Advanced Search Results
Gopal Ch. Paul Vs. Smt. Amala Mondal
Kolkata
Oct-12-1988
TenancyCivil
Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2), 3, 3(8) and 5;; West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 1, 1(2), 2, 2(2) and (5), 7, 9, 20 and 70;; Transfer Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 47;; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 3;; Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1966 - Section 1;; Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1886 - Section I;; Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1969 - Section 2;; West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1974 - Section 2;; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1);; West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3 and 4(4);; Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Amendment) Ordinance, 1987;; The Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Reg
AIR1990Cal105,93CWN514
of Calcutta as may have been or may hereafter be notified under Section 1 of the Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1966 and are not included within Calcutta as so defined and also to the municipality of Howrah.'Thereafter, the … of Property Act and there was nothing to show that the provisions of the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 automatically became applicable to the disputed land after the withdrawal of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act from the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Dumanna Shetty Vs. K.D. Billimoria and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-03-1958
Constitution
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2(10), 33, 33(1), 33(7), 110 and 167; Bombay Police Rules - Rules 5, 5(1), 8(1), 10, 11, 12, 13-A, 13-A(4), 17-A(1), 19-A, 21(1), 22, 23, 24, 27 and 33(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6) and 226; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 24-A; Bombay City Police Act, 1902 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953; Ajmer Government Wards Regulation, 1888 - Sections 6 and 7; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1); Cotton Textile (Control of Movement) Order 1948; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Drugs Act, 1940
AIR1959Bom346; (1958)60BOMLR1314
to as 'the hotel'. A licence had been issued to the petitioner under the provisions of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, being licence No. 970/EHL 1954-55 in respect of the said hotel. The said licence was renewed from … keep or supply therein any foreign liquor, country liquor or intoxicating drug as defined by the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, or any opium as defined by the said Act or shall permit to be consumed in such place … under Rule 13-A (4) of the rules framed under the provisions of section 33 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The said rule provides as … 1. Sunder Dumanna Shetty, the petitioner herein, is the proprietor of an eating
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoginder Pal Vs. Union of India and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-22-2015
Education
proved, vide Office order dated 08.09.2011, a departmental enquiry under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the "1949 Act"), read with Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Singaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-04-2003
Service
Central Reserve Police Act, 1949 - Sections 11 and 11(1)
2003(3)ALD504; 2003(3)ALT433
learned Single Judge for disposal according to law. Service - termination - Section 11 (1) of Central Reserve Police Act, 1949 - petition filed against Order of dismissal from service by way of punishment - petitioner misbehaved and disobeyed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArti Devi @ Arti Pandey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Patna
Jun-25-2003
Civil
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1); Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 108
claims to be the widow of Shyam Kishore Pandey, who was a Constable in F/36th Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force and had proceeded on 60 days' leave with effect from 7-6-1995 to 5-8-1995 and became traceless since … of the enquiry report penalty of dismissal from service with effect from 26-12-1996 under Section 11(1) of CRPF, Act, 1949 read with Rule 27 of CRPF. Rules, 1955 was passed. 6. According to the respondents, the petitioner is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal and anr. Vs. Tarun Kumar Sen Gupta and anr.
Kolkata
Jul-25-1972
Constitution
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 1, 3 and 9; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 246 and 372
AIR1974Cal39
Central Reserve Police Force'. Section 1 of the Act describes the title as 'The Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949'. Section 1(2) describes the extension of this Act and provides : 'It extends to the whole of India and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatan Singh Ramsingh Rajput Vs. M.V. Chitale and Another
Mumbai
Aug-01-1986
Criminal
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 57, 57(1) and 59; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65, 66, 66A and 68
1986(3)BomCR709; (1986)88BOMLR548
allowed. Bombay Police Act (Bom. XXII of 1951), Sections 57(b), 59 - Bombay Prohibition Act (Bom. XXV of 1949), Section 66(b)--Two fold requirement for externment order under Section 57--Show cause notice reciting fact of two convictions under Section … in the present petition is an order of externment passed under S. 57(b) read with S. 59, Bombay Police Act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The notice issued under S. 59 preceding the impugned order dt. … person has been convicted - (a) ............ (b) twice or more of an offence under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, not being an offence under Ss. 65, 66A or 68, or (ba) ............ (c) ............ the Commissioner, the … externment passed under S. 57(b) read with S. 59, Bombay Police Act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The notice issued under S. 59
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Venugopal and ors.
Chennai
Jan-27-1954
Criminal
Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 49A and 49A(1); Madras City Police (Amendment) Act, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 19(6); Madras City Police Gaming Rules, 1949 - Rule 3
AIR1954Mad901
Madras City Police Act (Act 3 of 1888) as amended by the Madras City Police Act Gaming (Amendment) Act, 1949, (Madras Act 7 of 1949} a new Section (Section 49A) was introduced in 1949. That section is in … Venugopal, who has been charged by the state before the Third Presidency Magistrate, under Section 49A, Madras City Police Act, for the alleged offence of keeping for sale a bi-weekly called 'the Original Vel Sporting News' printed and … call for the records in the said C. C. No. 5429 of 1953 on the file of the Third Presidency Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras and quash
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Tiwari, Constable Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Group ...
Allahabad
May-25-1999
Service
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 1, 2, 2(4), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7(2), 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1) and (2), 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(2), 17, 18, 18(2) and (3) and 19; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1949 - Rules 27, 27A, 27(1), 107 and 110; Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16, 16(3), 33, 35, 226, 311 and 311(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Central Reserve Police Forec (Amendment) Rules, 1955 - Rules 4, 4A, 5, 6 and 7; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 103 to 110; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 36(E) and 36(F)
1999(4)AWC2908; (1999)2UPLBEC1494
evidence on record and further that charge-sheet was served upon him under Section 11 of the Central Reserve Police Act, 1949 (hereinafter called the Act) which provides for minor punishment. Therefore, the punishment of dismissal was not permissible as … Palok Basu and R.R.K. Trivedi, JJ. 1. Madan Tiwari has challenged his dismissal order dated 17.8.1991 passed by the Commandant, 7 Battalion, Central Reserve Police'
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoshan Beevi and ors. Vs. Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu ...
Chennai
Nov-09-1983
CriminalCustoms
Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 21, 22, 22(2) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 193, 225, 228, 241, 339 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 36(1), 43, 45, 45(1), 46, 160(1), 164, 167(1), 438 and 439; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27
1984(15)ELT289(Mad)
of an abducted person by a police officer under Section 4 of the Abducted Persons' (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949 (Act 65 of 1949) and the delivery of such person by him into the custody of the officer … respective cases, passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the COFEPOSA Act). 2. One of the main grounds raised in all these writ
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »