acquisition or retention … in the Insolvency Act which entitles the Official Assignee to proceed with this application. It is argued that Section 58 of the Act does not give the Official Assignee this power because Section 58(2) says:The Official Assignee shall, … Q.B.D. 159 was considered by a Full Bench of the Rangoon High Court in D.J. Kolapore v. The Port Commissioners, Rangoon I.L.R. (1926) 4 Rang. 157. There the question to be considered was whether the provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial