Advanced Search Results

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … at Bombay became empowered to exercise its jurisdiction in respect of new State of Bombay by virtue of section 52 of the Act of 1956. Sections 49 and 52 which are relevant for the present purposes read thus:--49.

The Trustees of Port of Madras Vs. Good Year India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 110; Limitation Act. 1908 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 10(1) and 10(2)

Reported in : AIR1973Mad316; (1973)1MLJ296

on 1-7-1963. The contention of Sri Rajan is that for the purpose of Section 22 of the Limitation Act. 1908, which was in force then the Port Trust was made a party only on 1-7-1963 by which time … Reilly, JJ. in the South India Industrials Ltd. v. Mothey Narasimha Rao, 52 Mad LJ 199 = (AIR 1927 Mad 468). The facts were similar … 1. This appeal is by the Port Trust of Madras. The Good Year India Ltd. at Calcutta consigned to its branch office at Madras 614

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance.” In … Charges:3. A common charge of conspiracy was framed against all the co- conspirators including the appellants. The relevant portion of the said charge is reproduced hereunder: “During the period from December, 1992 to April, 1993 at various … the photograph of A-8; (ii) Pakistani photo identity card bearing not BQ 526267/509-69-270214 in the name of Mrs. Mehtab dated 29.03.1994 bearing the photo of

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 33, 34, 49 and 52; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the … increases were to be based on the assumption that land on which there were lessees was worth Rs. 521 crores. The trustees were to consider the Secretary's proposal in their meeting scheduled for August 9, 1982. At

In Re: the Bill to Amend S. 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and S. 3 o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 289 and 366; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20(1) and 20(2); Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1) and 3(1A)

Reported in : [1964]3SCR787

American Doctrine. The matter came to a head in two cases in 1908. In Kingv. Sutton (1908) 5 C.L.R. 786, a quantity of wire netting … the States; and (ii) Taxation, but so as not todiscriminate between the States or parts of States. 80. Section 52 defines the casesin which the power of the Commonwealth is to be exclusive. As regards theState, the board … community in a welfare State, theConstitution has made, as already indicated, specific provisions empoweringParliament to set aside a portion of its revenues, whether forming part of theConsolidated Fund of India or not, for the benefit of the … these terms : 'Whereas sub-section (1) ofsection 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 (Act 8 of 1878), provides for the levyof customs duties on

M.V. Asean Jade Vs. Jaisu Shipping Com. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 129; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957 - Rules 52 and 357; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR2000Guj241

These Rules are framed under Section 129 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with Clause 37 of the Letters Patent, These rules include rules … guarantee in consideration thereof.9. The defendant No. 3 applicant relied upon Rule 52 contained in Part III of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, … petitioned prayed for arrest of the ship 'Asean Jade' which was at the relevant time berthed at Kandla Port in the Kutch District in the State of Gujarat and further prayed that the Kandla Port Trust may … Management Pvt. Ltd. and that it is being with Glori Ship Management Pvt. Ltd. are the agents and acting as such which has been produced in the matter.5.2(A). The plaintiff further submitted that it is an undisputed

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … the plea, continue with the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award. 52 (6) A party aggrieved by such an arbitral award may make an … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … to frame a scale of rates at which services shall be rendered at the port or port approaches. Section 52 provides that every scale of rates and every settlement of conditions framed by a Board shall be submitted

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … for the rent due to the Board on any buildings etc., in which those goods had been placed. Section 52 provides for the priority of this lien of the Board over certain other liens and claims. Section 53

Luga Bay Shipping Corporation and Another Vs. Board of Trustees of the ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 42, 48, 49, 50, 52, 65, 116, 123 and 131; Constitution of India; Harbours Docks and Piers Clauses Act - Sections 74; Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 29(1)

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)74; AIR1997SC544; JT1996(10)SC687; 1996(8)SCALE505; (1997)1SCC631; [1996]Supp9SCR103

under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Major Port Trusts Act') the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Indian Ports Act') and the Regulations made thereunder, to demand an unconditional cash … and 50 of the Major Port Trusts Act empower every Board to frame certain scales of rates and Section 52 of the Act provides that the date so fixed will have effect only when sanction in this behalf