Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 51 · Page 1 of about 146 results (0.055 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 1962

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … be shipped for export, or transhipped, shall be payable before the goods are removed or shipped or transhipped. Section 51 gives the Board a lien on the goods for the amount of the rates leviable under the Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1997

Lee Young Sang and anr. Vs. the Board of Trustees for Port of Calcutta ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-08-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 51 and 94 - Order 38, Rule 1; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Section 478; ;Indian Ports Act - Sections 6 and 14; ;Ship Breaking Rules - Rules 135 and 140

Reported in : (1997)2CALLT359(HC)

It is not directly concerned with negligence but is concerned with salvage. Under Section 14 of the Indian Ports Act, the Conservator of a port is entitled to serve a notice upon the owner of a sunken ship … gave us the case of Jolly George reported at : [1980]2SCR913 . The court was there concerned with Section 51 proviso (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. That deals with arrest for inability to satisfy a money

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … adopted in American decisions like Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, Thomas v. Collins, 323 U. S. 516, & West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 in order to invalidate the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1995

Chowgule and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1995

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1995)(80)ELT680TriDel

any other vessel carrying cargo. The appellants pay dues such as pilotage charges, port dues, under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, and charges which are only payable by vessels such as berth hire and anchorage charges under the Major … amended to 33,400 DWT capacity, built in 1974) from Japan. (iii) After import, the vessel was registered under Section 34 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (part V) & a certificate of Indian Registry No. 2194, dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2023

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2023

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … law. He further drew support from the following Judgments:8. (1969) 1 SCC5979 51 Indian Appeals 332 18 i. Joyman Bewa v. Easin Sarkar10; ii. Gulzari … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2025

Jsw Steel Ltd. versus the Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Trust M ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.701

amount deposited in the court by the appellant and disposed of the writ petition as being infructuous. Headnotes† Ports Act, 1908 - s.14 - Raising or removal of wreck impeding navigation within limits of port - Appellant called upon … Notice/Communication dated 19.04.1995 issued by the then Deputy Conservator of respondent no.1, which specifically states that power under Section 14(1) 1 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 2 was being exercised and the appellant (in its then

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1967

Engineering Construction Corporation, Ltd. Vs. Madras Port Trust, Madr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-1967

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 33

Reported in : AIR1968Mad335

of 1899 and the Second Schedule of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is sufficient if the brief reference is made to the provisions … the umpire Dr. P.V. Rajamannar, retired Chief Justice, the second respondent herein. The first respondent is the Madras Port Trust. The award in question is filed by in the proceedings in O. P. No. 276 of 1965 … Construction Corporation, Limited, Bombay (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') under Sections 16, 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, Act 10 of 1940, for setting aside a award dated 30th October 1965, delivered by the umpire Dr. … the Engineering Construction Corporation, Limited, Bombay (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') under Sections 16, 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, Act 10 of 1940, … of this chapter.Under the Code of 1882, Section 516 provided that in case of arbitrations through Court,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1992

Union of India Vs. K. Siraj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-21-1992

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(19), 11, 11(2), 28, 47, 51, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106A, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 125, 129D, 130, 132, 133, 134, 135 and 135A

Reported in : 1993(44)ECC262; 1993(65)ELT25(Mad)

that the exemption under Section 132 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall be applicable to any requisition for attendance under … of the same, the proper officer may make an order permitting clearance of the goods for home consumption.' Section 51 reads as follows : 'Where the proper officer is satisfied that any goods entered for export are not … personal bond for the balance of redemption fine and the total of personal penalty. The petitioner-respondent shifted the Port from Madras Air Port to Trivandrum Air Port in June, 1991 and instead of in the name of … Court has found a summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act to the petitioner-respondent invalid. The Union of India, the Collector of Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1996

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Government of Peoples Repu ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-30-1996

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 20 and 38; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 443

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT971; 1997(40)DRJ441

laws in force other than the Merchant Shipping Act.'; [pr 22] Section 443 and Code of Civil Procedure 1908, section 20-High Court of Delhi (Original Side) seized of a suit has jurisdiction to make order for attachment by … appear to the Court to be just and convenient if it is so prescribed. Even if not prescribed, Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code saves inherent power of the court to make such orders as may be … 6500 Mt on a ship known as M V Yanmit from Kakinada Port. at Andhra Pradesh for Chittagong Port in Bangladesh. The ship belonged to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 43 - No duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, or fees under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. 51 (2011) 6 SCC71434 be regarded as trade or business. Reliance was placed upon State of Karnataka v. … may by the said name sue and be sued.” 66 Section 20 of the GMB Act 39 minor ports in the State of Gujarat, and for all matters connected therewith. The Board’s powers under the GMB Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial