Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 section 19 · Page 1 of about 437 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 1998

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

Senior Counsel points out that Section 133 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 has repealed the Indian Ports Act, 1908 as also the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 and, therefore, the regulations thereunder must be deemed to have … ORDER1. This judgment shall govern writ petition Nos.9469 and 9470 of 1998 as the parties are common and also the controversy involved. Common petitioner herein is a company registered under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … in respect of the bills of entry dated 04.12.2015 and 11.12.2015 prayed that the duty be assessed under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short ‘1962 Act’) and the goods be released, so as to … that the duty be assessed under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short ‘1962 Act’) and the goods be released, so as to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … dated 30th December, 1991 on the ground that the same was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 120 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and that the suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 01 1989

Mahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 67; Bombay Port Rules - Rules 4 and 19; Port Act, 1908 - Sections 6(1);

Reported in : AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)

have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 6(1)(k) of the Indian Ports Act 1908:6(1) The Government may, in addition to any rules which it may make under any other enactment for the … the police and the Port Trust authorities had adequate powers under the Port of Bombay Passenger Boat Rules, 1962 and Section 67 of the Bombay Police Act to regulate the manner in which the launches carried passengers.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2015

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Priyamvada and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

and her owner ought to have been situated within the Jurisdiction of this Honble Court as required under Section 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. But in the case of AL-Quamar (supra), the Honble Supreme Court … 1. Almost 20 years ago, on or about 5th June 1994, there was a collision at the port of Marmagoa, Goa between m.v.Sanjeevani owned by the plaintiffs and the 1st defendant vessel owned by the 2nd … which it is alleged that the incident of collision was caused by acts or omissions of the plaintiffs-vessel m.v. Sanjeevani and her complement. In the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … in G. O. No. Ms. 1517 Public General dated 10-3-1950 declaring under Section 16, Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, the People's Education Society as an unlawful assocn. The petnr. is the General Secretary of the People's Education

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2015

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2015

Subject : Arbitration

the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of S. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … unchallenged and which from their nature may reasonably be supposed to have affected the conduct of a large portion of the community in matters relating to rights of property: Young V. Robertson.” I have already said that … issued a Demand Notice upon the said M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act which notice was received by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1961

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Asit Ranjan Majumd ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-02-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1); ;Calcutta Ports Act, 1889 - Sections 5 and 126(3); ;Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1962Cal530

a citizen. The area of the Calcutta Port is defined by notification under Section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and under Section 6 of which the Government has power to make Port Rules for various purposes mentioned … as has been done by the judgment under appeal, and that our judgment in Appeal No. 35 of 1961, between Asit Ranjan Majumdar and Calcutta Dock Labour Board and Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta will accordingly,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1978

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-20-1978

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … the State Government to recover non-agricultural assessment in the sum of Rs. 56,06, 400/- for the revenue years 1963-64 to 1970-71 in respect of lands vesting in the Board by virtue of Clause (a) of Sub-section (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2003

P and O Australia Ports Pty Limited and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees, Jn ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 226; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 42(1), 42(3) and 49; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR733; 2004(1)CTLJ279(Bom); 2003(2)MhLj717

Matched in: Parties P and O Australia Ports Pty Limited and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees, Jnpt and anr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial