Advanced Search Results

Shanthi Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorized Signatory, Mr. P. Rav ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 24, 53, 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 55, 110, 110(2), and 111; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; Import Manifest (Vessels) Regulations, 1971; Goods Imported (Conditions of Transhipment) Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 3 to 6

Reported in : 2004(176)ELT87(Mad); (2004)4MLJ46

report, as the case may be, as for transhipment-(a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908) or the customs airport at Mumbai, Calcutta, Delhi or Chennai, or any other customs port … imported 46 containers, and insofar as 39 containers are concerned the Customs Duty was assessed at Rs.11,85,174/- under Section 17 of the Customs Act and for other 7 containers the customs duty is still to be assessed. The

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … any opportunity or warning before the order was made. On 31-3-1950 the Govt. passed a further order under Section 17 (E) (3), Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, declaring their intention to forfeit to the Govt. an amount of

Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Abg Heavy Industries Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

801A. The assessee supported its submission by referring to the definition of "port" as given in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 according to which a "port" would include any part of the river or channel in which the said … has erred in: 1. directing the Assessing Officer to deduct a sum of Rs. 13,15,01,864/- being deduction Under Section 80IA by holding that the assessee has carried on the business of developing, maintaining and operating any infrastructure

The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, a Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46, 125, 126, 446, 446(1) and 446(2); Visakhapatnam Steel Project (Acquisition of Land) Act, 1972; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 44A; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Andhra Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1968; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 15(2) and 66 - Schedule - Articles 65, 112 and 137; Government Grants Act, 1895; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 11, 32, 68, 73 and 73(2); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2); Central Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 5(1), 5(2) and 8A; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9; Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963; Chandigarh

Reported in : [2008]146CompCas399(AP)

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TP Act, for brevity). Be it noted, as per Section 17(2)(vii) of Registration Act, 1908, any grant/alienation of immovable property by Government does not require registration.When transfer of property is effected, by reason … over sick company. It was also brought to notice of Government that Government lands allotted to M/s. Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Bharat Heavy Plates and Vessels, and Hindustan Zinc Limited were not resumed as they were under process

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Miscellaneous

the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in terms of Section 10 of the said Act the Conservator can cause obstruction to be removed within the limits of port … a period from 08/01/1989 to 07/01/1990. The vessel was insured for Rs. 17,00,000/-. Besides the same, as per clause 9.1.2 of the Insurance Policy, the

Dy. Cit Vs. Abg Heavy Industries Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)303ITR328(Mum.)

80-1A. The assessee supported its submission by referring to the definition of "port" as given in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 according to which a "port" would include any part of the river or channel in which the said … has erred in: 1. directing the assessing officer to deduct a sum of Rs. 13,15,01,864 being deduction under Section 80-IA by holding that the assessee has carried on the business of developing, maintaining and operating any infrastructure

Sushant T. Karwarkar Vs. Mormugao Port Trust and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 5A; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Major Port Trust Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR493; 2006(2)BomCR915; [2006(110)FLR905]

retirement benefits.7. Parliament then enacted what is known as the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997 (Act, for short) which gave powers to the Central Government to direct the provisions of the Dock … Act, 1948. Section 2(d) defines 'Major Port' to have the same meaning as in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.9. Section 4 of the Act deals with the transfer of assets and liabilities of the Dock Labour Board, … retired as surplus by the said MDLB pursuant to its Resolution dated 17-3-1982 with consequential retirement benefits.7. Parliament then enacted what is known as the

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

for any act or default of any officer or servant appointed under this Act. or under the Indian Ports Act 1908, if the Board be appointed by Government under the Indian Ports Act to be conservator of the Port, … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and … of limitation observing as follows: "Ex. A. 9 (the suit notice dated 17-1-1956) seems to have been sent by the plaintiff's within six months from

Kandla Port Trust, Trustees of Board Vs. Asia Foundation and Construct ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 30 and 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)2GLR1459

of 1995 whereby he has made Umpire's award dated 5-5-1994 to be the rule of the Court under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and has upheld the rejection of the claim of defendant and decreed the … decreed the claim of the original plaintiff.2. The appellant i.e., original defendant, namely, Board of Trustees of the Port of Kandla, is a body corporate constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, (hereinafter referred to as

Air-conditioning Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board of Trustees for t ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Section 49; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 105 and 116; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2004Cal79

In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 49 and 52 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 asking the Court to declare the aforesaid two sections are ultra vires Constitution and therefore … ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 49 and 52 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 asking the Court to declare the aforesaid two … IEL & EL 12. In that case a lease was executed on 17th July, 1851 mentioning to give effect from 25th Dec. 1849 for a