Advanced Search Results

South India Shipping Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Board of Trustees for th ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 65 and 116;; The Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 31(1) and (2)

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT531(HC)

at the centre. It was submitted on behalf of the defendant, that under section 31(2) of (The) Indian Ports Act, 1908 the plaintiff was liable to pay the repairing costs of the coal-loader which had been damaged, despite the

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Calcutta Vs. the Lowland Tanker C ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Major Port Trust Act;; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 31 and 31(2);; Calcutta Port Rules - Rules 5 and 45;; The Marchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 352 and 352B;; The Marchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970;; International Collision Rules - Rules 22, 23, 24, 25 and 28

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT364(HC)

however, been contended on behalf of the appellant that under sub-section (2) of section 31 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, the negligence of a pilot or Harbour Master or Assistant Harbour Master placed on board a vessel under

Delta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 6, 31, 32, 33, 35, 46, 47 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Goa Barge Tax Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 220; Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 54, 55, 64

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110

(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … leads to a port and in which this Act is not in force;(b) specially extend the provisions of Section 31 or Section 32 to any port to which they have not been so extended;(c) withdraw this Act or

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 95(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(3), 19(1), 19(6) and 367; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Sea Customs Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

Board the power to make by-laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act or of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, inter alia 'for the reception, porterage, storage and removal of goods brought within the premises of the Board … tie Harbour of Madras shall vest in the Board, subject to all charges and liabilities affecting the same (Section 31). Schedule II comprises what may be called compendiously 'the Madras Harbour', including land; buildings, structures and appliances thereon,

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Major Ports Trust Act; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 46 and 50; Business of the Government of Pondicherry Rules, 1963 - Rule 5 and 5(2); Indian Major Ports Act, 1908; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(9); Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Pondicherry Administration Regulations Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 - Regulations 2 and 6; Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 - Sections 4; Environment Protection Act; General Financial Rules, 1963; Supreme Court Orders, 1960 - Order 16; Supreme Court Rules, 1960 - Rule 4(1); Delegation of Financial Rules - Rule 21; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 239, 239A and 240

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225

ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … of Ports to extend the time to submit the report till December 31, 2003. In response thereof, the Director of Port, by his letter dated … personal selection, is rejected.22.The contention that a conjoint reading of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution and Sections 46, 50 of the Government of Union Territories Act read with Rule 5 of the Rules of Business

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of S. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … unchallenged and which from their nature may reasonably be supposed to have affected the conduct of a large portion of the community in matters relating to rights of property: Young V. Robertson.” I have already said that … issued a Demand Notice upon the said M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act which notice was received by the … the said plant in their Income Tax Returns for the year ending 31.3.1995 for the assessment year 1995-1996. On 31.3.1998, the Deputy Commissioner of Income

Patit Paban Bose Vs. the Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 311(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 31(1); ;Civil Service (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55

Reported in : AIR1957Cal720

be binding on anyone, including themselves. 14. Section 31 was amended in 1951 by the Port Trusts and Ports (Amendment) Act by which all the three Acts, relating to the Ports of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras, were … that, if even they did so. Government had confirmed the Rules, so adopted, in toto as required by Section 31(3) of the Calcutta Port Act (III of 18901. The proposal to adopt the Fundamental Rules appears to have

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

may by the said name sue and be sued.” 66 Section 20 of the GMB Act 39 minor ports in the State of Gujarat, and for all matters connected therewith. The Board’s powers under the GMB Act … • Section 43 - No duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, or fees under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. 51 (2011) 6 SCC71434 be regarded as trade or business. Reliance was placed upon State of Karnataka v. … SCCOnline Bom 10021 (para 10-12) 34 (1965) 1 SCR909(hereafter “Navnit Lal Jhaveri”) 31 executive’s understanding - in the form of circulars in the context of

Ma Hnit Vs. Fatima Bibi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR863

to the simple question whether the appeal is so late as to be barred by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (IX of 1908). For the appellant it was argued by Mr. Raikes that the suit in which the … sale decreed by a competent Court, and the price paid by him had been applied to repay a portion of the money advanced by the appellant to the respondents on security of the property mortgaged. It therefore … was passed setting aside the mortgage.;Decree of the High Court reversed. - Section 31(4) (since repealed) :[Tarun Chatterjee & H.L.Dattu, JJ] Jurisdiction of High Court

Rama Shah Vs. Lal Chand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationContract

Reported in : (1940)42BOMLR640

endorsement states.4. The proviso at the end of the first Sub-section of Section 20 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, was the subject of amendment made by Act I of 1927, and the amended Sub-section, stands as follows:20(1) … the unamended Section -see Gopi Nath Singh v. Hardeo Singh 1909 I.L.R. 31 All. 285 and Cham v. Karam Bux (1917) 27 C. L.J. 141. … Togo to West Coast India - Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay - Application filed by respondent earlier