Advanced Search Results

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCivil

Acts : Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(6); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi289; 1994LC679(Delhi); 1992(58)ELT374(Del)

calling at Paradip Port have been changed from 'Net Register Tonnage (for short 'N.R.T.') as stipulated under Indian Ports Act 1908 (for short the 'Act') to 'Gross Register Tonnage (for short 'G.R.T.'). According to the petitioners, the change so … by Government, and it is in the following terms : 'THEGovernment may after consulting the authority appointed under Section 36 exempt, subject to such conditions, if any, as it thinks fit to impose, any vessel or class of

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Asit Ranjan Majumd ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1); ;Calcutta Ports Act, 1889 - Sections 5 and 126(3); ;Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1962Cal530

a citizen. The area of the Calcutta Port is defined by notification under Section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and under Section 6 of which the Government has power to make Port Rules for various purposes mentioned … Port Commissioners can borrow money only under an order of the Central Government so directing (Section 18). Under Section 36 of the Act, Government may order local survey and examination of any works of the Commissioners under the

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through … the new act.? Referred Port Small Corporation Vs. Smith 1985 (10) SC 364 was relied by the Apex Court and quoted in the judgment of

Muthukrishnan Vs. 1. the Union of India,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

10 (2), no person shall import or export explosives except in accordance with license and only through notified ports by the Central Government. As per Rule 10(4), no person shall deliver or despatch explosives without license. Hence … 9(B)(1)(a), 9(B)(1)(b), Explosive Act r/w 10(2) Explosive Rules 2008 and Section 4(b) 5 and 6 of Explosive Substances Act 1908 was filed by the police authorities.13. Mr.K.Chellapandian, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State would submit that … departments, fireworks in India is declared as ".restricted items". under ITC (HS) 36.04.10 by DGFT. PESO has not granted any license for import of fire

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Major Port Trusts Act - Sections 111, 42(3); Indian Ports Act; Electricity Act - Sections 178, 79(1)(j)

discrimination. This condition shall be applicable only within the port limits of the Licensor as notified under Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Major Port Trusts Act, 1963."29. Ms. Chidambaram submitted that it would, therefore, be evident from the above … in the Transferred cases was whether a contractual right could be superseded by a general policy decision under Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, without any legislation. In other words, in the facts of

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … dated 30th December, 1991 on the ground that the same was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 120 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and that the suit

Mr. Allan S.F. Falerio Vs. State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilRight to information

Acts : Right of Information Act; Indian Port Act, 1908 - Sections 30; Inland Vessels Act - Sections 20(4); Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 75, 76 and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; STCW Code - Sections A-1/11; Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers) Rules, 1998 - Rule 10 and 10(2); Recruitment Rules, 1973; Merchant Shipping (Medical Examination) Rules, 1986

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR7

Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a writ of Quo Warranto against Respondent No. 2, the Captain of Ports, who has been appointed by Respondent No. 1, Government of Goa, upon the recommendations of the Goa Public … has stated that the Petitioner had applied for grant of N.O.C./permission under Section 30 of the Indian Port Act, 1908 for setting up a SSI Unit for steel fabrication/repair of vessels at the bank of river Zuari at … has further stated that between 30-4-2007 to 10-7-2009 the Petitioner filed about 36 applications for seeking information and in most of the cases the information

G.C. Nagaraju Vs. the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Mysore Division, Mys ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3- Schedule - Articles 18 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80, Order 41, Rule 27; Madras Port Trust Act - Sections 110; Constitution of India - Article 136, 141; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 115, 120; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5033; 2001(1)KarLJ71

v Sirajuddin) in similar set of circumstances held that word 'compensation' used in Article 115 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has the same meaning as it has under Section 73 of the Contract Act and that, where the … to be answered in the negative and in favour of the appellant. 36. It is to be noted here that the learned Civil Judge had … defeat just claim of citizen came to be deprecated by the Supreme Court in a decision in Madras Port Trust v Hymanshu International by its Proprietor V. Venkatadri (dead) by L.Rs. 15. While taking me through the

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

Senior Counsel points out that Section 133 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 has repealed the Indian Ports Act, 1908 as also the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 and, therefore, the regulations thereunder must be deemed to have

Pacific BasIn Handymax (Uk) Ltd. Vs. Ashapura Minechem Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

agreed to load minimum of 6 shipments annually of 45,000 MTS to 50,000 MTS of Bauxite from various ports in Gujarat to be carried on board the petitioner's vessels for discharging at various ports in China. Clause … direction under Order 39 rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 striking off the respondent's defence in Arbitration Petition No.24 of 2010 and … in view of the pendency of application filed by the respondents under section 34 and by virtue of section 36 of the Act, the said award became unexecutable and until the said application filed under section 34 by