Advanced Search Results

Kedar Nath Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 2, 7, 46, 46(2) and 46(3); Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rules 5(1), 5(2), 14 and 17; Police Regulations - Regulations 492, 493 and 496; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC1955

of powers under Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 46 read with Sections 2 and 7 of the Police Act, 1861 (Act No. 5 of 1861) and all other power enabling him in this behalf and in supersession of … footnote the details of the notifications of which the result are the particular Regulations.20. The entirety of Chapter XXXII was, however, a result of an exercise of statutory rule-making powers, and the said rule-making power was again

P. Arockiasamy Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli an ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the previous years. 7. The other ground mentioned in the order impugned is that Section 32 of the Police Act, 1861 is in force in the area where the cultural programme is sought to be performed. However, Section 30(2)

Nihal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

with the available police personnel. Therefore, the State of Punjab resorted to recruitment under section 17[1]. of the Police Act, 1861 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) which enabled the State (police officers not below the rank of Inspector) … public appointment. It was further declared that the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Courts under Article 226 or Article 32 cannot be exercised to compel the State or to enable the State to perpetuate an illegality. This court

Khatri and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 36, 162, 172 and 202; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32(1), 35, 122, 123, 124, 126, 129, 145 and 161; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1981SC1068; 1981(29)BLJR425; 1981(1)SCALE531; (1981)2SCC493; [1981]3SCR145; 1981(13)LC924(SC)

by an order dated 28-29th November, 1980 made by the State Government under Section 3 of the Indian Police Act 1861, Sh. (sic) L.V. Singh was directed by the State Government to investigate into 24 cases of blinding of … this Section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of Clause (1) of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, or to affect the provisions of Section 27 of that Act.It bars

Sh. Prakash P. Hinduja Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Police Special Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 4 and 4(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 36, 154, 173, 173(2), 173(8) and 321; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 142 and 144; Constitutional Law

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT448; 2002(64)DRJ34

section conferring such power prescribes one. Thus the general power of superintendence as conferred by Section 3 of Police Act, 1861 would comprehend the power to exercise effective control over the actions, performance and discharge of duties by the … the validity of the charge-sheet already filed. Every public prosecutor has available to him power as under Section 321 of the Cr.P.C. to withdrawn prosecution in appropriate cases. No accused can seek recall of the process issued

Public Prosecutor Vs. K.G. Sivaswamy and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1954CriLJ290

reads as follows:After an application for a licence to take out a procession is made under Section 30, Police Act, 1861, the applicant is free to take out the procession whether the licence applied for is issued or not. … the meeting. Thereupon the Inspector arrested both Sivasami and Ponniah & subsequently laid a charge-sheet against them under Section 32, Police Act.The Sub-Magistrate, Koilpatti, acquitted both the accused holding:In the result, I find firstly that the order Ex.

Narayan Hari Tarkhande Vs. Yeshwant Raoji Naik

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1928Bom352; (1928)30BOMLR1018

but he contended that the prosecution was time-barred under Sub-section (3) of Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890. This sub-section says :-In any case of an alleged offence by a Magistrate, police-officer or other person... … 8 B.H.C.195. Under 55 & 56 Vic c. 14, Section 5(passed in 1892 to amend the Indian Councils Act 1861) power was given to amend any law made before this Act, with the previous sanction of the Governor … reduce into writing any statement made by the 'persons so examined. Section 32(I)(b) of the same Act reproduces the provisions of Section 51(1)(b) of the

Krishna Lal Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1917All450; 35Ind.Cas.1008

on behalf of one Krishna Lal, who has been convicted of an offence under Section 82 of the Police Act (V of 1861). The conviction has been upheld in appeal by the District Magistrate. The above-mentioned Section of … acting as a jatrawal in Moghal Sarai without having obtained a licence.5. A reference to the language of Section 32 of the Act and of the three preceding sections satisfies me that the Superintendent of Police had no

Emperor Vs. Krishna Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All131

on behalf of one Krishna Lal who has been convicted of an offence under Section 32 of the Police Act (V of 1861). The conviction has been upheld in appeal by the District Magistrate. The above mentioned section

Emperor Vs. R.N. Basu (for B. Parshottam Das Tandon)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1933All614; 145Ind.Cas.738

Allahabad, on behalf of the accused B. Parshottam Das Tandon, who was fined Rs. 200 under Section 32, Police Act, by the City Magistrate of Allahabad. I have discussed in the connected case the question of whether an … justified. In the present case the accused was served with an order under Section 30, Police Act of 1861, directing him and the other conveners of a meeting to apply for a license. They did not apply