Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ports act 1908 chapter 8 · Page 1 of about 116 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 2017

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

The works and services to be provided by the Trust at the Major Ports are set out in Chapter V of the Act. Chapter V-A which was introduced with effect from 09.01.1997 provides for fixation of tariff … to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … duty. However, on 05.03.2016, DRI sent another letter that provisional release be 8 allowed without waiting for measurement of goods. The fact however is that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1990

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1990

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 33, 34, 49 and 52; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the … land values periodically.The Consultants submitted a report on December 25, 1980. They explained their approach and methodology in Chapter III. It was made clear that the complexity of the assignment involved many aspects and that data had … of valuation of land and opted for a blockwise valuation. In para 8.9 this was explained. At the end the Consultants recommended thus :---'The land

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1989

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-25-1989

Subject : CustomsCivil

Acts : Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(6); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi289; 1994LC679(Delhi); 1992(58)ELT374(Del)

appearing for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2, has submitted that the Indian Ports Act. 1908, in its Chapter V, prescribes for port dues, fees and charges. Section 33(1), (2) and (4) read with Section 34 gives … calling at Paradip Port have been changed from 'Net Register Tonnage (for short 'N.R.T.') as stipulated under Indian Ports Act 1908 (for short the 'Act') to 'Gross Register Tonnage (for short 'G.R.T.'). According to the petitioners, the change so … 4. 3000-6999 2.50/GRT 5. 7000-14999 3.00/GRT 6. 15000-24999 3.00/GRT 7. 25000-39999 3.00/GRT 8. 40000 to above 3.50/GRT Note 1. Definition :- (I)Coastal coasting with reference

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2006

Dy. Cit Vs. Abg Heavy Industries Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)303ITR328(Mum.)

80-1A. The assessee supported its submission by referring to the definition of "port" as given in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 according to which a "port" would include any part of the river or channel in which the said … convenience of traffic, for safety of vessels, or for improvement, maintenance or good government of the port.Referring to Chapter V ("Works and services to be provided at ports") of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, he submitted … officer to deduct a sum of Rs. 13,15,01,864 being deduction under Section 80-IA by holding that the assessee has carried on the business of developing,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Miscellaneous

the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … the liability to settle the counterclaim raised by the defendant no. 2 lies on the defendant no. 1. 8. Issues came to be framed by the trial Court as per the rival contentions of the parties. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1964

B. Mohindeen Hajee Sons Vs. the Chairman, Mangalore Port Trust Board a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-1964

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Merchants Shipping Act, 1958; Mangalore Port Trust Act, 1953 - Sections 101(8); Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39 and 96; Madras Minor Ports Harbour Craft Rules, 1953 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1966Kant330; AIR1966Mys330; (1965)1MysLJ6

The petitioner also applied for a Harbour Craft License in respect of the Tug MUBARAK under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 read with the Harbour Craft Rules framed thereunder. The Port Authorities under Ex. A-4 stated that the application … have perpetual succession and a common seal and shall sue and be sued by the aforesaid name. Under Chapter V of the Act, the Board has the power to execute works in the Port Area and provide … navigation in sea ports of harbours. He invited our attention to paragraph 887 in Vol. 39 of Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd edition, where it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1984

Pratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-1984

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Guj68

limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … raised by 3' more, i.e. up to 5'-8'. Therefore, the compound walls were permitted 'to stay and the chapter was treated as closed. However, it appears that somewhere in the year 1970, present respondent No. 2, purchased

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2014

Awaaz Foundation, Public Charitable Trust, Mumbai and Another Vs. Stat ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2014

Subject : Environment

coastal areas at 48 places in the State of Maharashtra with demarcation/identification of the limits under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, have been notified. Obviously, beyond the limits of the areas covered by the Indian Ports Act, the creeks, … etc. Hence, the MPCB has no role to play in such matter. 8. Maharashtra Maritime Board-Respondent No.4 filed Affidavit of Shri V.B. Karande, Dy. Engineer, … is further stated that the sand dredging in the creeks of Raigarh District is permitted as provided under Chapter-(IV) and Rule 39(A) of the Maharashtra Mining Mineral Rules, 1955, as per procedure laid down in the Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2023

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2023

Subject : Arbitration

Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or … a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … to proper stamp. The adjudication is to be made by the Collector. Chapter IV contains Section 33 and the Chapter heading is ‘Instruments not duly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1917

Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Jensen

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-21-1917

Subject : Land Acquisition

is, a common carrier by railroad. It also owned and operated a steamship, El Oriente, plying between the ports of New York and Galveston, Texas." "2. On August 15, 1914, said steamship was berthed Page 244 U. … while engaged therein under the Federal Employers' Liability Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65, and no state statute can impose any … death of himself or another." "This claim comes within the meaning of Chapter 67 of the Consolidated Laws as reenacted and amended by Chapter 41 … admiralty and maritime jurisdiction," and Art. I, § 8, conferring on Congress power to make all laws … SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Syllabus The Federal Employers' Liability Act applies only where the injury occurs in railroad operations or their adjuncts, and cannot be extended to interstate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial