Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 30 · Page 1 of about 390 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 1978

The Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Jayantilal L. Gandhi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-1978

Subject : CustomsLimitation

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61-A(2), 64, 64-A, 67, 67-A and 85; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30 - Schedule - Article 113; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1979Bom12; (1978)80BOMLR393; 1979MhLJ411

limitation.8. Mr. Daji, on the other hand, on behalf of the appellants, submitted that as under the Limitation Act, 1908, under Article 120 thereof, the limitation prescribes for such suits was six years, having regard to the provisions … Article 120 thereof, the limitation prescribes for such suits was six years, having regard to the provisions of Section 30 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the claim for wharfage and demurrage charges for the period March 21, 1962 … of limitation.2. It is the case of the appellants Trustees of the Port of Bombay that the consignment of 629 coil wire shorts arrived at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

in the interest of all having the like right and may be subject to statutory restrictions, such as Section 30 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 Accordingly in general the right will prevail against the owner of the … as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2009

Mr. Allan S.F. Falerio Vs. State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-27-2009

Subject : CivilRight to information

Acts : Right of Information Act; Indian Port Act, 1908 - Sections 30; Inland Vessels Act - Sections 20(4); Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 75, 76 and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; STCW Code - Sections A-1/11; Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers) Rules, 1998 - Rule 10 and 10(2); Recruitment Rules, 1973; Merchant Shipping (Medical Examination) Rules, 1986

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR7

has stated that the Petitioner had applied for grant of N.O.C./permission under Section 30 of the Indian Port Act, 1908 for setting up a SSI Unit for steel fabrication/repair of vessels at the bank of river Zuari at … Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a writ of Quo Warranto against Respondent No. 2, the Captain of Ports, who has been appointed by Respondent No. 1, Government of Goa, upon the recommendations of the Goa Public

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 1984

Pratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-1984

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Guj68

limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … any suit in a civil court. Section 25 enjoins that the Board is not to be the court. Section 30 enacts a scheme of general savings and mentions 7 cases in which provisions of the Act would not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1961

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Asit Ranjan Majumd ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-02-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1); ;Calcutta Ports Act, 1889 - Sections 5 and 126(3); ;Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1962Cal530

a citizen. The area of the Calcutta Port is defined by notification under Section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and under Section 6 of which the Government has power to make Port Rules for various purposes mentioned … as a sovereign function of the State. The Legislative items in List I such as Items 27, 28, 30 and 41 indicate the all India importance of Ports and the Port area. The House of Lords in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1999

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … of Bombay shall become the High Court for the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Gujarat, under section 30 of the said Act was conferred jurisdiction in respect of the territories included in the State of Gujarat

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Miscellaneous

the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in terms of Section 10 of the said Act the Conservator can cause obstruction to be removed within the limits of port … and cross-objection, both, are directed against the Judgment, Order and Decree dated 30/07/2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasco-da-Gama (trial Court) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2011

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2011

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Major Port Trusts Act - Sections 111, 42(3); Indian Ports Act; Electricity Act - Sections 178, 79(1)(j)

discrimination. This condition shall be applicable only within the port limits of the Licensor as notified under Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Major Port Trusts Act, 1963."29. Ms. Chidambaram submitted that it would, therefore, be evident from the above … Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) Basis on licence for a period of 30 years. Since 1996, it has been the policy of the Central Government … in the Transferred cases was whether a contractual right could be superseded by a general policy decision under Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, without any legislation. In other words, in the facts of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1969

Radheshaym Mohanlal Kaitan Vs. the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Nagpur ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1969

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 - Sections 21, 22, 23, 24, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 37, 91, 120 and 129; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145, 146 and 417(3); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(2), 15, 16, 17, 18, 22 and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1970Bom138; (1970)72BOMLR326; ILR1970Bom867; 1969MhLJ689

He further held that the tenant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908 and that the pendency of proceedings under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Codewas not a bar to making an … Section 4, Sections 9 to 18 and Section 22 must be held to apply to an application under Section 30 (1) of the Tenancy Act, 1958 in so far as and to the extent to which they are … Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2009

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-14-2009

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Major Ports Trust Act; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 46 and 50; Business of the Government of Pondicherry Rules, 1963 - Rule 5 and 5(2); Indian Major Ports Act, 1908; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(9); Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Pondicherry Administration Regulations Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 - Regulations 2 and 6; Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 - Sections 4; Environment Protection Act; General Financial Rules, 1963; Supreme Court Orders, 1960 - Order 16; Supreme Court Rules, 1960 - Rule 4(1); Delegation of Financial Rules - Rule 21; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 239, 239A and 240

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225

ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … Pondicherry Port for handing over to the respondent No. 11 by January 30, 2006, consequent upon the decision taken by the Government of Pondicherry for … personal selection, is rejected.22.The contention that a conjoint reading of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution and Sections 46, 50 of the Government of Union Territories Act read with Rule 5 of the Rules of Business

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial