Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: police act 1861 section 38 · Page 1 of about 310 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 1999

Kinkar Karmakar and ors. Vs. Government of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-21-1999

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitutional of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 19, 21, 23, 23(2), 38, 39, 41, 43 and 226;; West Bengal Home Guards Act, 1962 - Sectons 2(3), 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9;; West Bengal Home Guards (Amendment) Act, 1990;; West Bengal Home Guards Rules, 1962 - Rules 5, 7 and 8;; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 1, 6(1) and 23;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 25;; West Bengal Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rule, 1971 - Rule 6

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT320(HC)

been defined. The policemen are known by their duties as have been laid down in section 23 of Police Act, 1861 and specifically under Chapter 6 of the P.R.B., which also are, to maintain public peace, to prevent commission … of the respondents violates the provisions of different Articles of the Constitution, viz. Articles 14, 16, 19, 23, 38, 41 and 43. They claim that it is a mere eye-wash that they are shown as 'volunteers' or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1955

Joti Parshad Ram Kirpal Vs. Superintendent of Police, Gurgaon and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-24-1955

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of Inida - Articles 226, 311 and 311(2); Police Act, 1861 - Sections 35; Punjab Police Rules - Rule 16.38

Reported in : AIR1956P& H102

no relevance to a departmental enquiry of the kind to which the petitioner was subjected. Rule 16 . 38 of the Police Rules relates to criminal offences committed by a Police Officer in connection with the official … have been enquired into by a Magistrate of the 1st Class as required by Section 35 of the Police Act, 5 of 1861.(8) In dismissing the petitioner the Superintendent of Police had violated the provisions of Police Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1988

State of Punjab Vs. Raj Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-11-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 16.38; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4 and 5; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 7 and 12; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1988SC805; 1988CriLJ914; JT1988(1)SC476; 1988(1)SCALE319; (1988)1SCC701; [1988]2SCR936

Before we advert to the decisions pertaining to Rule 16.38, we may refer to certain provisions of the Police Act 1861 and the Punjab Police Rules framed thereunder. Section 3 of the Police Act, confers the right of superintendence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 1967

Jay Engineering Works Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-29-1967

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Special Law; ;Indian Penal Code; ;Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 17 and 18; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 166(1), 166(3), 226 and 256; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54, 100, 127, 151, 154 and 157; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 141 - Order 1, Rule 1; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 57(3)

Reported in : AIR1968Cal407,72CWN440

Cr. P. C. properly understood are in perfect harmony with the duties enjoined by Section 23 of the Police Act, 1861, Section 10A of Calcutta Police Act, 1866 and Section 4A of Calcutta Suburban Police Act. Instead of being in … this proceeding it is not necessary to consider if other offences like Criminal Conspiracy (Section 120B), Extortion (Section 384) and Intimidation (Section 503) were also constituted by those acts. For answering the third issue which requires us

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1928

Narayan Hari Tarkhande Vs. Yeshwant Raoji Naik

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-1928

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1928Bom352; (1928)30BOMLR1018

but he contended that the prosecution was time-barred under Sub-section (3) of Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890. This sub-section says :-In any case of an alleged offence by a Magistrate, police-officer or other person... … 8 B.H.C.195. Under 55 & 56 Vic c. 14, Section 5(passed in 1892 to amend the Indian Councils Act 1861) power was given to amend any law made before this Act, with the previous sanction of the Governor

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1961

The State of Punjab Vs. Barkat Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 9(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Police Act, 1861; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : AIR1962SC276; 1985(5)LC2194(SC); [1962]3SCR338

force regulating the manner of place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise dealing with such offences. 42. Police Act, 1861. Section 1........... the word 'police' shall include all persons who shall be enrolled under this Act. 43. Sea Customs … made by the respondents confessing their guilt were admissible in evidence and the convictions based thereon were sustainable. 38. Before considering the decisions cited at the Bar, let us look at the material provisions of the relevant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Nihal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

with the available police personnel. Therefore, the State of Punjab resorted to recruitment under section 17[1]. of the Police Act, 1861 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) which enabled the State (police officers not below the rank of Inspector)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1989

Malkiyat Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-08-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363 and 366 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 10 and 10(2); Arms Act - Sections 17

Reported in : ILR1989Delhi637

are with jurisdiction under PPR 16.38(1) and (2) or contrary to the mandatory statutory provisions. 10. The Punjab Police Act, 1861 was enacted for the regulation of Police. The Magistrate of the District is defined in the interpretation clause, … their protective custody. 2. FIR No. 728/73 was registered on May 25, 1973 at police station Daryaganj under sections 363/366 IPC on a complaint by one Shri Narinder Kumar, father of Miss Shashi Bala against Shri Mohinder

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1989

Malkiyat Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 16 - Sections 38(1)(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1112

are with jurisdiction under Ppr 16.3.8(1) and (2) or contrary to the mandatory statutory provisions. (10) The Punjab Police Act, 1861 was enacted for the regnlation of Police. The Magistrate of the District is defined in the interpretation clause, … all consequential benefits. The parties are, however, left to bear their own costs throughout. Criminal - dismissal - Section 38 (1) (2) and Rule 16 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 and Section 10 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1999

Sunkara Satyanarayana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders - Orders 733 to 737 and 742; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32 and 226; Gaming Act - Sections 9(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)117; 1999(6)ALT249; 2000CriLJ1297

of M.P. Police Regulations. These regulations were framed by the Government of M.P. Under Section 46(2)(c) of the Police Act, 1861. One of the objects of the Act is to prevent commission of offences. Though Regulation 856 permitted domiciliary … 272 to 275/71 of Town P.S. Gudivada. 109 Cr.P.C. Convicted 2. Cr.No. 125/72 to 126/72 Gudivada Town P.S. 380 IPC -do- 3. Cr.No. 323/74 of Gudivada Police Station 457 IPC -do- 4. Cr.No. 189/74 of Gudivada Police

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial