Advanced Search Results
Sunder Dumanna Shetty Vs. K.D. Billimoria and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-03-1958
Constitution
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2(10), 33, 33(1), 33(7), 110 and 167; Bombay Police Rules - Rules 5, 5(1), 8(1), 10, 11, 12, 13-A, 13-A(4), 17-A(1), 19-A, 21(1), 22, 23, 24, 27 and 33(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6) and 226; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 24-A; Bombay City Police Act, 1902 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953; Ajmer Government Wards Regulation, 1888 - Sections 6 and 7; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1); Cotton Textile (Control of Movement) Order 1948; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Drugs Act, 1940
AIR1959Bom346; (1958)60BOMLR1314
to as 'the hotel'. A licence had been issued to the petitioner under the provisions of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, being licence No. 970/EHL 1954-55 in respect of the said hotel. The said licence was renewed from … keep or supply therein any foreign liquor, country liquor or intoxicating drug as defined by the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, or any opium as defined by the said Act or shall permit to be consumed in such place … do is to issue an order that a reasonable suspicion exists in their mind that an offence under Section 5 has been committed. The section does not provide for the issue of a notice to the person concerned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai NaraIn Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Delhi
May-31-1985
Service
Police Act, 1961 - Sections 7; Punjab Police Rules - Rules 12.8(1) and 13.18; Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1949 - Rule 5
ILR1986Delhi272
and whether his services can be terminated under Rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1949. The petitioner in that case was directly appointed as a Head Constable in Delhi Police Force on July … and the contravention of the Conduct Rules which render you liable for action under section 7 of the Police Act V of 1961.'(3) The first submission of Mr. Kathuria in support 'of his contention that the inquiry held
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of M.P. Vs. Davendra
Supreme Court of India
May-05-2009
Criminal
Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 54A; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 93; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 18 and 19; Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 23(1) and 23(2); Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 55, 56 and 122; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 54, 55 and 96; Karnataka Habitual Offenders Act, 1961; Karnataka Prohibition of Beggary Act, 1975 - Sections 11(2) and 12(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 160, 161, 170(2), 171 and 439; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 55 and 118
AIR2009SC3009; 2009CriLJ4130; JT2009(13)SC679; RLW2010(1)SC164; 2009(8)SCALE816:2009AIRSCW4840
police officer so requires it and it has to be done in the prescribed manner. So far as Section 5 is concerned it deals with the power of the Magistrate to direct any person for measurement or photographs … of the Bombay Beggars Act, 1945;(ii) in connection with an offence punishable under Section 122 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, or under Section 6 or 9 of the Bombay Beggars Act, 1945, or in connection with an … Clause (b) of Section 3, add the following at the end:or under Section 93 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.[Bombay Act 58 of 1953].Maharasthra- For Section 3, substitute the following namely,3. Taking of measurements, etc., of convicted persons.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.R.S. Mani Vs. District Magistrate and anr.
Chennai
Mar-21-1949
CriminalConstitution
Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(5), 15 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 2(1), 3(1), 151 and 491
AIR1950Mad162
detention dated 1st April 1948 and the applicant was arrested on the same day. He was kept in police custody at Madura till 3rd April when he was removed to the Central Jail, Vellore. The grounds of … The Government referred the matter to the Advisory Council on 14th February 1949 and the matter is still pending with it. This application was filed … shall be in force for six months from the date on which it is confirmed or modified under Sub-section (5) of Section 3. If the authority concerned did not carry out his statutory duties, the petitioner could have … raise common questions of law under the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, I [1] of 1947.2. The facts and the contentions peculiar to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavindra Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-06-2007
ServiceConstitution
. Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 311; Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 - Rules 5(1); Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 27
2007(5)ALD527
the State of Gujarat.(2) In April, 1988, the petitioner took part in the test conducted by Central Reserve Police Force (for short, 'the CRPF') at Ahmedabad for recruitment of constables from the domiciles of Gujarat. On being … an offence of misconduct in his capacity as a member of the Force under Section 11(1) of C.R.P.C. Act, 1949 in that he produced fake domicile certificate of Gujarat State at the time of enlistment and got enrolled … services of the petitioner and 12 other constables be terminated under Rules 5(1) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 (for short, 'the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarun Kumar Sengupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Kolkata
Apr-18-1972
Constitution
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 3, 6 and 16; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 372
AIR1973Cal56
1935, was incompetent to legislate on the subject of the police. It was urged that the Central Reserve Police Act, 1949 was in essence and in pith and substance a legislation dealing with the police. It was also pointed … 3 provides for the constitution of the force, Section 4 deals with appointment and powers of superior officers, Section 5 with enrolment, Section 6 with resignation and withdrawal from the Force. Section 7 deals with general duties of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Palit Vs. the State
Kolkata
May-19-1961
Criminal
West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949 - Sections 4(2), 5(1) and 5(2); ;West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 2 and 3; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 190, 190(1), 193 and 251A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 417
AIR1961Cal560,1961CriLJ617,65CWN977
the trial of warrant cases by Magistrates, instituted otherwise than on a police report. This provision is in consonance with the avowed object of speedy … of reference :' (1) Does the Special Judge appointed under the West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Spe-cial Courts) Act, 1949, to whom the case has been allotted by notification under Section 4 (2) or the Act need a … the schedule to be tried by them, shall be made by the State Government.5. It is followed by Section 5 which prescribes the procedure and powers of the Special Courts. Section 5 (1) of the Act expressly provides
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Sansar Chand and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-16-1959
LimitationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 149; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 73, 126 and 127
AIR1960HP1
6. Whether the defendants were bound to provide! the defendants with a police guard on octroi posts and whether the guard was withdrawn during the … district, by the Himachal Pradesh (Application of Laws) Order, 1948, dated 25-12-1948 and by the Merged (States) Laws Act, 1949, which came into force on 1-1-1950. It has not been shown that prior to merger any legislation parallel … the renewed hearing on 12-6-1959, an application, purporting to be under Section 149, Civil P. C., read with Section 5, Limitation Act, supported by an affidavit, was submitted by Mr, Sethi, counsel for the appellant. A reply thereto,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukhtiar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-20-1992
Criminal
East Punjab Children Act, 1949 - Sections 27, 60, 60(1) and 60(2); Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144, 313 and 318; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 354, 379, 427, 428, 429, 452 and 506; Punjab Police Rules - Rule 24.5
1992CriLJ2968
8) then instructed Khushminder Singh, Sarpanch (P.W. 12) to return to the spot, while he himself rushed to Police Station Sadar, Patiala and lodged report Exhibit PN at 8-30 p.m. with Inspector Mohinder Singh (P W 19). … offence, was however, ordered to be released under the provisions of Section 27 of the East Punjab Children Act, 1949, as the trial Court found that he was not unruly or so depraved of a character which called … Each one of them was also sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 500/- or in default of payment thereof to further undergo six months' rigorous
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.N. Rishbud and Vs. the State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Dec-14-1954
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 161, 165, 165-A, 169 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5, 54, 128, 129, 154, 155, 156, 156(1), 156(2), 162, 168, 170, 173, 190, 190(1), 193, 195, 199, 202, 217, 225-A and 233
AIR1955SC196; 1955CriLJ526; [1955]1SCR1150
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. 2. Under section 5(4) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, a police officer below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police shall not investigate any offence punishable under sub-section … first information reports in these cases were laid in April and June, 1949, but permission of the magistrate, for investigation as against the public servants … basis of which the appellants were being prosecuted were in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and hence illegal. In Appeal No. 95 of 1954 the appellants
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »