Advanced Search Results

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … could not have been extended to any other person. It is his submission that the holistic reading of Chapter 5 of Finance Act, 1994 and the amendments made thereto by including further category of services as taxable … Revenue on the judgment of Western Agencies Pvt. Ltd. [2008 (12) STR 739] is also incorrect as Western Agencies decision has not referred to the

Vasantkumar Radhakisan Vora and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1984Bom96; 1984(2)BomCR478; ILR1984Bom1784a

of limitation prescribed by this sub-section the provisions contained in Ss. 4, 5 and 12 of the Limitation Act, 1908, shall, so far as may be, apply.18. No further appeal shall lie against any decision in appeal under … amendment of 1976. By the amending ACt of 1963 the provisions of Chapter VII with which we are concerned were amended so as to confer … be stated. In Writ Petition NO. 3144 of 1981 the respondents are the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay. They owned a property bearing old B. B. NO. 941 situated at Jackeria Bunder Boad, Bombay … Bench of this Court in Monads Vishindas Chainani v. Hiranand Assumal (1874) 76 Bom LR 494. In that case the Division Bench has elaborately considered

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

The works and services to be provided by the Trust at the Major Ports are set out in Chapter V of the Act. Chapter V-A which was introduced with effect from 09.01.1997 provides for fixation of tariff … to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9831-32 OF2017[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 771-772 of 2017]. Mumbai Port Trust ... Appellant Versus M/s. Shri Lakshmi Steels

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 33, 34, 49 and 52; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the … land values periodically.The Consultants submitted a report on December 25, 1980. They explained their approach and methodology in Chapter III. It was made clear that the complexity of the assignment involved many aspects and that data had … Act). The BPT's real estate, including structures, covers an area of about 720 hectares. The land owned by the BPT ranges from Colaba to Ravli

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCivil

Acts : Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(6); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi289; 1994LC679(Delhi); 1992(58)ELT374(Del)

appearing for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2, has submitted that the Indian Ports Act. 1908, in its Chapter V, prescribes for port dues, fees and charges. Section 33(1), (2) and (4) read with Section 34 gives … calling at Paradip Port have been changed from 'Net Register Tonnage (for short 'N.R.T.') as stipulated under Indian Ports Act 1908 (for short the 'Act') to 'Gross Register Tonnage (for short 'G.R.T.'). According to the petitioners, the change so … II-SECTION 3-SUB Section (1) No. 390, New Delhi, Saturday, September 29, 1984/ASVINA 7, 1906 Ministry of Shipping and Transport (Ports Wing) Notification New Delhi, the

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Miscellaneous

the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … defendant no. 1 is liable to indemnify the plaintiff and consequently to pay Rs.13,00,000/- towards the bill no. 7/B/MS/89 dated 26/12/1989 and further to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 26,30,174.88 along with interest @

Pratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Guj68

limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … raised by 3' more, i.e. up to 5'-8'. Therefore, the compound walls were permitted 'to stay and the chapter was treated as closed. However, it appears that somewhere in the year 1970, present respondent No. 2, purchased … the said land without previous permission of the first respondent under S. 7 of the Gandhidham Act, and hence, it was an unauthorised construction. According

Awaaz Foundation, Public Charitable Trust, Mumbai and Another Vs. Stat ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Environment

coastal areas at 48 places in the State of Maharashtra with demarcation/identification of the limits under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, have been notified. Obviously, beyond the limits of the areas covered by the Indian Ports Act, the creeks, … these premises, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 sought dismissal of the Application. 7. On behalf of Respondent No.3-Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) Shri S.K. Morey, … is further stated that the sand dredging in the creeks of Raigarh District is permitted as provided under Chapter-(IV) and Rule 39(A) of the Maharashtra Mining Mineral Rules, 1955, as per procedure laid down in the Government

M/S. Sardesai Transhippers Pvt. Ltd., and Etc. Vs. State of Goa and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 38, 40, 43, 54, 64 and 67; Constitution of India - Article 165; Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1997Bom326

counsel for the petitioners, namely the validity of the imposition of wharfage under the provisions of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and the Rules made thereunder. Therefore, we venture to examine in this petition the legality or otherwise of … storage of goods, operation of space in landing, etc. and prescribe fees and dues chargeable under the Rules. Chapter IV of the said Rules has the caption : 'Landing and wharfage'. Rule 38 deals with the manner … this Court by way of writ petitions. Those writ petitions numbering about 76 were however, disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court by

Shree Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT407TriDel

in the import manifest as for transhipment - (a) to any major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908), or the customs airport at Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi or Madras, or any other customs port … Customs until cleared for home consumption or are warehoused or are transhipped in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VIII (Section 45). (b) In case of import of goods other than goods intended for transit or for … was worked out at Rs. 24,02,400/- CIF and market value at Rs. 72,07,200/-. Ultimately, notice was issued by the Asstt. Collector to show cause to