Advanced Search Results

Ram Nath and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 45 and 46; Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 - Rule 6.22; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157, 162 and 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2276; 2005(2)WLC351

ranks. The State of Rajasthan in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 45 and 46 of the Police Act, 1861 enacted the Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 (for short 'Police Rules'). This Court had occasion to consider Police Rules … of Kailash. Learned Judge vide judgment dated May 24, 2000 convicted and sentenced each of the accused under Section 302 IPC to suffer Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 2500/-, in default to further suffer six

Narayan Hari Tarkhande Vs. Yeshwant Raoji Naik

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1928Bom352; (1928)30BOMLR1018

but he contended that the prosecution was time-barred under Sub-section (3) of Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890. This sub-section says :-In any case of an alleged offence by a Magistrate, police-officer or other person... … 8 B.H.C.195. Under 55 & 56 Vic c. 14, Section 5(passed in 1892 to amend the Indian Councils Act 1861) power was given to amend any law made before this Act, with the previous sanction of the Governor … months of the wrong complained of, otherwise the complaint would be dismissed. 45. The defendants raised a preliminary objection that the suit was bad for

Surya Prakash Mathur Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(2)WLC317; 1994(2)WLN571

deprecated.14. It is pertinent to mention here that Rajasthan State Government in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 45 and 46 of the Police Act, 1861 (Act No. V of 1861) framed statutory Rules known as Rajasthan … to appreciate the controversy involved in the present revision petition, the mandatory provision of Section 29 of the Police Act 1861 is reproduced below in extenso:Section 29 Penalties for neglect of duty etc.:Every Police Officer who shall be guilty

Chhutanlal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 1, 25 and 26

Reported in : AIR1968Raj70; 1968CriLJ385

various States including the State of Rajasthan have made rules in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 45 and 46 of the Police Act 1861 and they contain provisions with regard to custody and disposal of … as also the moveable property then found in the house purporting to act under Section 25 of the Police Act, 1861, (hereinafter called the Act). An inventory of the said property was furnished to the Additional District Magistrate, Jaipur

Manvendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj310

(for short 'Rules') were made in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 45 and 46 of the Police Act, 1861. Rule 3.1 of the Rules which relates to the officer incharge of the Police Station, reads as under:3.1 … dead body of unknown woman was floating in the well. The appellant registered Mrig Report No. 3/82 under Section 174 CrPC and handed over inquiry to Hajari Lal, Asstt. Sub-Inspector. Hajari Lal immediately went to the spot,

Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt.of U.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is maintained not under Section 154 of the Code but under the provisions of Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861 in the States to which it applies, or under the respective provisions of the Police Act(s) applicable to

The State of Punjab Vs. Barkat Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 9(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Police Act, 1861; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : AIR1962SC276; 1985(5)LC2194(SC); [1962]3SCR338

force regulating the manner of place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise dealing with such offences. 42. Police Act, 1861. Section 1........... the word 'police' shall include all persons who shall be enrolled under this Act. 43. Sea Customs … practice of torture by the police for the purpose of extracting confessions from persons in their custody. ' 45. So too, Mahmood, J., in Queen Empress v. Babulal I.L.R(1884) . 6 All. 509), gave the following reasons

Deokinandan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1936All753; 165Ind.Cas.701

not in the hands of the superior police authorities. Act 5 of 1861 defined the word 'police' as including all persons who were enrolled under … in common parlance as indicating an officer belonging to the police force, or one may refer to the Police Act and Police Regulations for the purpose of ascertaining who is a Police Officer. Under Act 20 of 1856 … not regarded as officers of the force who come down up to the grade of constables only. In Section 45, Criminal P.C., Act 5 of 1898, village headman, village accountant, village watchman, village owner or occupier of land

Malkiyat Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 16 - Sections 38(1)(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1112

are with jurisdiction under Ppr 16.3.8(1) and (2) or contrary to the mandatory statutory provisions. (10) The Punjab Police Act, 1861 was enacted for the regnlation of Police. The Magistrate of the District is defined in the interpretation clause, … their protective custody. (2) Fir No. 728173 was registered on May 25. 1973 at police station Daryaganj under Sections 363/366 Indian Penal Code on a complaint by one Shri Narinder Kumar, father of Miss Shashi Bala against … Reliance by Ms. Ahlawat on 'State v. Hussain Mirda', A.I.R. 1960 Assam 45(1) and 'State v. B.C. Khorey', A.I.R: 1962 Bombay 168(2) is misplaced. In

Vakamulla Chandrashekhar vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Division Bench of Punjab & Haryana High Court, inter alia, observed:"38. Apart from the police constituted under the Police Act, 1861, certain Officers of specified organizations have been invested powers of an Officer in-charge of a Police Station. With … provisions of the PMLA, the offence under the PMLA shall not be investigated by a police officer (see Section 45(1A), unless specifically authorized by the Central Government generally or by a special order, and subject to the conditions