Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 45 · Page 1 of about 200 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 1991

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Calcutta Vs. the Lowland Tanker C ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-09-1991

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Major Port Trust Act;; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 31 and 31(2);; Calcutta Port Rules - Rules 5 and 45;; The Marchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 352 and 352B;; The Marchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970;; International Collision Rules - Rules 22, 23, 24, 25 and 28

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT364(HC)

however, been contended on behalf of the appellant that under sub-section (2) of section 31 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, the negligence of a pilot or Harbour Master or Assistant Harbour Master placed on board a vessel under … as to keep free the navigable channel required by the Tanker and thus failed to comply with Rule 45 of the Port Rule; (f) They failed to keep the Tug an overtaking vessel out of the way

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … High Court gravely erred in holding that the Port Trust is the custodian of the Customs Department under Section 45(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. In the alternative, he submitted, that even if the Port Trust is held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1962

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … nextquarter will becalculated as idle time.For example, if there iscontinuous stoppage for35 minutes, the idletime will be calculatedas 45 minutes.2. Port Trust Mazdoors sent away Rs. 5 per mazdoor per shiftor not required after shore or part

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 02 1999

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … the 1st defendant vessel to be condemned in the sum of Rs. 45 lacs along with interest at the rate of 18%f per annum and … claim as and by way of damages for the estate of the deceased is under the provisions of section 2 (proviso) of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 and compensation for the loss of dependency under provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1963

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. General Trading Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-19-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74E and 80; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 142; ;Limitation Act - Section 15(2); ;Sale of Goods Act - Section 23; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 103 and 178; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 137; ;Bills of Lading Act, 1856; ;English Bills of Lading Act, 1855

Reported in : AIR1964Cal290,68CWN410

of the English Factors Act of 1889 (52 and 53 Vict. c. 45) which was adopted by Section 62 of the English Sale of Goods … General Trading Corporation, hereinafter called the plaintiff company, against the Union of India and the Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta. The present appeal is by the defendant No. 2, viz., the Commissioners for the Port of … this suit. The defendant Port Commissioners have also taken the plea that the plaintiff has no cause of action and also that the suit is barred by limitation by virtue of the provisions of the Calcutta Port … said landing?13. Is No. 1 Garden Reach Jetty a warehouse licensed under Section 16 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 ?14. Did the goods at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1989

Mahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 67; Bombay Port Rules - Rules 4 and 19; Port Act, 1908 - Sections 6(1);

Reported in : AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)

have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 6(1)(k) of the Indian Ports Act 1908:6(1) The Government may, in addition to any rules which it may make under any other enactment for the … R.S. Pathak, C.J.I.1. These appeals are directed against an order of the Bombay High 45 Court dismissing in limine the appeals filed by the appellants herein against the judgment of a Single Judge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Container Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Inco ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act. However, a “port”, which also qualifies for the deduction is defined in Section 3(4) of the Indian Ports Act, 1908(Act 15 of 1908) to include “also any part of a river or channel” in which the said … (PCTs) which are spread all over the country. It would appear that the assessee has a total of 45 ICDs. 3. Before we proceed further, it would be useful to appreciate the nature of the business activity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2013

Salitho Ores Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. the CaptaIn of Ports CaptaIn of P ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : May-08-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Salitho Ores Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. the CaptaIn of Ports CaptaIn of Ports Department and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2006

Sushant T. Karwarkar Vs. Mormugao Port Trust and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 5A; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Major Port Trust Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR493; 2006(2)BomCR915; [2006(110)FLR905]

retirement benefits.7. Parliament then enacted what is known as the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997 (Act, for short) which gave powers to the Central Government to direct the provisions of the Dock … Act, 1948. Section 2(d) defines 'Major Port' to have the same meaning as in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.9. Section 4 of the Act deals with the transfer of assets and liabilities of the Dock Labour Board, … removed from the services of the Board, on attaining the age of 45/50 years (to keep the Board alive on account of surplus labour force

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1990

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1990

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 33, 34, 49 and 52; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the … 886.681980 979.321981 1,019.021982 13,398.103) Janata Iron & Trading Co. - W.P. No. 90/83.1960 100.281969 173.201972 219.001976 341.011977 395.761978 450.511979 505.251980 560.011981 614.761982 2,111.364) Indian Cable Co. Ltd. - W.P. No. 984/83.1960 604.431968 805.911972 1,007.391976 1,511.091977 1,762.931978 2,014.781979

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial