Advanced Search Results
In Re: B.N. Ramakrishna Naidu and anr.
Chennai
Sep-14-1954
CriminalConstitution
Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 65; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 114 and 118; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107, 342 and 342(2); Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7
AIR1955Mad100; 1955CriLJ452
course. 48. But it has been enacted that the entireAct 5 of 1861 shall, for the purpose of Section 2 ofthe Police Act 3 of 1888, be deemed to takeeffect throughout British India. (See Section 2(6) ofAct 3 … on record the prosecution had not brought home the offence to the accused under Section 65, Madras City Police Act, 1888; and secondly Section 65, Madras City Police Act, 1888 offended Article 14 of the Constitution of India and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.P.H.C. of A.P. Vs. Mohd. Mansoor and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-14-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 153-A, 153-B, 161, 162, 165A, 420, and 471; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 35; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 4 and 6; Evidence Act - Sections 5, 27, 145 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 41, 42, 52, 156(2) and 161; Indian Police Act, 1861; Police (Amendment) Act, 1888; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District Police Act, 1859 - Sections 21; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) District Police Act, 1329 Fasli - Sections 19; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Tamilnadu Prohibition Act - Sections 4(1)A; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2)
2001(1)ALT(Cri)275; 2001CriLJ3169
2, 41, 42, 52, 156 (2) and 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, Indian Police Act, 1861 Police (Amendment) Act, 1888, Section 21 of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District police Act, 1859, Section 19 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) District … from the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, the provisions of the Indian Police Act, 1861 and the Police Act, 1888 shall have to be considered. The Police force is constituted for the main purposes of detecting the crime,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. K. R. Lakshmanan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another
Supreme Court of India
Jan-12-1996
Criminal
Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 42 to 48 and 49A; Madras City Police and Gaming (Amendment) Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 4 and 5; Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930 - Sections 4 and 11; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1986 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1 and 6), 32, 39, 226 and 301; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; The Public Gambling Act, 1867; Prize Competitions Act, 1955; Tamil Nadu Horse Races (Abolition and Wagering or Betting) 1974 - Sections 2; Hyderabad Gambling Act - Sections 14
AIR1996SC1153; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)798; [1996]86CompCas66(SC); 1996CriLJ1635; [1997]223ITR601(SC); JT1996(1)SC173; 1996(1)SCALE208; (1996)2SCC226; [1996]1SCR395
'gambling'?2. What is the meaning of expression 'mere skill' in terms of Section 19(1)(g) of the Madras City Police Act, 1888 (The Police Act) and Section 11 of the Madras Gaming Act, 1930 (the Gaming Act)?3. Whether the running
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: C.N. Annadurai and ors.
Chennai
Apr-16-1958
ConstitutionCriminal
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 41; Indian Police Act - Sections 30(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144
AIR1959Mad63; 1959CriLJ204; (1958)IIMLJ363
not be a third head of attack.19. We answer the reference accordingly. Madras City Police Act (II of 1888), Section 41--Valid--No violation of the provisions of Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (b) of Constitution-- General Order of Commissioner … persons were charged in that case for having committed an offence punishable under Section 41 of the City Police Act. The case of the prosecution was that the accused had committed the offence by having proceeded towards the … disturbance of the peace. So, he gave them such an order, on 2-1-1958, after they had published notices that they wanted to hold black flag
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL. Ravindran Vs. the Commissioner of Police,
Chennai
Mar-22-2010
Criminal
Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 49A and 75; ;Town Nuisance Act - Section 3; ;Madras Gaming Act, 1930 - Section 4; ;Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(4), 3, 5, 6, 8 and 16(1); ;Police Act, 1861 - Section 23; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 75, 160, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 239, 240, 242, 243, 294, 299, 307, 308, 310, 322, 326, 327, 328, 329, 332, 333, 369, 382, 383, 385, 386, 387, 390, 391, 392 to 394, 395 to 402, 457, 458, 459 and 460; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 106, 107, 109, 110 and 356; ;Punjab Police Rules, 1933 - Rule 23.4(3) and 23.9(2); ;Punjab Police Rules, 1934
purveyors of liquor.(G.O.Ms. No. 3461, Home, 10th Dec. 1956)Persons either convicted under Section 49-A of the Madras City Police Act, 1888 (Madras Act III of 1888) or under Section 4 of the Madras Gaming Act, 1930 (Madras Act III … each such person whether he would come within the definition of a 'Habitual Offender' in Clause (4) of Section 2 of the Act. If, on examination of the facts, it is found that he had committed offences in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Alli Hassan Limbuvala
Mumbai
Sep-28-1932
Criminal
AIR1933Bom63; (1932)34BOMLR1662
and have nothing to add. Bombay Public Conveyances Act (Bom. VII of 1920), Section 26-Police Act (III of 1888), Section 2-Precincts of Victoria Terminus Station in Bombay created general police district-Precincts of part of city of Bombay-Jurisdiction of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGuru Prasad Biswas and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-22-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 31, 38(1), 39(F), 46, 51A, 226 and 300(A);; West Bengal Gambling & Prize Competition Act, 1957 - Section 2(A, B, C and D);; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18(2), 23 and 30;; Police Act, 1861 - Sectin 49;; Gambling Act;; Hindu Law;; Race Course Betting Act, 1928;; Betting Act, 1853;; Betting (Amendment) Act, 1926;; Betting Houses Act, 1953;; Street Betting Act, 1906;; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and transfer of undertaking) Act, 1986;; Company Act, 1956;; Gaming Act, 1845 - Section 18;; Gaming (Amendment) Act, 1892 - Section 1;; Income Tax Act, 1961;; Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 4, 11 and 49(A);; Madras Gaming Act, 1930;; Hyderabad Gambling Act, 1305F - Section 14
(1998)2CALLT215(HC)
not gambling.80. The Supreme Court in this connection considered sections 4, 11 and 49A of the Madras City Police Act, 1888. The question arose before the Supreme Court whether 'wagering' or 'betting' on horse racing is 'gaming' as defined … has further submitted that in this writ petition the vires of the exception part in Claused (b) of section 2 and in sections 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D of the said Act are challenged on the ground that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.Pavendhan. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jun-11-2012
Constitution
Bombay City Police Act - Section 41, 33(1)(o); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(a), 19(2); Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Section 41
similar situation on the powers conferred on the Commissioner of Police under Section 41 of the Madras City Police Act, 1888, this Court (R. Jayasimha Babu, J.) vide judgment in P. Nedumaran v. State of Tamil Nadu and others … This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the second
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahul Hameed Vs. S. Sankar Ganesh and Others
Chennai Madurai
Nov-25-2016
Land Acquisition
Constitution of India, 1950 Article 19(1)(a)(b) Tamil Nadu Public Properties (Damage and Loss) Act Section 3 Madras City Police Act, 1888 Section 41 Madras District Police Act, 1859 Section 21, Section 42-A Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 144, Section … filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 04.12.2015 made in W.P.(MD) No.21423 of 2015.) Judgment: M.Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. By consent, this Writ Appeal is taken up for final disposal. 2. Mr.Shahul Hameed,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Veerakumar. Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Chennai
Jul-19-2012
Constitution
Bombay Police Act - Section 30(2), 33(1)(o); Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 - Section 157; Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Section 41; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(a), 19(2)
similar situation on the powers conferred on the Commissioner of Police under Section 41 of the Madras City Police Act, 1888, this Court (R. Jayasimha Babu, J.) vide judgment in P. Nedumaran v. State of Tamil Nadu and others … This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »