Advanced Search Results

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Major Ports Trust Act; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 46 and 50; Business of the Government of Pondicherry Rules, 1963 - Rule 5 and 5(2); Indian Major Ports Act, 1908; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(9); Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Pondicherry Administration Regulations Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 - Regulations 2 and 6; Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 - Sections 4; Environment Protection Act; General Financial Rules, 1963; Supreme Court Orders, 1960 - Order 16; Supreme Court Rules, 1960 - Rule 4(1); Delegation of Financial Rules - Rule 21; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 239, 239A and 240

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225

ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … Build Operate and Transfer (`BOT' for short) basis, (2) approval dated January 21, 2006 accorded by the Lt. Governor of Pondicherry to the detailed project … personal selection, is rejected.22.The contention that a conjoint reading of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution and Sections 46, 50 of the Government of Union Territories Act read with Rule 5 of the Rules of Business

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through … in the case of Onkarlal Nandlal vs. State of Rajsathan [1986 AIR 2146], there was no need to refer to any other provision of the

Delta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 6, 31, 32, 33, 35, 46, 47 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2 and 54A; Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Goa Barge Tax Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 220; Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 54, 55, 64

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110

(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … Rules came into force (on 15.4.1984), under Rule 64 read with Entry 21 (4)(A-iv) in the First Schedule of the said Rules; that the term … which the Act is extended by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also

Research Foundation for Science Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : HW Rules, 2003 - Rule 5; Gujarat Maritime Board (Prevention of Fire and Accidents for Safety and Welfare of Workers and Protection of Environment during Ship breaking Activities) Regulations, 2000

Reported in : AIR2007SC3118; JT2007(10)SC635; 2007(10)SCALE594; (2007)8SCC583; 2007(2)LC1080(SC)

comes into play, the recommendations shall be operative by virtue of this order - Petition disposed of - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … recommendations Recommendations to remain operative until concerned statutes are amended Until Code comes into play, recommendations made operative. Section 21; Ship Breaking Permission was granted after report of an expert committee. - For that purpose, it is necessary

HusseIn Abdul Rehman and Co. Vs. Lakhmichand Khetsey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1924)26BOMLR934; 84Ind.Cas.416

the land, the property leased is sufficiently described for the purposes of Section 21 of the Indian Registration Act 1908. - - The document also is endorsed by the Sub-Registrar on both occasions that 'Registration is refused' as … A). It purports to have been executed by Hussein Abdul Rehman & Co. to Lakhmichand Khetsey, The material portion of that document is in these terms:--We have taken from you on rent a godown bearing No. three.

Bihar State Financial Corpn. and ors. Vs. Chemicot India Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230(A); ;Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3636(SC); IV(2006)BC132; [2006]133CompCas338(SC); [2006(4)JCR126(SC)]; 2006(8)SCALE525; (2006)7SCC293

to viability of revival of entire unit - Impugned judgment could not be sustained - Appeal allowed - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … recommendations Recommendations to remain operative until concerned statutes are amended Until Code comes into play, recommendations made operative. Section 21; Ship Breaking Permission was granted after report of an expert committee. - Allegedly, the Managing director of the

Falcon Retreat Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Edc Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4033(SC); [2006]133CompCas288(SC); 2006(8)SCALE458; [2007]80SCL151(SC)

it was entitled to take a decision which was in its interest - Special leave petition dismissed - PORTS ACT, 1908[C.A. No. 15/1908] Sections 21 & 27; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ] Ship Breaking Stability and … recommendations Recommendations to remain operative until concerned statutes are amended Until Code comes into play, recommendations made operative. Section 21; Ship Breaking Permission was granted after report of an expert committee. - We are satisfied that this is

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … PETITION NO. 10363 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 11574 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 2173 OF 2021 (T-RES) IN WP No. 10234/2020 BETWEEN: CANARA BANK (FORMERLY SYNDICATE BANK) J.C. ROAD BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED HEREIN

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … PETITION NO. 10363 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 11574 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 2173 OF 2021 (T-RES) IN WP No. 10234/2020 BETWEEN: CANARA BANK (FORMERLY SYNDICATE BANK) J.C. ROAD BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED HEREIN

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … PETITION NO. 10363 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 11574 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 2173 OF 2021 (T-RES) IN WP No. 10234/2020 BETWEEN: CANARA BANK (FORMERLY SYNDICATE BANK) J.C. ROAD BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED HEREIN