Advanced Search Results
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-14-2009
CivilCommercial
Major Ports Trust Act; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 46 and 50; Business of the Government of Pondicherry Rules, 1963 - Rule 5 and 5(2); Indian Major Ports Act, 1908; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(9); Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Pondicherry Administration Regulations Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 - Regulations 2 and 6; Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 - Sections 4; Environment Protection Act; General Financial Rules, 1963; Supreme Court Orders, 1960 - Order 16; Supreme Court Rules, 1960 - Rule 4(1); Delegation of Financial Rules - Rule 21; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 239, 239A and 240
JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225
ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … Pondicherry has complete jurisdiction in relation to Pondicherry Port, which is a minor port. The reliance placed upon Section 3(9) of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 read with Section 6(b) of the Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 is totally
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGreat Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
May-25-1989
CustomsCivil
Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(6); Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1989Delhi289; 1994LC679(Delhi); 1992(58)ELT374(Del)
calling at Paradip Port have been changed from 'Net Register Tonnage (for short 'N.R.T.') as stipulated under Indian Ports Act 1908 (for short the 'Act') to 'Gross Register Tonnage (for short 'G.R.T.'). According to the petitioners, the change so … read with first schedule thereof, port dues are to be levied 'per ton' which expression is defined under Section 3(6) of the Act to mean a ton as determined or determinable by the rules for the time being
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Sep-20-1967
ContractLimitation
Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39, 39(1), 40, 41, 41A, 104, 110 and 111; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 102; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(2) and 3(22); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92, 130A and 135A; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120
AIR1970Mad48
in Singapore Harbour by the Singapore Harbour Board which under the Singapore Ports Ordinance was authorised to carry on the business of wharfingers and warehousemen … did not at all include suits by the insurer-subrogee within its scope. Article 120 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, the residual article, would apply, and these suits would be perfectly within time.6. But, on deeper scrutiny, I … seal and shall sue and be sued in the name of the Trustees of the Port of Madras. Section 3 (22) of the Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 defines the word 'person' so as to include any company
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sylvester and Co. Vs. their workman thro' Transport and Dock Workers' ...
Mumbai
Jun-13-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 25F and 33; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3; Mines Act, 1952; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; Dock Workers Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air India Employees' Service Regulations - Regulation 48
2008(3)BomCR395; (2008)ILLJ546Bom
Section 2 to mean a major port as defined in Clause 8 of Section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The expression 'major port' is defined by the Indian Ports Act, 1908 to mean any port which the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others
Mumbai
Dec-02-1999
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)
AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556
Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … the said High Court.'9. In the year 1890, Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 was enacted. Section 2(1), section 3 and section 7 of the said Act read thus:--'2. Colonial courts of Admiralty.---(1) Every Court of law in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-21-2007
Civil
Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75
2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875
in several statutes including Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Indian Ports Act, 1908, as also the Dictionary meaning cited in the judgment of this Court pronounced in the case of m.v.SAABA … to hold/arrest any property. He has invited my attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act … attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Sep-14-1950
Constitution
Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950
AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628
Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-2009
Civil
Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 6, 31, 32, 33, 35, 46, 47 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Goa Barge Tax Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 220; Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 54, 55, 64
2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110
(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also any part of a river or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...
Chennai
Nov-13-1998
Commercial
Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908
1998(3)CTC318
Senior Counsel points out that Section 133 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 has repealed the Indian Ports Act, 1908 as also the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 and, therefore, the regulations thereunder must be deemed to have … Jawahar Docks in Chennai Port. These six berths are for handling deep drafted vessels with a draft of 33 feet and a beam of 105 feet. In short, bigger vessels which carry large quantities of cargo can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanthi Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorized Signatory, Mr. P. Rav ...
Chennai
May-25-2004
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 24, 53, 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 55, 110, 110(2), and 111; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; Import Manifest (Vessels) Regulations, 1971; Goods Imported (Conditions of Transhipment) Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 3 to 6
2004(176)ELT87(Mad); (2004)4MLJ46
report, as the case may be, as for transhipment-(a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908) or the customs airport at Mumbai, Calcutta, Delhi or Chennai, or any other customs port … imported 46 containers, and insofar as 39 containers are concerned the Customs Duty was assessed at Rs.11,85,174/- under Section 17 of the Customs Act and for other 7 containers the customs duty is still to be assessed. … appropriate customs duty. The appellant had imported 46 containers, and insofar as 39 containers are concerned the Customs Duty was assessed at Rs.11,85,174/- under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »