Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 56 · Page 1 of about 128 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 2017

M/s. Tungabadra Minerals Private Limited Vs. The Chennai Port Trust Re ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

implementation of the Government rules and in the interest of public, in exercise of the powers conferred Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Karnataka Ports (Landing and Shipping Fees) Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 20 of 1961), the Government hereby prohibits … Ghose V. Mugneeram Bangur and Co. It was held by this Court that the word impossible used in Section 56 of the Contract Act has not been used in the sense of physical or literal impossibility. It ought

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … the Board) challenging the right of the State Government to recover non-agricultural assessment in the sum of Rs. 56,06, 400/- for the revenue years 1963-64 to 1970-71 in respect of lands vesting in the Board by virtue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance.” In … Charges:3. A common charge of conspiracy was framed against all the co- conspirators including the appellants. The relevant portion of the said charge is reproduced hereunder: “During the period from December, 1992 to April, 1993 at various … Similarly, his report dated 21.04.1993, Exhibit No.2440-A also confirmed one Chinese Type 56-1 assault rifle and cartridges which were recovered from the said Maruti Van

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2023

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2023

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … in any Court when such instrument has been executed by or on 56 behalf of the Government, or where it bears the certificate of the … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1915

Karl Ettlinger Vs. Chagandas and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-1915

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1915Bom232; (1915)17BOMLR1087; 33Ind.Cas.205

in recent times, been modified and brought more closely into accord with the Indian law, as expressed in Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, would be a matter of long, difficult and delicate critical analysis. In this … with 1000 tons freight at 11s. 6d. per ton, the material to be carried being manganese from the Port of Bombay for Antwerp, shipment in September. On the 7th of September 1914, the defendants telegraphed to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2004

Smt. Sundra Bai and ors. Vs. Smt. Sonubai

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 29; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2004Kant336; ILR2004KAR1558; 2004(5)KarLJ619

the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No costs. CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 (CENTRAL ACT NO. 5 OF 1908) - ORDER 21 RULE 29 -- … port dues as a category of levy and will not include pilotage charges and berth hire charges. -- Section 56: Show cause notice regarding short levy bills - Notice issued indicating that it has approval of Board of … to be executed and unless an extraordinary case is made out, no stay should be granted. - MAJOR PORT TRUSTS ACT, 1963 [C.A. No. 38 OF 1963]. Sections 49-B, 50-A & 50-B: [A.S. Bopanna, J]Port dues Held,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1962

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … by the party entitled to such goods for the time during which they may be so retained. 20. Section 56 provides for the sale of goods after two months if rates or rents are not paid or lien

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2015

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2015

Subject : Arbitration

the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of S. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … the amount found due at the foot of the account on finalization. 56. In the said judgment Supreme Court has held that under section 19(1) … unchallenged and which from their nature may reasonably be supposed to have affected the conduct of a large portion of the community in matters relating to rights of property: Young V. Robertson.” I have already said that … issued a Demand Notice upon the said M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act which notice was received by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2023

K.t.v. Health Food Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

port within the meaning of Major Ports Act, 1964. Another enactment, which deals with ports, is the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The appellants would contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it … off than (used with distances). Adverb:1. inside; indoors. 2)internally or inwardly.” 40 56. Meaning of these words when compared, it will be clear that what … TO GOVERNMENT, UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. The Appeals are lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. C.A. No.3626 OF2020(THE FIRST APPEAL) 2. The appellant challenges the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1963

Kadethotada Gulappa Basappa Vs. Election Officer, Naregal Town Panchay ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-1963

Subject : Election

Acts : Mysore Village Panchayats and Local Boards Act, 1959; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33(4); Mysore Village Panchayats and Local Boards Rules - Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35-A

Reported in : AIR1965Kant62; AIR1965Mys62; ILR1964KAR165; (1964)1MysLJ355

port dues as a category of levy and will not include pilotage charges and berth hire charges. -- Section 56: Show cause notice regarding short levy bills - Notice issued indicating that it has approval of Board of … in Section 13(2) of the Act, cannot in our opinion include compensatory costs. Hence, we set aside that portion of the order of the Civil Judge awarding compensatory costs to the first respondent; subject to this, the … had been awarded in a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...............'(10) It appears to us that the powers of the Civil Court referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial