Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 27 · Page 1 of about 338 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 09 2000

G.C. Nagaraju Vs. the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Mysore Division, Mys ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-09-2000

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3- Schedule - Articles 18 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80, Order 41, Rule 27; Madras Port Trust Act - Sections 110; Constitution of India - Article 136, 141; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 115, 120; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5033; 2001(1)KarLJ71

v Sirajuddin) in similar set of circumstances held that word 'compensation' used in Article 115 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has the same meaning as it has under Section 73 of the Contract Act and that, where the … their side in the instant appeal as contemplated under Order 41, Rule 27 of the CPC. He further prayed that the said application be allowed … defeat just claim of citizen came to be deprecated by the Supreme Court in a decision in Madras Port Trust v Hymanshu International by its Proprietor V. Venkatadri (dead) by L.Rs. 15. While taking me through the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … payment of monthly salary but every such appointment is made subject to the sanction of the Central Government. Section 27 further provides that notwithstanding anything contained in Section 23, no post other than a post referred to in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2014

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Apr-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … do something. Again as per the Law Lexicon [Page 3930] vide page 27 of the present submissions, licence is a power or authority to do … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2007

New Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875

in several statutes including Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Indian Ports Act, 1908, as also the Dictionary meaning cited in the judgment of this Court pronounced in the case of m.v.SAABA … relies on various documents to establish transfer of 'title' in the 'property'. 27. On the other hand Mr.Sen learned Counsel appearing for plaintiffs submits that … to hold/arrest any property. He has invited my attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2007

Research Foundation for Science Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2007

Subject : Environment

Acts : HW Rules, 2003 - Rule 5; Gujarat Maritime Board (Prevention of Fire and Accidents for Safety and Welfare of Workers and Protection of Environment during Ship breaking Activities) Regulations, 2000

Reported in : AIR2007SC3118; JT2007(10)SC635; 2007(10)SCALE594; (2007)8SCC583; 2007(2)LC1080(SC)

comes into play, the recommendations shall be operative by virtue of this order - Petition disposed of - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … shall be operative by virtue of this order - Petition disposed of - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and adequacy, of facilities at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1961

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Asit Ranjan Majumd ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-02-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1); ;Calcutta Ports Act, 1889 - Sections 5 and 126(3); ;Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1962Cal530

a citizen. The area of the Calcutta Port is defined by notification under Section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and under Section 6 of which the Government has power to make Port Rules for various purposes mentioned … judicial decisions as a sovereign function of the State. The Legislative items in List I such as Items 27, 28, 30 and 41 indicate the all India importance of Ports and the Port area. The House of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2014

New Mangalore Port List.Workers Man.Com. Vs. Reg.Dir.,esi Corp.,bangal ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-28-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the learned counsel for the appearing parties and perused the materials on record.8. In terms of Indian Ports Act 1908, “Major Port” means any port which the Central Government may by notification in the official gazette declare, or … falling for consideration in this appeal.3. Brief facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as follows:- Section 1(5) of the ESI Act enables the appropriate government to issue notification in respect of any other establishment … New Mangalore Port was declared as a Major Port. By notification dated 27.3.1980, the provisions of Major Port Trusts Act 1963 were made applicable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1955

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Director of Rationing and Distribution

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-09-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 386 and 386(1); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 3(32); ;Constitution of India - Article 300; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Cal282,1955CriLJ792

the proviso to Section 20 goods belonging to Government were expressly exempted.Section 1(4) of the now repealed Indian Ports Act of 1889 exempted-from the operation of the. Act vessels belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty … belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty or the Government of India. Section 2(l) Indian Port Act, 1908, gave the same exemption to all vessels belonging to or in the service of His Majesty which in … pointed out that under Section 17, Inventions and Designs Act, 1888, sincerepealed which is substantially a reproduction of Section 27, English Patents Act of 1883, the Crown isexpressly included. Section 21, Patents and Designs Act, 2 of 1911,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2006

Bihar State Financial Corpn. and ors. Vs. Chemicot India Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230(A); ;Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3636(SC); IV(2006)BC132; [2006]133CompCas338(SC); [2006(4)JCR126(SC)]; 2006(8)SCALE525; (2006)7SCC293

to viability of revival of entire unit - Impugned judgment could not be sustained - Appeal allowed - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … to submit the following papers before the execution of the legal documents: (a) Income Tax Clearance Certificate under Section 230(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the Directors.(b) Original title deed in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2006

Falcon Retreat Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Edc Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4033(SC); [2006]133CompCas288(SC); 2006(8)SCALE458; [2007]80SCL151(SC)

it was entitled to take a decision which was in its interest - Special leave petition dismissed - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … that the Petitioner had committed defaults in payment of dues to Respondent No. 1. Action was taken under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act by the aforesaid respondent. The property in question was attached and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial