Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 57 · Page 1 of about 114 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 2023

K.t.v. Health Food Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

port within the meaning of Major Ports Act, 1964. Another enactment, which deals with ports, is the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The appellants would contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it … contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it is licenced under Section 57 of the Customs Act as a customs station. In the Major Ports Act, the word ‘port’ is defined

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1974

The Trustees of Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-1974

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61A and 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974SC923; (1974)4SCC710; [1974]3SCR397

dismiss this suit, we feel that it is not enough that the State install police stations inside the ports; it must ensure diligent action by the officials, and if there is delinquency or default in discharging their … General. Sri Cooper contested the application of the principle in Bootamal on the score that Article 31, Limitation Act, 1908, which fell for construction there, used the words 'when the goods ought to be delivered' and covers both … against whom the suit is instituted' : Balo v. Koklan (1930) L.R. 57 l.A. 325. Counsel for the appellants admitted that he was unable to … is only a short point of law in the case, a large section of the business community, as well as the Port Trust, are affected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2004

Tapender Singh Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 4, 4A and 10; ;Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Section 3; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; ;Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; ;Motor Vehicles Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Constitution of India

Reported in : III(2004)ACC775,2005ACJ962

member of the crew, or handling or transport within the limits of any port subject to the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908), or the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (38 of 1963), of goods which have been … such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5-claimants filed proceedings under Section 4 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), against Satnam Singh, owner of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2014

Awaaz Foundation, Public Charitable Trust, Mumbai and Another Vs. Stat ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2014

Subject : Environment

coastal areas at 48 places in the State of Maharashtra with demarcation/identification of the limits under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, have been notified. Obviously, beyond the limits of the areas covered by the Indian Ports Act, the creeks, … 2006 to the National Green Tribunal alongwith the Civil Application filed therein. The Application falls within ambit of Section 14, 15 and 18 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and is accordingly entertained by this Tribunal.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1983

The Food Corporation of India Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Apr-20-1983

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1983)LC904DTri(Chennai)

per Rule 82( 1) of the New Mangalore Port Rules, 1976 issued under Section 5(2) of the Indian Ports Act, 1908; a certificate of port out-turn statement issued by them may be accepted as proof of landed quantity of … S.K. Choudhury, Senior Departmental Representative for the respondent, the Tribunal makes the following: 3. By his order No. 57/78-79 C. 3 dated 27.8.79, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Mangalore, rejected a claim for refund of duty on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … Government is empowered to cancel any such scales or make such modifications therein as it may think fit. Section 57 bars the Board from releasing rates without the prior sanction of the Central Government. Section 64 lays down

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1967

Engineering Construction Corporation, Ltd. Vs. Madras Port Trust, Madr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-1967

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 33

Reported in : AIR1968Mad335

of 1899 and the Second Schedule of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is sufficient if the brief reference is made to the provisions … decision in : AIR1952Cal226 and AIR 1957 Nag 57. This argument was rejected on the ground that … the umpire Dr. P.V. Rajamannar, retired Chief Justice, the second respondent herein. The first respondent is the Madras Port Trust. The award in question is filed by in the proceedings in O. P. No. 276 of 1965 … Construction Corporation, Limited, Bombay (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') under Sections 16, 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, Act 10 of 1940, for setting aside a award dated 30th October 1965, delivered by the umpire Dr. … the Engineering Construction Corporation, Limited, Bombay (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') under Sections 16, 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, Act 10 of 1940,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1962

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … goods after two months if rates or rents are not paid or lien for freight is not discharged. Section 57 provides for the publication of the notice for sale in the case of perishable goods in the custody

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … to have given the Comrs. that power by implication.'An implied power for the Justices to summarily convict under Section 57, Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1870 was recognised in Cullen v. Trimble, (1872) 7 Q. B. 416 : (41

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2015

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2015

Subject : Arbitration

the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of S. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … the person making the statement by an involved and far fetched reasoning. 57. In the facts of this case the letter dated 22.03.2001, by which … unchallenged and which from their nature may reasonably be supposed to have affected the conduct of a large portion of the community in matters relating to rights of property: Young V. Robertson.” I have already said that … issued a Demand Notice upon the said M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act which notice was received by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial