Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 53 · Page 1 of about 117 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 25 2004

Shanthi Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorized Signatory, Mr. P. Rav ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-25-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 24, 53, 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 55, 110, 110(2), and 111; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; Import Manifest (Vessels) Regulations, 1971; Goods Imported (Conditions of Transhipment) Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 3 to 6

Reported in : 2004(176)ELT87(Mad); (2004)4MLJ46

report, as the case may be, as for transhipment-(a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908) or the customs airport at Mumbai, Calcutta, Delhi or Chennai, or any other customs port … is further strengthened by Section 55 of the Act, which reads,'55. Liability of duty on goods transited under section 53 or transhipped under section 54.- Where any goods are allowed to be transited under section 53 or transhipped

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … As Sir Michael Westropp puts it in Baban Mayacha's case at p. 53 ' such aright could neither pass by livery, grant, descent or devise,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1945

Sadaksharappa Kabbur Vs. Karlingawa Karadi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-1945

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR1946Bom187; (1945)47BOMLR848

Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Order XXI, Rule 63.;In order that Article 182(5) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, may apply there must be three things ; (1) an application made in accordance with law; (2) the … it had been alienated to the person who objected in the earlier darkhast, the alienation being bad under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The decree-holder succeeded in this suit and thereafter filed the present … Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 2017

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … in relation to a port. Sub-section (1)(d) of Section 48 deals with wharfage, storage and demurrage of goods. Section 53 of the Act empowers the Board to exempt, either wholly or partially, any goods or vessels or class

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1995

Shree Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-1995

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT407TriDel

in the import manifest as for transhipment - (a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908), or the customs airport at Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi or Madras, or any other customs port … India or any customs port or customs airport may be allowed to be transitted without payment of duty. (Section 53) (d) Where imported goods are intended for transhipment, bill of transhipment shall be presented in the prescribed form.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1974

The Trustees of Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-1974

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61A and 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974SC923; (1974)4SCC710; [1974]3SCR397

dismiss this suit, we feel that it is not enough that the State install police stations inside the ports; it must ensure diligent action by the officials, and if there is delinquency or default in discharging their … General. Sri Cooper contested the application of the principle in Bootamal on the score that Article 31, Limitation Act, 1908, which fell for construction there, used the words 'when the goods ought to be delivered' and covers both … legal question. The first plaintiff became entitled to claim a consignment of 53 bundles of mild steel plates despatched by a Japanese exporter to be … is only a short point of law in the case, a large section of the business community, as well as the Port Trust, are affected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1947

Kotch Vs. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-31-1947

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Court. Louisiana statutes provide in general that all seagoing vessels moving between New Orleans and foreign ports must be navigated through the Mississippi River approaches to the port of New Orleans and within it, exclusively … Mississippi through the so-called "passes." La.Acts 1880, No. 99, § 2, La.Acts 1908, No. 55, § 1; La.Acts 1910, No. 26, § 1, 6 La.Gen. … Appellants here sought appointment as river port pilots. [ Footnote 2 ] Sections 2 and 3 of the Act of 1908 provided for the appointment … satisfactory, and made federal regulation unnecessary. 1 Stat. 53, 54 (1789), 46 U.S.C. § 211; Olsen v. … application of a precise formula. This Court has never attempted that impossible task. A law which affects the activities of some groups differently from the way in which it affects the activities of other groups is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2023

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2023

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … OF SECTION116A)?. .................................................................... 32 H. THE SCHEME OF THE STAMP ACT ................................................................................................. 53 I. HINDUSTAN STEEL LIMITED ANALYSED ........................................................................................ 59 J.THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2002

M.V. Asean Jade Vs. Jaisu Shipping Com. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 129; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957 - Rules 52 and 357; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR2000Guj241

These Rules are framed under Section 129 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with Clause 37 of the Letters Patent, These rules include rules … petitioned prayed for arrest of the ship 'Asean Jade' which was at the relevant time berthed at Kandla Port in the Kutch District in the State of Gujarat and further prayed that the Kandla Port Trust may … Management Pvt. Ltd. and that it is being with Glori Ship Management Pvt. Ltd. are the agents and acting as such which has been produced in the matter.5.2(A). The plaintiff further submitted that it is an undisputed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1918

The Municipal Council of Cocanada Vs. the clan Line Steamers, Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-1918

Subject : Direct TaxationCivil

Reported in : 51Ind.Cas.692

the world. It has not been contended before us that a shipowner exercises his trade at all the ports at which his steamers habitually call to discharge or load cargo, which latter operation may involve entering there … appeal is whether the Clan Line of Steamers, who have their registered office in Glasgow, are liable under Section 53 of the Madras District Municipalities Act, 1884, to pay profession tax in Cocanada on the ground that they

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial