Advanced Search Results

Abdul Halim Vs. State Through Abdul Haq and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 44; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 295(14) and 295(15); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107, 151, 172 and 439; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1966All222; 1966CriLJ498

contradict the police officer in case he uses the diary to refresh his memory.5. Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861, directs an officer in charge of a police station to keep a general diary and to record therein

Sk Johny and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : District Police Law - Sections 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 166; Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 482; Indian Police Act, 1861 - Sections 29; Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)176; 2000(4)ALT127

before C.M.M. against police for the offence under Sec.44 of District Police Laws and Section 29 of Indian Police Act, 1861 and Section 166 of IPC., and for giving false report prosecute PW2 M. Apparao for the offence under

Budh Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302 and 307; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157, 161, 172 and 174; Constitution of India - Article 21; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 97, 108 and 109; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 44

Reported in : AIR2006SC2500; 2006CriLJ2886; 2006(5)SCALE666; (2006)9SCC731

not do so, although, the same was required to be done in terms of Section 44 of the Police Act 1861, which is in the following terms:44. Police-officers to keep diary.- It shall be the duty of every officer

Raj Kumar Karwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 21(2); Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 154, 162, 173, 176, 190(1) and 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 21, 23, 29, 30, 35, 36-A, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52-A, 53, 54, 55, 57 and 67; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135A; Opium Act, 1856; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 25; International Covenant on Economical, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966 - Article 12; Police Act, 1861; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167(81); Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1991SC45; 1991CriLJ97; 1990(2)Crimes435(SC); 1990(48)ELT496(SC); JT1990(1)SC503; 1990(1)SCALE509; (1990)2SCC409; [1990]2SCR63; 1990(2)LC373(SC); 1991 Cri LJ 197

they are called. This Court, by majority, pointed out that the primary function of the police under the Police Act, 1861, is prevention and detection of crime while the Customs Officers are mainly interested in the detection and prevention … possession and such possession appears to him unlawful, arrest him, and any other person in his company. By Section 44 the provisions of Sections 41, 42 and 43 are made applicable in relation to offences concerning coca plant,

Kirpal Mohan Virmani Vs. B.D. Mishra

Court : Delhi

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 53

Reported in : 1989(3)Crimes146; 37(1989)DLT362; 1989(16)DRJ257; 1989(20)ECC28

expression 'Police Officer' used in Section 25 is not defined in the Evidence Act. Section 1 of the Police Act, 1861 defines 'Police' as including all persons enrolled under that Act. primarily, the term 'Police Officer' in Section 25 … belief'.(16) Section 43 empowers an officer authorised under Section 42 to seize and search in public place. Under Section 44 the provisions contained in Section 41, 42 and 43 shall apply in relation to the offences punishable under

Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt.of U.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is maintained not under Section 154 of the Code but under the provisions of Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861 in the States to which it applies, or under the respective provisions of the Police Act(s) applicable to

Dr. Y. Manjunath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is maintained not under Section 154 of the Code but under the provisions of Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861 in the States to which it applies, or under the respective provisions of the Police Act(s) applicable to

State. By Lokayukta Police Vs. H Srinivas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

there is any inconsistency in the provisions of Section 154 of the Code and Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861, with regard to the fact as to whether the FIR is to be registered in the FIR book

Prithipal Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 7; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rules 16.28, 44, 45 and 46; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR904]; JT2006(9)SC495; 2006(11)SCALE28; 2007(3)SLJ293(SC)

to complete it and the provisions of Rule 16.28 of the Rules read with Section 7 of the Police Act, 1861 could not have been circumvented in such a manner. It was categorically held:.As soon as a stigma is … Security Officer and Ors. v. Singasan Rabi Das : (1991)ILLJ308SC , stating:.It is common ground that under Rules 44 to 46 of the said Rules the normal procedure for removal of an employee is that before any

Venkata Ramanaswamy and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented By ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

there is any inconsistency in the provisions of Section 154 of the Code and Section 44 of the Police Act, 1861, with regard to the fact as to whether the FIR is to be registered in the FIR book